- From: Olli Pettay <Olli.Pettay@helsinki.fi>
- Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2013 13:49:10 +0100
- To: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com>, ext Ms2ger <ms2ger@gmail.com>
- CC: Doug Schepers <doug@w3.org>, Matt Brubeck <mbrubeck@mozilla.com>, Sangwhan Moon <smoon@opera.com>, public-webevents@w3.org
On 03/18/2013 01:08 PM, Arthur Barstow wrote: > On 3/18/13 8:05 AM, ext Ms2ger wrote: >> On 03/18/2013 12:54 PM, Arthur Barstow wrote: >>> Touch Events Editors, All, >>> >>> Below, Boris identifies some bugs with the Touch Events v1 spec's IDL. >>> Please review his comments and propose how these issues should be >>> addressed. >>> >>> My proposed resolution to these bugs ... >>> >>> * Touch.createTouch() - change the AbstractView type to WindowProxy and >>> add [HTML5] to the references. >>> >>> * Touch.target - the definition of Touch.target should replace Element >>> with TargetEvent >>> >> >> EventTarget, presumably. > > Ooops. Yes, thanks. > >>> * TouchList.item() - clarify the indices are 0 ... length-1 >>> >>> * TouchList.item() - clarify that it returns null if index is >= >>> TouchList.length >>> >>> * Since TouchList.item returns null if the index is >= length, change >>> the signature to: >>> >>> [[ >>> getter Touch? item (unsigned long index); >>> ]] >> >> Looks good otherwise. Can we update the spec now? > > Since the spec is effectively still under LC review, I'd like to hear from some others (especially Matt, Sangwhan, Rick, Olli). Proposed changes look good to me. -Olli > > -AB > >> >> Thanks >> Ms2ger >> > >
Received on Monday, 18 March 2013 12:50:09 UTC