- From: gmandyam via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2016 22:15:28 +0000
- To: public-webauthn@w3.org
@equalsJeffH "As far as I understand, W3C specs can, and do, reference non-W3C specifications, and so having references to TPM and Android SafetyNet should not be an issue in and of themselves. " I disagree with the premise that SafetyNet constitutes a "specification" I think we are still ignoring that SafetyNet is not defined by any recognized SDO and lacks sufficient publicly-available information to be considered a standard. A registry won't fix that, but I am not aware of any W3C specifications that reference proprietary formats. In summary, I see nothing to be gained by referencing opaque, proprietary attestation formats that do not map to a standard. That can go in a registry. -- GitHub Notification of comment by gmandyam Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/webauthn/issues/108#issuecomment-236041622 using your GitHub account
Received on Thursday, 28 July 2016 22:15:46 UTC