public-webauthn@w3.org from July 2016 by date

Friday, 29 July 2016

• RE: returning a multi-factor authenticator's factor-in-use and protection scheme to the server Sarangdhar, Nitin V
• PR for cleaning up wording around client-to-authenticator interface Vijay Bharadwaj
• Re: Can we remove the PSL dependency? Richard Barnes
• RE: Can we remove the PSL dependency? Vijay Bharadwaj
• Re: draft-hodges-webauthn-registries-00 Mark Nottingham
• RE: draft-hodges-webauthn-registries-00 Mandyam, Giridhar

Thursday, 28 July 2016

• Re: Can we remove the PSL dependency? Richard Barnes
• Re: [webauthn] Remove attestation specification from spec gmandyam via GitHub
• Re: wrt deprecating eTLD+1 (was: Can we remove the PSL dependency?) Richard Barnes
• wrt deprecating eTLD+1 (was: Can we remove the PSL dependency?) jeff.hodges@kingsmountain.com
• Re: Can we remove the PSL dependency? jeff.hodges@kingsmountain.com
• Re: [webauthn] Remove attestation specification from spec =JeffH via GitHub
• Re: Can we remove the PSL dependency? Brad Hill
• Re: Can we remove the PSL dependency? Brad Hill
• Re: Can we remove the PSL dependency? Alexei Czeskis
• Can we remove the PSL dependency? Richard Barnes
• Re: [webauthn] Remove attestation specification from spec gmandyam via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Remove attestation specification from spec Mike Jones via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Remove attestation specification from spec gmandyam via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Remove attestation specification from spec Mike Jones via GitHub
• RE: wrt registries (was: Spec status) Vijay Bharadwaj
• RE: wrt registries (was: Spec status) Vijay Bharadwaj
• Re: [webauthn] Remove attestation specification from spec gmandyam via GitHub
• Re: wrt registries (was: Spec status) jeff.hodges@kingsmountain.com
• Re: [webauthn] Remove attestation specification from spec =JeffH via GitHub
• [webauthn] add references to IANA WebAuthn Attestation Types and Extension Identifiers Registries =JeffH via GitHub
• wrt registries (was: Spec status) jeff.hodges@kingsmountain.com
• [w3c/webauthn] 66ed07: Replace facet with origin GitHub
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by vijaybh Vijay Bharadwaj via GitHub
• [webauthn] Client processing steps are not aligned with authenticator model Vijay Bharadwaj via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Remove attestation specification from spec Vijay Bharadwaj via GitHub
• [w3c/webauthn] dd9a4d: Built by Travis-CI: 9636ca2600c11d28aa124eb0ff1b12... GitHub
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by WebAuthnBot WebAuthnBot via GitHub

Wednesday, 27 July 2016

• [w3c/webauthn] GitHub
• [w3c/webauthn] 9636ca: Various minor technical fixes (#147) GitHub
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by vijaybh Vijay Bharadwaj via GitHub
• Closed: [webauthn] key-attestation: KeyHandle in attestaion rawData type="packed" Vijay Bharadwaj via GitHub
• Closed: [webauthn] add invocation of authenticatorCancel to step 8 of makeCredential ? Vijay Bharadwaj via GitHub
• Closed: [webauthn] Secure context should be MUST not SHOULD Vijay Bharadwaj via GitHub
• Closed: [webauthn] clientDataJSON returned in WebAuthnAttestation rather than AttestationStatement Vijay Bharadwaj via GitHub
• Closed: [webauthn] Key-Attestation: Packed attestation length Vijay Bharadwaj via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Various minor technical fixes Vijay Bharadwaj via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Various minor technical fixes J.C. Jones via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Clarify how a user can authenticate from multiple devices Anthony Nadalin via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Clarify how a user can authenticate from multiple devices cjthompson via GitHub
• Closed: [webauthn] Clarify how a user can authenticate from multiple devices cjthompson via GitHub
• [w3c/webauthn] 6c9da4: Built by Travis-CI: c1034168ef9c868ac1132a7dcf0098... GitHub
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by WebAuthnBot WebAuthnBot via GitHub
• [w3c/webauthn] c55b57: IDL cleanup: replace optional parameters with a si... GitHub
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by vijaybh Vijay Bharadwaj via GitHub
• [webauthn] Problem with authn selection extension Vijay Bharadwaj via GitHub

Tuesday, 26 July 2016

• Re: [webauthn] Clarify how a user can authenticate from multiple devices Anthony Nadalin via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Clarify how a user can authenticate from multiple devices cjthompson via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Clarify how a user can authenticate from multiple devices Anthony Nadalin via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Clarify how a user can authenticate from multiple devices Vijay Bharadwaj via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Clarify how a user can authenticate from multiple devices cjthompson via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Clarify how a user can authenticate from multiple devices Anthony Nadalin via GitHub
• [webauthn] Clarify how a user can authenticate from multiple devices cjthompson via GitHub
• Re: Is the getAssertion whitelist necessary? Hodges, Jeff
• Re: [webauthn] "version 4 GUID" should be "version 4 UUID" =JeffH via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] "version 4 GUID" should be "version 4 UUID" =JeffH via GitHub
• [w3c/webauthn] ce9a35: Built by Travis-CI: 06635127fd55cfde58fc37dd6c913e... GitHub
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by WebAuthnBot WebAuthnBot via GitHub
• [w3c/webauthn] 066351: TravisCI Fix: Don't update gh-pages for non-master... GitHub
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by jcjones J.C. Jones via GitHub
• 07/27/2016 W3C Web Authentication WG Agenda Anthony Nadalin
• RE: returning a multi-factor authenticator's factor-in-use and protection scheme to the server Ghosh, Rahuldeva
• Re: [webauthn] "version 4 GUID" should be "version 4 UUID" Vijay Bharadwaj via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] do we need "Byte length l of AAGUID" ? =JeffH via GitHub
• [webauthn] do we need "Byte length l of AAGUID" ? =JeffH via GitHub
• [webauthn] AAGUID must be a "version 4 UUID" ? =JeffH via GitHub
• [webauthn] "version 4 GUID" should be "version 4 UUID" =JeffH via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Secure context should be MUST not SHOULD =JeffH via GitHub
• Re: returning a multi-factor authenticator's factor-in-use and protection scheme to the server Hodges, Jeff

Monday, 25 July 2016

• RE: Is the getAssertion whitelist necessary? Vijay Bharadwaj
• [w3c/webauthn] b67782: Built by Travis-CI: 6855bf00aca639c0c631f4aa8239e4... GitHub
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by WebAuthnBot WebAuthnBot via GitHub
• [w3c/webauthn] c55b57: IDL cleanup: replace optional parameters with a si... GitHub
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by vijaybh Vijay Bharadwaj via GitHub
• RE: returning a multi-factor authenticator's factor-in-use and protection scheme to the server Vijay Bharadwaj
• RE: returning a multi-factor authenticator's factor-in-use and protection scheme to the server Ghosh, Rahuldeva

Sunday, 24 July 2016

• Re: returning a multi-factor authenticator's factor-in-use and protection scheme to the server Rolf Lindemann

Friday, 22 July 2016

• [w3c/webauthn] 2adf0d: Built by Travis-CI: c55b57b5bbcf63dc06efbf7c5dd827... GitHub
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by WebAuthnBot WebAuthnBot via GitHub
• [w3c/webauthn] GitHub
• [w3c/webauthn] c55b57: IDL cleanup: replace optional parameters with a si... GitHub
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by vijaybh Vijay Bharadwaj via GitHub
• Closed: [webauthn] Move optional parameters and extensions into an "options" dictionary Vijay Bharadwaj via GitHub
• Closed: [webauthn] credentialList should be whitelist in step 6, 1st bullet, of getAssertion() processing rules Vijay Bharadwaj via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] IDL cleanup: replace optional parameters with a single optional dictionary Vijay Bharadwaj via GitHub
• RE: returning a multi-factor authenticator's factor-in-use and protection scheme to the server Ghosh, Rahuldeva
• RE: Attestation formats Vijay Bharadwaj
• Re: returning a multi-factor authenticator's factor-in-use and protection scheme to the server Malcolm Young
• AW: Attestation formats Rolf Lindemann
• RE: Attestation formats Vijay Bharadwaj
• AW: Attestation formats Rolf Lindemann
• Attestation formats Vijay Bharadwaj
• returning a multi-factor authenticator's factor-in-use and protection scheme to the server Ghosh, Rahuldeva
• [w3c/webauthn] 2dc57e: Built by Travis-CI: 2d07450b288b4fc3b145851a6a4b8f... GitHub
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by WebAuthnBot WebAuthnBot via GitHub
• [w3c/webauthn] 3a08cd: Secure context requirement: SHOULD -> MUST GitHub
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by vijaybh Vijay Bharadwaj via GitHub

Thursday, 21 July 2016

• [w3c/webauthn] 779377: Built by Travis-CI: 87205a97edb11c01a92fb08b22491a... GitHub
• RE: Is the getAssertion whitelist necessary? Vijay Bharadwaj
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by WebAuthnBot WebAuthnBot via GitHub
• [w3c/webauthn] 87205a: Experiment with Credential object and getAssertion... GitHub
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by vijaybh Vijay Bharadwaj via GitHub

Wednesday, 20 July 2016

• Spec status Vijay Bharadwaj
• [w3c/webauthn] 5396ef: Built by Travis-CI: f734bd1884452de7fc5451908e15ce... GitHub
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by WebAuthnBot WebAuthnBot via GitHub
• [w3c/webauthn] 4c4060: Extend the signature format to also include the RP... GitHub
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by vijaybh Vijay Bharadwaj via GitHub
• [w3c/webauthn] 57378b: Built by Travis-CI: cfcd9588cd434c5dd3d2e743b07a15... GitHub
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by WebAuthnBot WebAuthnBot via GitHub
• [w3c/webauthn] 4c4060: Extend the signature format to also include the RP... GitHub
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by vijaybh Vijay Bharadwaj via GitHub
• [w3c/webauthn] 34920a: Built by Travis-CI: 4c4060a0011c3d64e54261cc4882f8... GitHub
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by WebAuthnBot WebAuthnBot via GitHub
• [w3c/webauthn] GitHub
• [w3c/webauthn] 4c4060: Extend the signature format to also include the RP... GitHub
• Closed: [webauthn] attestation unmentioned in authenticatorMakeCredential operation Vijay Bharadwaj via GitHub
• Closed: [webauthn] clarify returned values from authenticatorMakeCredential operation Vijay Bharadwaj via GitHub
• Closed: [webauthn] Security: Signature format doesn't cover whole context Vijay Bharadwaj via GitHub
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by vijaybh Vijay Bharadwaj via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Extend the signature format to also include the RP ID Vijay Bharadwaj via GitHub
• [webauthn] Secure context should be MUST not SHOULD Vijay Bharadwaj via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Remove attestation specification from spec Vijay Bharadwaj via GitHub

Tuesday, 19 July 2016

• RE: API consumer question: How do we recover Credential? Vijay Bharadwaj

Monday, 18 July 2016

• RE: Is the getAssertion whitelist necessary? Vijay Bharadwaj
• [w3c/webauthn] f13bf4: Built by Travis-CI: 7b577d46678415c7722f5d25ea3328... GitHub
• [w3c/webauthn] cf2805: Built by Travis-CI: f3cc9df06780a2ae36f7920a3f39f2... GitHub
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by WebAuthnBot WebAuthnBot via GitHub
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by WebAuthnBot WebAuthnBot via GitHub
• [w3c/webauthn] f3cc9d: Experiment with removing Credential object GitHub
• [w3c/webauthn] GitHub
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by vijaybh Vijay Bharadwaj via GitHub
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by vijaybh Vijay Bharadwaj via GitHub
• Re: API consumer question: How do we recover Credential? Dirk Balfanz
• Re: API consumer question: How do we recover Credential? Hodges, Jeff
• RE: API consumer question: How do we recover Credential? Vijay Bharadwaj
• RE: Is the getAssertion whitelist necessary? Vijay Bharadwaj

Sunday, 17 July 2016

• Re: Is the getAssertion whitelist necessary? J.C. Jones
• Re: API consumer question: How do we recover Credential? J.C. Jones

Saturday, 16 July 2016

• RE: Credential types Anthony Nadalin
• Re: Is the getAssertion whitelist necessary? Hodges, Jeff
• Re: Credential types Hodges, Jeff
• [w3c/webauthn] e3763e: Built by Travis-CI: 821173e1a40cc43331e2bbec27568f... GitHub
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by WebAuthnBot WebAuthnBot via GitHub
• [w3c/webauthn] 8e2659: Built by Travis-CI: c0e61c1280fc2e26db2b421d7cf6d8... GitHub
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by WebAuthnBot WebAuthnBot via GitHub
• [w3c/webauthn] 7b577d: API aesthetic updates (#142) GitHub
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by vijaybh Vijay Bharadwaj via GitHub
• [w3c/webauthn] 7b577d: API aesthetic updates (#142) GitHub
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by vijaybh Vijay Bharadwaj via GitHub
• [w3c/webauthn] b1d4df: Built by Travis-CI: 7b577d46678415c7722f5d25ea3328... GitHub
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by WebAuthnBot WebAuthnBot via GitHub
• [w3c/webauthn] 7b577d: API aesthetic updates (#142) GitHub
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by vijaybh Vijay Bharadwaj via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] API aesthetic updates Vijay Bharadwaj via GitHub
• RE: Is the getAssertion whitelist necessary? Vijay Bharadwaj
• RE: API consumer question: How do we recover Credential? Vijay Bharadwaj
• [w3c/webauthn] 140d68: Built by Travis-CI: 55d376463b8f5e45074a2578342f99... GitHub
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by WebAuthnBot WebAuthnBot via GitHub
• [w3c/webauthn] 29fa8e: Pin to html5lib 0.9999999 GitHub
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by vijaybh Vijay Bharadwaj via GitHub
• Is the getAssertion whitelist necessary? J.C. Jones

Friday, 15 July 2016

• Re: API consumer question: How do we recover Credential? J.C. Jones
• [w3c/webauthn] 5370b4: Tidy up line lengths GitHub
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by vijaybh Vijay Bharadwaj via GitHub
• Re: Please review: PR#144 on adding RP ID to signature format J.C. Jones
• RE: Please review: PR#144 on adding RP ID to signature format Vijay Bharadwaj
• [w3c/webauthn] bd2bbc: Built by Travis-CI: 3299eccb6c3e3196aa60bc68c4c7b4... GitHub
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by WebAuthnBot WebAuthnBot via GitHub
• [w3c/webauthn] ac2b71: moved AAGUID into packed attestation core. Removed... GitHub
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by vijaybh Vijay Bharadwaj via GitHub
• [w3c/webauthn] 9a9497: Built by Travis-CI: 29fa8ee6bb6136f23a50f478b5fabd... GitHub
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by WebAuthnBot WebAuthnBot via GitHub
• [w3c/webauthn] 29fa8e: Pin to html5lib 0.9999999 GitHub
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by jcjones J.C. Jones via GitHub
• Re: Please review: PR#144 on adding RP ID to signature format J.C. Jones
• Re: [webauthn] Extend the signature format to also include the RP ID J.C. Jones via GitHub
• AW: [webauthn] Security: Signature format doesn't cover whole context Rolf Lindemann
• Re: [webauthn] Security: Signature format doesn't cover whole context Vijay Bharadwaj via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Security: Signature format doesn't cover whole context Rolf Lindemann via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Security: Signature format doesn't cover whole context Rolf Lindemann via GitHub
• RE: Please review: PR#144 on adding RP ID to signature format Vijay Bharadwaj
• Please review: PR#144 on adding RP ID to signature format Vijay Bharadwaj
• [w3c/webauthn] 8cc3be: Clean up authenticator processing sections GitHub
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by vijaybh Vijay Bharadwaj via GitHub

Thursday, 14 July 2016

• [w3c/webauthn] 59c3cf: Built by Travis-CI: 2b671cdfbbe7b0c79d0fc0e1386c16... GitHub
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by WebAuthnBot WebAuthnBot via GitHub
• [w3c/webauthn] 2b671c: RP ID should be in clientData, so RP can validate ... GitHub
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by vijaybh Vijay Bharadwaj via GitHub
• Credential types Vijay Bharadwaj
• [w3c/webauthn] f4c957: Built by Travis-CI: 60ab05dc1e16c9b9f28195e9e3cf41... GitHub
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by WebAuthnBot WebAuthnBot via GitHub
• [w3c/webauthn] 58ca1a: Clarify getAssertion wording GitHub
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by vijaybh Vijay Bharadwaj via GitHub
• [w3c/webauthn] d98813: Built by Travis-CI: 2f690996c6fdd8f9cfc80403fe7990... GitHub
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by WebAuthnBot WebAuthnBot via GitHub
• [w3c/webauthn] 07d436: Built by Travis-CI: a338394a49d2b8237f0fbeb44c3baa... GitHub
• [w3c/webauthn] GitHub
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by WebAuthnBot WebAuthnBot via GitHub
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by vijaybh Vijay Bharadwaj via GitHub
• [w3c/webauthn] a33839: UTF-16 -> UTF-8 GitHub
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by vijaybh Vijay Bharadwaj via GitHub

Wednesday, 13 July 2016

• RE: API consumer question: How do we recover Credential? Vijay Bharadwaj
• API consumer question: How do we recover Credential? J.C. Jones
• Remove ScopedCredentialParameters tuple (by un-pairing type & algorithm) PR #143 J.C. Jones
• Re: [webauthn] Remove ScopedCredentialParameters tuple (by unpairing type & algorithm) J.C. Jones via GitHub
• [w3c/webauthn] d870e5: Built by Travis-CI: 2f690996c6fdd8f9cfc80403fe7990... GitHub
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by WebAuthnBot WebAuthnBot via GitHub
• [w3c/webauthn] 2f6909: Stop using .gitattributes from w3c/html [2] GitHub
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by jcjones J.C. Jones via GitHub
• [w3c/webauthn] ef0306: Built by Travis-CI: a525ed329df9c427ecb6b3eae0f0df... GitHub
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by WebAuthnBot WebAuthnBot via GitHub
• [w3c/webauthn] a525ed: Stop using .gitattributes from w3c/html GitHub
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by jcjones J.C. Jones via GitHub
• Re: API aesthetic updates (PR #142) J.C. Jones
• Re: [webauthn] Remove attestation specification from spec Hodges, Jeff
• Re: [webauthn] Remove attestation specification from spec Rolf Lindemann via GitHub
• Closed: [webauthn] better explain the relation between attestation models and attestation types Rolf Lindemann via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] better explain the relation between attestation models and attestation types Rolf Lindemann via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Extend the signature format to also include the RP ID balfanz via GitHub
• [w3c/webauthn] GitHub
• [w3c/webauthn] GitHub
• [w3c/webauthn] f73195: Built by Travis-CI: 0f30f4bcb68a81028e26454f626a18... GitHub
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by WebAuthnBot WebAuthnBot via GitHub
• [w3c/webauthn] a85079: Built by Travis-CI: 385fd5d7951348afe68d4a0c2fe00c... GitHub
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by WebAuthnBot WebAuthnBot via GitHub
• [w3c/webauthn] ac2b71: moved AAGUID into packed attestation core. Removed... GitHub
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by rlin1 Rolf Lindemann via GitHub
• [w3c/webauthn] 8b1697: Move attestation type definitions to their own top... GitHub
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by rlin1 Rolf Lindemann via GitHub
• [w3c/webauthn] 7a7ffd: Built by Travis-CI: a6695b22492bb0b1c19b8abe94c4b8... GitHub
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by WebAuthnBot WebAuthnBot via GitHub
• [w3c/webauthn] ef2874: Built by Travis-CI: cdb89a283a2ab047752d8c15d0357c... GitHub
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by WebAuthnBot WebAuthnBot via GitHub
• [w3c/webauthn] 640a94: Built by Travis-CI: fc897a81eec4918d82a1f9280258a5... GitHub
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by WebAuthnBot WebAuthnBot via GitHub
• [w3c/webauthn] 842616: step 1: renamed attestation type to attestation fo... GitHub
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by rlin1 Rolf Lindemann via GitHub
• [w3c/webauthn] cdb89a: reverted to original .gitattributes GitHub
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by rlin1 Rolf Lindemann via GitHub
• [w3c/webauthn] 8b1697: Move attestation type definitions to their own top... GitHub
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by rlin1 Rolf Lindemann via GitHub
• [w3c/webauthn] c8af79: Built by Travis-CI: 067d26d777d76d194012097c907209... GitHub
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by WebAuthnBot WebAuthnBot via GitHub
• [w3c/webauthn] 067d26: Extend the signature format to also include the RP... GitHub
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by vijaybh Vijay Bharadwaj via GitHub
• Re: Signal to end-user when using webauthn Arshad Noor

Tuesday, 12 July 2016

• Re: [webauthn] Attestation type identifiers lack formal definition and matching rules J.C. Jones via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Attestation type identifiers lack formal definition and matching rules Vijay Bharadwaj via GitHub
• AW: RE: PR #137 and #138 Rolf Lindemamn
• [w3c/webauthn] 1bebfa: Built by Travis-CI: d34e23f986cc9b93c143b77c3a2de0... GitHub
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by WebAuthnBot WebAuthnBot via GitHub
• Re: PR #137 and #138 J.C. Jones
• [w3c/webauthn] d34e23: Disable default binary types in .gitattributes GitHub
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by jcjones J.C. Jones via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Attestation type identifiers lack formal definition and matching rules J.C. Jones via GitHub
• Re: PR #137 and #138 J.C. Jones
• RE: PR #137 and #138 Vijay Bharadwaj
• Re: API aesthetic updates (PR #142) Hodges, Jeff
• AW: PR #137 and #138 Rolf Lindemann
• Re: [webauthn] Attestation type identifiers lack formal definition and matching rules Hodges, Jeff
• [w3c/webauthn] 352a7d: Built by Travis-CI: 81934c9801e029ba1e92b2d47ff1a5... GitHub
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by WebAuthnBot WebAuthnBot via GitHub
• [w3c/webauthn] 81934c: do not address issue #88 here - thats a separate o... GitHub
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by rlin1 Rolf Lindemann via GitHub
• RE: Signal to end-user when using webauthn Vijay Bharadwaj
• Re: Signal to end-user when using webauthn Arshad Noor

Monday, 11 July 2016

• PR #137 and #138 Vijay Bharadwaj
• RE: Signal to end-user when using webauthn Vijay Bharadwaj
• Re: [webauthn] Attestation type identifiers lack formal definition and matching rules J.C. Jones via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Attestation type identifiers lack formal definition and matching rules Vijay Bharadwaj via GitHub
• Re: Signal to end-user when using webauthn Arshad Noor
• RE: Signal to end-user when using webauthn Vijay Bharadwaj
• Re: [webauthn] Attestation type identifiers lack formal definition and matching rules J.C. Jones via GitHub
• API aesthetic updates (PR #142) J.C. Jones
• Re: Signal to end-user when using webauthn Arshad Noor

Friday, 8 July 2016

• Re: Spec "Level"s ? Hodges, Jeff
• RE: Signal to end-user when using webauthn Vijay Bharadwaj
• RE: Spec "Level"s ? Vijay Bharadwaj
• Re: Signal to end-user when using webauthn Arshad Noor

Thursday, 7 July 2016

• Re: Spec "Level"s ? Hodges, Jeff
• Re: Spec "Level"s ? Wendy Seltzer
• Spec "Level"s ? Hodges, Jeff
• Re: [webauthn] CredentialType (was: TAG review feedback: Align Credential interface with Credential Management? Hodges, Jeff
• RE: [webauthn] TAG review feedback: Align Credential interface with Credential Management? Vijay Bharadwaj
• RE: [webauthn] CredentialType (was: TAG review feedback: Align Credential interface with Credential Management? Vijay Bharadwaj
• RE: [webauthn] TAG review feedback: Align Credential interface with Credential Management? Vijay Bharadwaj
• [webauthn] CredentialType (was: TAG review feedback: Align Credential interface with Credential Management? Hodges, Jeff

Wednesday, 6 July 2016

• Re: [webauthn] TAG review feedback: Align Credential interface with Credential Management? Mike West
• TPAC - Web Authentication WG Meeting Anthony Nadalin
• Re: [webauthn] Rolf attestation types 121 Adam Powers via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] moved AAGUID into packed attestation core. Removed AAGUID extension. =JeffH via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Rolf attestation types 121 =JeffH via GitHub
• [webauthn] define "attestation" in terminology section =JeffH via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] moved AAGUID into packed attestation core. Removed AAGUID extension. Adam Powers via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Rolf attestation types 121 Vijay Bharadwaj via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] moved AAGUID into packed attestation core. Removed AAGUID extension. Vijay Bharadwaj via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Rolf attestation types 121 bifurcation via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] ScopedCredentialInfo attestation =JeffH via GitHub
• 07/06/2016 W3C Web Authentication WG Call Agenda Anthony Nadalin
• Re: [webauthn] TAG review feedback: Align Credential interface with Credential Management? Hodges, Jeff
• [webauthn] credential id privacy Axel Nennker via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] imageURL privacy Axel Nennker via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] imageURL privacy Rolf Lindemann via GitHub
• [webauthn] imageURL privacy Axel Nennker via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] TAG review feedback: Align Credential interface with Credential Management? J.C. Jones
• Re: [webauthn] TAG review feedback: Align Credential interface with Credential Management? Vijay Bharadwaj via GitHub
• RE: Signal to end-user when using webauthn Vijay Bharadwaj
• Re: Signal to end-user when using webauthn Arshad Noor

Tuesday, 5 July 2016

• Re: [webauthn] Text aesthetic updates Hodges, Jeff
• RE: Signal to end-user when using webauthn Anthony Nadalin

Monday, 4 July 2016

• [w3c/webauthn] 51dacf: Built by Travis-CI: 2c2f9095947ff2f2ca9caf6a9bac15... GitHub
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by WebAuthnBot WebAuthnBot via GitHub
• [w3c/webauthn] 8b1697: Move attestation type definitions to their own top... GitHub
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by jcjones J.C. Jones via GitHub
• Signal to end-user when using webauthn Arshad Noor

Sunday, 3 July 2016

• [w3c/webauthn] 551f4f: Built by Travis-CI: 55a7b1f62b5814f92be3c25a3b4b16... GitHub
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by WebAuthnBot WebAuthnBot via GitHub
• [w3c/webauthn] 842616: step 1: renamed attestation type to attestation fo... GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] better explain the relation between attestation models and attestation types Rolf Lindemann via GitHub
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by rlin1 Rolf Lindemann via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] better explain the relation between attestation models and attestation types Rolf Lindemann via GitHub
• [w3c/webauthn] 4452be: Built by Travis-CI: ac2b718cf0dc968bf2e9fdc0ff1b30... GitHub
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by WebAuthnBot WebAuthnBot via GitHub
• Closed: [webauthn] Move AAGUID from extension to packed attestation. WebAuthnBot via GitHub
• [w3c/webauthn] ac2b71: moved AAGUID into packed attestation core. Removed... GitHub
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by rlin1 Rolf Lindemann via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Move AAGUID from extension to packed attestation. Rolf Lindemann via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Change Android SafetyNet attestation type identifier ? Rolf Lindemann via GitHub

Friday, 1 July 2016

• Re: [webauthn] Text aesthetic updates Vijay Bharadwaj via GitHub
• RE: Text aesthetic updates (PR #135) Mike Jones

Last message date: Friday, 29 July 2016 20:47:21 UTC