- From: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com>
- Date: Fri, 01 Mar 2013 06:39:44 -0500
- To: ext Rick Byers <rbyers@google.com>
- CC: "public-webevents@w3.org" <public-webevents@w3.org>
On 2/28/13 9:32 PM, ext Rick Byers wrote: > Hey Art, > We had talked that we should publish some sort of design note. I'm > not sure of the exact mechanism you guys had in mind - if I recall we > agreed that I'd come up with the verbage, and you'd help me figure out > where best to stash it and how it should be formatted. > > Since touch events proceeds pointer events, I don't think there is any > reason we should try to get something into the touch events v1 spec > itself. OK, that was my main concern -> TEv1 will not reference the mapping document. > I don't think we'll really get it right until we have > implementation experience with a UA having both pointer and touch > events, and we certainly don't want to block TEv1 on that. > > Sound good? Yes, that makes sense to me. Among the options for documenting the mapping are just using the wiki or a stand-alone "WG Note". We can decide the "how to document" question when we have some text to review. -Thanks, Art > Rick > > On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 1:04 PM, Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com> wrote: >> Hi Rick, >> >> Before I start a CfC to publish a Proposed Recommendation (PR) of Touch >> Events v1, I'd like to understand your thoughts and plans for this action. >> >> If the idea is to document the mapping outside of the TEv1 spec, then of >> course this action doesn't block the PR; otherwise, this action is blocking >> the CfC for PR. >> >> Would you please clarify your intent? >> >> (Perhaps this could be handled like the PFWG's request [1] i.e. add a bit of >> context to the spec and link to the details.) >> >> -Thanks, ArtB >> >> [1] >> <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webevents/2013JanMar/0053.html> >> >> >> -------- Original Message -------- >> Subject: Re: ACTION-101: Work with Doug and Rick on defining Touch >> Events mapping in the Web Events WG >> Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2013 09:34:50 -0500 >> From: ext Rick Byers <rbyers@google.com> >> To: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com> >> CC: Doug Schepers <doug@w3.org>, Web Events Working Group >> <public-webevents@w3.org> >> >> >> >> I don't have any concrete progress yet - sorry. I have some ideas, but I >> want to gather more data and write them up precisely before soliciting >> feedback (and I'm giving priority to the other more urgent PE questions >> first). >> >> Rick >> >> On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 8:26 AM, Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com >> <mailto:art.barstow@nokia.com>> wrote: >> >> On 12/6/12 11:52 AM, ext Web Events Working Group Issue Tracker wrote: >> >> ACTION-101: Work with Doug and Rick on defining Touch Events >> mapping in the Web Events WG (Web Events Working Group) >> >> http://www.w3.org/2010/webevents/track/actions/101 >> >> On: Arthur Barstow >> Due: 2012-12-13 >> >> >> Hi Rick, >> >> I was wondering if you have any work on the TouchEvents and >> PointerEvents mapping to share? >> >> Regarding "where" to document the mapping, options include a Working >> Group noteand a wiki document. Currently, I am indifferent as to >> where this info is documented but I do think it should be somewhere >> in w3.org <http://w3.org> space. >> >> >> Doug - any thoughts from you on how/where to document this mapping? >> >> -Thanks, Art >> >> >> >> >>
Received on Friday, 1 March 2013 11:40:14 UTC