- From: Vijay Bharadwaj <vijaybh@microsoft.com>
- Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2016 16:27:25 +0000
- To: "jeff.hodges@kingsmountain.com" <jeff.hodges@kingsmountain.com>
- CC: W3C WebAuthn WG <public-webauthn@w3.org>
BTW we should update the terminology in that draft at the next update to be in line with the changes Rolf made recently: https://github.com/w3c/webauthn/pull/138 What used to be called attestation types are now attestation formats. Attestation types now refers to what we used to call attestation models. -----Original Message----- From: jeff.hodges@kingsmountain.com [mailto:jeff.hodges@kingsmountain.com] Sent: Thursday, July 28, 2016 3:12 AM To: Vijay Bharadwaj <vijaybh@microsoft.com> Cc: W3C WebAuthn WG <public-webauthn@w3.org> Subject: Re: wrt registries (was: Spec status) Quoting jeff.hodges@kingsmountain.com: > > We should add text to the spec referencing these to-be-created > registries -- this will hopefully keep us on the same page regarding > our plans in this regard. See.. add references to IANA WebAuthn Attestation Types and Extension Identifiers Registries https://github.com/w3c/webauthn/issues/155 hth, =JeffH
Received on Thursday, 28 July 2016 16:28:15 UTC