public-webauthn@w3.org from February 2019 by author

=JeffH

• [w3c/webauthn] c5c29b: update spec to Level 2 (#1156) (Saturday, 9 February)
• [w3c/webauthn] 160b9b: update spec to Level 2 (Thursday, 7 February)
• [w3c/webauthn] 0fbb40: update JeffH's affiliation (#1154) (Wednesday, 6 February)
• [w3c/webauthn] bc4e04: update JeffH's affiliation (Wednesday, 6 February)
• [w3c/webauthn] (Wednesday, 6 February)

=JeffH via GitHub

• Re: [webauthn] Add notion of forbidding resident credential creation (#1149) (Wednesday, 13 February)
• Re: [webauthn] AuthenticatorTransport description is incorrect (#1153) (Wednesday, 13 February)
• Re: [webauthn] undefined terms and terms we really ought to define (#462) (Wednesday, 13 February)
• Closed: [webauthn] Platform authenticators and key stores (#851) (Tuesday, 12 February)
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by equalsJeffH (Tuesday, 12 February)
• Closed: [webauthn] Return the employed AuthenticatorTransport when creating a new credential (#889) (Tuesday, 12 February)
• [webauthn] Merged Pull Request: Provide transport information during registration. (Tuesday, 12 February)
• Re: [webauthn] Provide transport information during registration. (#1050) (Monday, 11 February)
• [webauthn] Merged Pull Request: Recommend minimal basic attestation batches (Saturday, 9 February)
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by equalsJeffH (Saturday, 9 February)
• Closed: [webauthn] Attestation privacy advice creates large scale security risks (#1127) (Saturday, 9 February)
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by equalsJeffH (Saturday, 9 February)
• [webauthn] Merged Pull Request: update spec to Level 2 (Saturday, 9 February)
• Closed: [webauthn] update editor's draft to link to newly published Prop Rec (#1138) (Saturday, 9 February)
• Re: [webauthn] Support for apps acting as platform authenticators for authenticating in mobile browsers (#1150) (Thursday, 7 February)
• Re: [webauthn] update spec to Level 2 (#1156) (Thursday, 7 February)
• Re: [webauthn] Recommend minimal basic attestation batches (#1141) (Thursday, 7 February)
• Re: [webauthn] Propose extension: Delegation of Authentication (#1125) (Thursday, 7 February)
• Re: [webauthn] Lack of support for modern ECC (#1124) (Thursday, 7 February)
• Closed: [webauthn] Lack of support for modern ECC (#1124) (Thursday, 7 February)
• Re: [webauthn] Clarify relationships between "uv"/"up" of the CTAP spec and "userVerification"/"userPresence" (#1123) (Thursday, 7 February)
• [webauthn] Pull Request: update spec to Level 2 (Thursday, 7 February)
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by equalsJeffH (Thursday, 7 February)
• [webauthn] update working draft to be "level 2" (#1155) (Thursday, 7 February)
• Re: [webauthn] Add notion of forbidding resident credential creation (#1149) (Wednesday, 6 February)
• Re: [webauthn] update JeffH's affiliation (#1154) (Wednesday, 6 February)
• Re: [webauthn] update @equalJeffH's affiliation (#1137) (Wednesday, 6 February)
• Closed: [webauthn] update @equalJeffH's affiliation (#1137) (Wednesday, 6 February)
• [webauthn] Merged Pull Request: update JeffH's affiliation (Wednesday, 6 February)
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by equalsJeffH (Wednesday, 6 February)
• [webauthn] Pull Request: update JeffH's affiliation (Wednesday, 6 February)
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by equalsJeffH (Wednesday, 6 February)
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by equalsJeffH (Wednesday, 6 February)
• Re: [webauthn] coalesce HTML references? (#996) (Wednesday, 6 February)

Ackermann Yuriy

• Re: WebAuthn and dealing with authenticator firmware updates (Thursday, 21 February)

Ackermann Yuriy via GitHub

• Re: [webauthn] SafetyNet Attestation Clarifications (#968) (Sunday, 24 February)
• Re: [webauthn] Provide a tutorial on creating Authenticators (#1157) (Monday, 11 February)
• Re: [webauthn] Provide a tutorial on creating Authenticators (#1157) (Sunday, 10 February)
• Re: [webauthn] Provide a tutorial on creating Authenticators (#1157) (Sunday, 10 February)
• Re: [webauthn] Provide a tutorial on creating Authenticators (#1157) (Sunday, 10 February)
• Re: [webauthn] Provide a tutorial on creating Authenticators (#1157) (Sunday, 10 February)
• Re: [webauthn] Provide a tutorial on creating Authenticators (#1157) (Sunday, 10 February)
• Re: [webauthn] How do I use a smart phone as an authenticator when the web application is running on a laptop/desktop? (#954) (Wednesday, 6 February)
• Re: [webauthn] TPM attestation format & EdDSA & hash alg (#1148) (Tuesday, 5 February)
• Re: [webauthn] Where is the reference implementation for WebAuthn? (#1152) (Tuesday, 5 February)
• Re: [webauthn] How do I use a smart phone as an authenticator when the web application is running on a laptop/desktop? (#954) (Tuesday, 5 February)
• Re: [webauthn] How do I use a smart phone as an authenticator when the web application is running on a laptop/desktop? (#954) (Monday, 4 February)
• Re: [webauthn] TPM attestation format & EdDSA & hash alg (#1148) (Saturday, 2 February)

Adam Langley

• Re: Man-in-the-middle attack against WebAuthn by a powerful attacker (Friday, 22 February)
• [w3c/webauthn] 11d549: Provide transport information during registration.... (Tuesday, 12 February)

Adam Langley via GitHub

• Closed: [webauthn] What is the point of `allowCredentials`? (#867) (Wednesday, 20 February)
• Re: [webauthn] What is the point of `allowCredentials`? (#867) (Wednesday, 20 February)
• Closed: [webauthn] Protect against TLS MiTM by including TLS cert chain in signature (#391) (Wednesday, 20 February)
• Re: [webauthn] Protect against TLS MiTM by including TLS cert chain in signature (#391) (Wednesday, 20 February)
• Closed: [webauthn] WebAuthn API for Browser (like Chrome) extension (#1158) (Wednesday, 13 February)
• Re: [webauthn] WebAuthn API for Browser (like Chrome) extension (#1158) (Wednesday, 13 February)
• Re: [webauthn] Unspecified CBOR encoding of high-valued integer numbers due to unspecified threshold (#1044) (Wednesday, 6 February)
• Re: [webauthn] TPM attestation format & EdDSA & hash alg (#1148) (Friday, 1 February)

Akshay Kumar

• RE: WebAuthn and dealing with authenticator firmware updates (Thursday, 21 February)

Akshay Kumar via GitHub

• Closed: [webauthn] Authenticator disconnect event (#1107) (Wednesday, 20 February)
• Re: [webauthn] Authenticator disconnect event (#1107) (Wednesday, 20 February)
• Re: [webauthn] Let requireUserPresence always be true in authenticator operations (#1140) (Wednesday, 6 February)

Anthony Nadalin

• W3C WebAuthn F2F Draft Agenda for March 7th 2019 (Thursday, 28 February)
• 02/27/2019 W3C Web Authentication WG Meeting Agenda (Wednesday, 27 February)
• 02/20/2019 W3C Web Authentication WG Meeting Agenda (Wednesday, 20 February)
• 02/06/2019 W3C Web Authentication WG Meeting Agenda (Wednesday, 13 February)
• 02/13/2019 W3C Web Authentication WG Meeting Agenda (Wednesday, 13 February)
• RE: "WebAuthn Level 1" branch created (Wednesday, 6 February)
• WebAuthn Face-to-Face on March 7th (Wednesday, 6 February)
• 02/06/2019 W3C Web Authentication WG Meeting Agenda (Tuesday, 5 February)

Anthony Nadalin via GitHub

• Closed: [webauthn] Candidate recommendation exit criteria (#837) (Thursday, 28 February)
• Re: [webauthn] add notion of "enterprise" attestation (#1147) (Wednesday, 27 February)
• Closed: [webauthn] Propose extension: Delegation of Authentication (#1125) (Wednesday, 27 February)
• Re: [webauthn] Propose extension: Delegation of Authentication (#1125) (Wednesday, 27 February)
• Closed: [webauthn] Add required matcher protection to AuthenticatorSelectionCriteria (#447) (Wednesday, 20 February)
• Re: [webauthn] Add required matcher protection to AuthenticatorSelectionCriteria (#447) (Wednesday, 20 February)
• Closed: [webauthn] Add required key protection to AuthenticatorSelectionCriteria (#446) (Wednesday, 20 February)
• Re: [webauthn] Add required key protection to AuthenticatorSelectionCriteria (#446) (Wednesday, 20 February)
• Re: [webauthn] Add biometric accuracy to AuthenticatorSelectionCriteria (#445) (Wednesday, 20 February)
• Closed: [webauthn] Add biometric accuracy to AuthenticatorSelectionCriteria (#445) (Wednesday, 20 February)
• Re: [webauthn] remove "required" on ScopedCredentialDescriptor.id (#245) (Wednesday, 20 February)
• Re: [webauthn] update working draft to be "level 2" (#1155) (Wednesday, 13 February)
• Closed: [webauthn] Support for apps acting as platform authenticators for authenticating in mobile browsers (#1150) (Wednesday, 13 February)
• Re: [webauthn] Add registration/authentication extensions for cloud-assisted BLE (#909) (Wednesday, 13 February)
• Re: [webauthn] Add examples of authenticator types to Authenticator definition (#1131) (Wednesday, 13 February)
• Re: [webauthn] Fix android-safetynet trust path (#1142) (Wednesday, 13 February)
• Re: [webauthn] Determine appid extension output after authenticator returns (#1143) (Wednesday, 13 February)
• Re: [webauthn] Add None attestation case to RP ops registration step 16 (#1145) (Wednesday, 13 February)
• Closed: [webauthn] Provide a tutorial on creating Authenticators (#1157) (Wednesday, 13 February)
• Re: [webauthn] TPM attestation format & EdDSA & hash alg (#1148) (Tuesday, 5 February)
• Re: [webauthn] Where is the reference implementation for WebAuthn? (#1152) (Tuesday, 5 February)
• Closed: [webauthn] Where is the reference implementation for WebAuthn? (#1152) (Tuesday, 5 February)

Bart via GitHub

• Re: [webauthn] SafetyNet Attestation Clarifications (#968) (Sunday, 24 February)

Christiaan Brand

• Re: [webauthn] add notion of "enterprise" attestation (#1147) (Wednesday, 27 February)
• Re: "WebAuthn Level 1" branch created (Wednesday, 6 February)
• Re: WebAuthn Face-to-Face on March 7th (Wednesday, 6 February)

David Waite

• Re: Man-in-the-middle attack against WebAuthn by a powerful attacker (Friday, 22 February)

Emil Lundberg

• [w3c/webauthn] (Wednesday, 27 February)
• [w3c/webauthn] a68031: Add examples of authenticator types to Authenticat... (Wednesday, 27 February)
• [w3c/webauthn] b3ca18: Use — instead of - (Wednesday, 27 February)
• [w3c/webauthn] (Wednesday, 20 February)
• [w3c/webauthn] e09147: Fix android-safetynet trust path (Wednesday, 20 February)
• [w3c/webauthn] d5facf: Add definition alias "WebAuthn Authenticator" (Wednesday, 20 February)
• [w3c/webauthn] 175d9f: Clarify user identification in RP assertion verifi... (Tuesday, 19 February)
• [w3c/webauthn] (Tuesday, 19 February)
• [w3c/webauthn] 4b28f8: tmp (Tuesday, 19 February)
• [w3c/webauthn] c599aa: tmp (Tuesday, 19 February)
• [w3c/webauthn] 9f7aee: tmp (Tuesday, 19 February)
• [w3c/webauthn] a2d616: Remove trailing whitespace (Tuesday, 19 February)
• [w3c/webauthn] 9e72ec: Fix incorrect description of AuthenticatorAttachment (Monday, 18 February)
• [w3c/webauthn] (Thursday, 14 February)
• Re: wrt "meta pull-requests" milestone... (Thursday, 14 February)
• [w3c/webauthn] (Thursday, 14 February)
• [w3c/webauthn] (Thursday, 14 February)
• [w3c/webauthn] 175d9f: Clarify user identification in RP assertion verifi... (Thursday, 14 February)
• [w3c/webauthn] 109165: Add None attestation case to RP ops registration s... (Wednesday, 13 February)
• [w3c/webauthn] (Wednesday, 13 February)
• [w3c/webauthn] (Saturday, 9 February)
• [w3c/webauthn] b4a611: Recommend minimal basic attestation batches (#1141) (Saturday, 9 February)
• [w3c/webauthn] (Thursday, 7 February)
• [w3c/webauthn] (Wednesday, 6 February)
• [w3c/webauthn] 10e5b4: Update wording as suggested by @selfissued (Wednesday, 6 February)
• [w3c/webauthn] 76cf6d: Fix typo (#1081) (Wednesday, 6 February)

Emil Lundberg via GitHub

• Re: [webauthn] undefined terms and terms we really ought to define (#462) (Wednesday, 27 February)
• Re: [webauthn] Refine User Verification description (#1162) (Wednesday, 27 February)
• Re: [webauthn] Refine User Verification description (#1162) (Wednesday, 27 February)
• [webauthn] Merged Pull Request: Add examples of authenticator types to Authenticator definition (Wednesday, 27 February)
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by emlun (Wednesday, 27 February)
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by emlun (Wednesday, 27 February)
• Re: [webauthn] No way to identify authenticator type whether is is platform or roaming if RP does not specify the type during registration (#1163) (Friday, 22 February)
• Re: [webauthn] No way to identify authenticator type whether is is platform or roaming if RP does not specify the type during registration (#1163) (Friday, 22 February)
• Re: [webauthn] Travis build is broken (#1160) (Wednesday, 20 February)
• Closed: [webauthn] Travis build is broken (#1160) (Wednesday, 20 February)
• Re: [webauthn] SafetyNet Attestation Clarifications (#968) (Wednesday, 20 February)
• Closed: [webauthn] update working draft to be "level 2" (#1155) (Wednesday, 20 February)
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by emlun (Wednesday, 20 February)
• Closed: [webauthn] Is android-safetynet attestation trust path limited to one cert? (#1132) (Wednesday, 20 February)
• [webauthn] Merged Pull Request: Fix android-safetynet trust path (Wednesday, 20 February)
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by emlun (Wednesday, 20 February)
• [webauthn] Merged Pull Request: Add "Webauthn Authenticator" definition alias (Wednesday, 20 February)
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by emlun (Tuesday, 19 February)
• Re: [webauthn] Travis build is broken (#1160) (Tuesday, 19 February)
• Re: [webauthn] Travis build is broken (#1160) (Tuesday, 19 February)
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by emlun (Tuesday, 19 February)
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by emlun (Tuesday, 19 February)
• [webauthn] Travis build is broken (#1160) (Tuesday, 19 February)
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by emlun (Tuesday, 19 February)
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by emlun (Tuesday, 19 February)
• [webauthn] Pull Request: Fix incorrect AuthenticatorAttachment description (Monday, 18 February)
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by emlun (Monday, 18 February)
• Re: [webauthn] update working draft to be "level 2" (#1155) (Thursday, 14 February)
• [webauthn] Merged Pull Request: Use "user handle mapped to user" language in user identification step (Thursday, 14 February)
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by emlun (Thursday, 14 February)
• Re: [webauthn] Add examples of authenticator types to Authenticator definition (#1131) (Thursday, 14 February)
• Re: [webauthn] Add notion of forbidding resident credential creation (#1149) (Wednesday, 13 February)
• Re: [webauthn] Let requireUserPresence always be true in authenticator operations (#1140) (Wednesday, 13 February)
• Re: [webauthn] Let requireUserPresence always be true in authenticator operations (#1140) (Wednesday, 13 February)
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by emlun (Wednesday, 13 February)
• [webauthn] Merged Pull Request: Add None attestation case to RP ops registration step 16 (Wednesday, 13 February)
• Closed: [webauthn] RP ops registration step 16 is missing a case for None attestation (#1136) (Wednesday, 13 February)
• Re: [webauthn] Support for apps acting as platform authenticators for authenticating in mobile browsers (#1150) (Monday, 11 February)
• Re: [webauthn] Propose extension: Delegation of Authentication (#1125) (Friday, 8 February)
• Re: [webauthn] Recommend minimal basic attestation batches (#1141) (Friday, 8 February)
• Re: [webauthn] AuthenticatorTransport description is incorrect (#1153) (Wednesday, 6 February)
• [webauthn] AuthenticatorTransport description is incorrect (#1153) (Wednesday, 6 February)
• [webauthn] Closed Pull Request: Make appid extension always return true (Wednesday, 6 February)
• Re: [webauthn] Make appid extension always return true (#1144) (Wednesday, 6 February)
• Closed: [webauthn] Ensure hard-coded step references in RP ops are correct (#797) (Wednesday, 6 February)
• Re: [webauthn] Ensure hard-coded step references in RP ops are correct (#797) (Wednesday, 6 February)
• Re: [webauthn] Let requireUserPresence always be true in authenticator operations (#1140) (Wednesday, 6 February)
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by emlun (Wednesday, 6 February)
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by emlun (Wednesday, 6 February)
• Re: [webauthn] How do I use a smart phone as an authenticator when the web application is running on a laptop/desktop? (#954) (Monday, 4 February)
• Re: [webauthn] Propose extension: Delegation of Authentication (#1125) (Friday, 1 February)

Fred Le Tamanoir

• Re: [webauthn] Protect against TLS MiTM by including TLS cert chain in signature (#391) (Sunday, 24 February)

gmandyam via GitHub

• Re: [webauthn] Define a attestation format with RFC8152-style signing? (#1164) (Thursday, 28 February)

holycleugh via GitHub

• [webauthn] Define a attestation format with RFC8152-style signing? (#1164) (Thursday, 28 February)
• Re: [webauthn] Provide a tutorial on creating Authenticators (#1157) (Sunday, 10 February)
• Re: [webauthn] Support for apps acting as platform authenticators for authenticating in mobile browsers (#1150) (Sunday, 10 February)
• [webauthn] Support for apps acting as platform authenticators for authenticating in mobile browsers (#1150) (Sunday, 3 February)

J.C. Jones

• Re: 02/06/2019 W3C Web Authentication WG Meeting Agenda (Tuesday, 5 February)

J.C. Jones via GitHub

• Re: [webauthn] add notion of "enterprise" attestation (#1147) (Wednesday, 27 February)

Jeff Hodges

• Re: wrt "meta pull-requests" milestone... (Thursday, 14 February)
• "WebAuthn Level 1" branch created (Wednesday, 6 February)

John Bradley

• Re: Man-in-the-middle attack against WebAuthn by a powerful attacker (Friday, 22 February)
• Re: WebAuthn and dealing with authenticator firmware updates (Thursday, 21 February)

John Bradley via GitHub

• Re: [webauthn] WebAuthn available to Workers? aka "silent authentication" (#199) (Wednesday, 20 February)
• Re: [webauthn] Provide a tutorial on creating Authenticators (#1157) (Sunday, 10 February)
• Re: [webauthn] Propose extension: Delegation of Authentication (#1125) (Friday, 8 February)
• Re: [webauthn] Add notion of forbidding resident credential creation (#1149) (Wednesday, 6 February)
• Re: [webauthn] How do I use a smart phone as an authenticator when the web application is running on a laptop/desktop? (#954) (Wednesday, 6 February)

Ki-Eun Shin via GitHub

• Re: [webauthn] No way to identify authenticator type whether is is platform or roaming if RP does not specify the type during registration (#1163) (Friday, 22 February)
• Closed: [webauthn] No way to identify authenticator type whether is is platform or roaming if RP does not specify the type during registration (#1163) (Friday, 22 February)
• [webauthn] No way to identify authenticator type whether is is platform or roaming if RP does not specify the type during registration (#1163) (Friday, 22 February)
• [webauthn] Refine User Verification description (#1162) (Friday, 22 February)
• [webauthn] WebAuthn API for Browser (like Chrome) extension (#1158) (Tuesday, 12 February)

KOLANICH via GitHub

• Re: [webauthn] Provide a tutorial on creating Authenticators (#1157) (Monday, 11 February)
• Re: [webauthn] Provide a tutorial on creating Authenticators (#1157) (Sunday, 10 February)
• Re: [webauthn] Provide a tutorial on creating Authenticators (#1157) (Sunday, 10 February)
• Re: [webauthn] Provide a tutorial on creating Authenticators (#1157) (Sunday, 10 February)
• Re: [webauthn] Provide a tutorial on creating Authenticators (#1157) (Sunday, 10 February)
• Re: [webauthn] Provide a tutorial on creating Authenticators (#1157) (Sunday, 10 February)
• Re: [webauthn] Provide a tutorial on creating Authenticators (#1157) (Sunday, 10 February)
• [webauthn] Provide a tutorial app (#1157) (Sunday, 10 February)

Mart Sõmermaa

• Re: Man-in-the-middle attack against WebAuthn by a powerful attacker (Friday, 22 February)
• Man-in-the-middle attack against WebAuthn by a powerful attacker (Thursday, 21 February)

Mart Sõmermaa via GitHub

• Re: [webauthn] Protect against TLS MiTM by including TLS cert chain in signature (#391) (Saturday, 23 February)

mduffy215 via GitHub

• Re: [webauthn] Where is the reference implementation for WebAuthn? (#1152) (Tuesday, 5 February)
• [webauthn] Where is the reference implementation for WebAuthn? (#1152) (Tuesday, 5 February)

Mike Jones via GitHub

• Re: [webauthn] Unspecified CBOR encoding of high-valued integer numbers due to unspecified threshold (#1044) (Wednesday, 6 February)
• Re: [webauthn] Make appid extension always return true (#1144) (Wednesday, 6 February)
• Re: [webauthn] Clarify relationships between "uv"/"up" of the CTAP spec and "userVerification"/"userPresence" (#1123) (Tuesday, 5 February)

Philippe Le Hegaret

• [w3c/webauthn] 63640b: Fixed various links, including new TR link (Wednesday, 20 February)

Philippe Le Hegaret via GitHub

• [webauthn] Pull Request: Fixed various links, including new TR link (Wednesday, 20 February)
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by plehegar (Wednesday, 20 February)

rlindemann@noknok.com

• AW: AW: WebAuthn and dealing with authenticator firmware updates (Thursday, 21 February)
• AW: WebAuthn and dealing with authenticator firmware updates (Thursday, 21 February)

Rolf Lindemann via GitHub

• Closed: [webauthn] TPM attestation format & EdDSA & hash alg (#1148) (Wednesday, 6 February)
• Re: [webauthn] TPM attestation format & EdDSA & hash alg (#1148) (Wednesday, 6 February)
• Re: [webauthn] TPM attestation format & EdDSA & hash alg (#1148) (Wednesday, 6 February)
• Re: [webauthn] TPM attestation format & EdDSA & hash alg (#1148) (Wednesday, 6 February)

Shane B Weeden

• Re: AW: WebAuthn and dealing with authenticator firmware updates (Thursday, 21 February)
• Re: WebAuthn and dealing with authenticator firmware updates (Thursday, 21 February)
• Re: WebAuthn and dealing with authenticator firmware updates (Thursday, 21 February)
• WebAuthn and dealing with authenticator firmware updates (Wednesday, 20 February)

Shane Weeden via GitHub

• Re: [webauthn] No way to verify requireResidentKey during registration step at RP side (#1060) (Tuesday, 5 February)

ToruAoyagi via GitHub

• Re: [webauthn] How do I use a smart phone as an authenticator when the web application is running on a laptop/desktop? (#954) (Wednesday, 6 February)
• Re: [webauthn] How do I use a smart phone as an authenticator when the web application is running on a laptop/desktop? (#954) (Tuesday, 5 February)
• Re: [webauthn] How do I use a smart phone as an authenticator when the web application is running on a laptop/desktop? (#954) (Tuesday, 5 February)
• Re: [webauthn] How do I use a smart phone as an authenticator when the web application is running on a laptop/desktop? (#954) (Monday, 4 February)
• Re: [webauthn] How do I use a smart phone as an authenticator when the web application is running on a laptop/desktop? (#954) (Monday, 4 February)

WebAuthnBot

• [w3c/webauthn] 80c8e8: Built by Travis-CI: 7bc2f0366c10e44d90390f2c894273... (Wednesday, 27 February)
• [w3c/webauthn] 0987e6: Built by Travis-CI: 4c074692cdf1da862d494ca35c0c2b... (Wednesday, 20 February)
• [w3c/webauthn] 143e42: Built by Travis-CI: 4c074692cdf1da862d494ca35c0c2b... (Wednesday, 20 February)
• [w3c/webauthn] 0fae76: Built by Travis-CI: b387399a38862919a7e3b2b3fb4c35... (Wednesday, 20 February)
• [w3c/webauthn] f240f7: Built by Travis-CI: b387399a38862919a7e3b2b3fb4c35... (Wednesday, 20 February)
• [w3c/webauthn] 762aba: Built by Travis-CI: b4a6110c20e7e03b526ad798aa1c8b... (Saturday, 9 February)
• [w3c/webauthn] 906b0d: Built by Travis-CI: b4a6110c20e7e03b526ad798aa1c8b... (Saturday, 9 February)
• [w3c/webauthn] 910fc5: Built by Travis-CI: c5c29b0eaf3cf072fca263184ab487... (Saturday, 9 February)
• [w3c/webauthn] bffedf: Built by Travis-CI: c5c29b0eaf3cf072fca263184ab487... (Saturday, 9 February)

WebAuthnBot via GitHub

• [webauthn] new commits pushed by WebAuthnBot (Wednesday, 27 February)
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by WebAuthnBot (Wednesday, 20 February)
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by WebAuthnBot (Wednesday, 20 February)
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by WebAuthnBot (Wednesday, 20 February)
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by WebAuthnBot (Wednesday, 20 February)
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by WebAuthnBot (Saturday, 9 February)
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by WebAuthnBot (Saturday, 9 February)
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by WebAuthnBot (Saturday, 9 February)
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by WebAuthnBot (Saturday, 9 February)

Last message date: Thursday, 28 February 2019 20:25:56 UTC