Re: wrt "meta pull-requests" milestone...

I went ahead and did this: added the label `process:meta-pr`, added it to
all PRs in the "Meta pull requests" milestone, and closed that milestone.

On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 8:01 PM J.C. Jones <jc@mozilla.com> wrote:

> I'm good either way, I just like having a more targeted list however we go
> about it.
>
> Thank you both!
> J.C.
>
> On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 9:59 AM Emil Lundberg <emil@yubico.com> wrote:
>
>> Works for me. The reason I made it a separate milestone was to keep them
>> from cluttering the agenda for the weekly calls. But on the other hand they
>> tend to be much shorter-lived, so that might not be much of an issue -
>> especially if we add a clear label for them.
>>
>> /Emil
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 6:52 PM =JeffH <Jeff.Hodges@kingsmountain.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> ...which in general is a good idea, tho I'm wondering whether we ought
>>> to make  "meta pull-requests"  a _label_, and then assign such PRs to
>>> the milestone that the target PR is assigned to?  this way the meta-PRs
>>> will show up in lists filtered by milestone such as PropRec.
>>>
>>> thoughts?
>>>
>>> thx,
>>>
>>> =JeffH
>>>
>>> --
>>
>> Emil Lundberg
>>
>> Software Developer | Yubico <http://www.yubico.com/>
>>
>>
>> --

Emil Lundberg

Software Developer | Yubico <http://www.yubico.com/>