Thanks for doing that @emlun! On Thu, Feb 14, 2019 at 1:34 AM Emil Lundberg <emil@yubico.com> wrote: > I went ahead and did this: added the label `process:meta-pr`, added it to > all PRs in the "Meta pull requests" milestone, and closed that milestone. > > On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 8:01 PM J.C. Jones <jc@mozilla.com> wrote: > >> I'm good either way, I just like having a more targeted list however we >> go about it. >> >> Thank you both! >> J.C. >> >> On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 9:59 AM Emil Lundberg <emil@yubico.com> wrote: >> >>> Works for me. The reason I made it a separate milestone was to keep them >>> from cluttering the agenda for the weekly calls. But on the other hand they >>> tend to be much shorter-lived, so that might not be much of an issue - >>> especially if we add a clear label for them. >>> >>> /Emil >>> >>> >>> On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 6:52 PM =JeffH <Jeff.Hodges@kingsmountain.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> ...which in general is a good idea, tho I'm wondering whether we ought >>>> to make "meta pull-requests" a _label_, and then assign such PRs to >>>> the milestone that the target PR is assigned to? this way the meta-PRs >>>> will show up in lists filtered by milestone such as PropRec. >>>> >>>> thoughts? >>>> >>>> thx, >>>> >>>> =JeffH >>>> >>>> -- >>> >>> Emil Lundberg >>> >>> Software Developer | Yubico <http://www.yubico.com/> >>> >>> >>> -- > > Emil Lundberg > > Software Developer | Yubico <http://www.yubico.com/> > > > -- Thanks, HTH, =JeffH
Received on Thursday, 14 February 2019 21:19:46 UTC