Re: PR #137 and #138

actually, it's causing a rebase issue for me related to PR 142, so I'm
committing the comment-out fix to master right now:

https://github.com/w3c/webauthn/commit/d34e23f986cc9b93c143b77c3a2de03209c44215

On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 10:49 AM, J.C. Jones <jc@mozilla.com> wrote:

> Hmm... I think we can pull out that attribute, as it should be re-stating
> a default. I included it because the source w3c repo had it.
>
> Anyway, feel free to commit it that way, Rolf, (or I can do a commit for
> that later.)
>
> On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 10:45 AM, Vijay Bharadwaj <vijaybh@microsoft.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Weird, I see that too.
>>
>>
>>
>> Commenting out this line in .gitattributes:
>>
>> * binary diff
>>
>>
>>
>> Makes things work properly again. For some reason the default is not
>> being overridden by the more specific *.bs rule. The weird thing is that
>> “git diff master” does work without this modification, so in some corner of
>> git’s crazy inner workings it does understand that this is a text file.
>> Maybe someone more knowledgeable about git can find a way to debug this
>> further.
>>
>>
>>
>> For now, in the interest of making forward progress, I would:
>>
>> -          Modify .gitattributes to comment out the line above
>>
>> -          Do the merge
>>
>> -          Revert the change to .gitattributes
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* Rolf Lindemann [mailto:rlindemann@noknok.com]
>> *Sent:* Tuesday, July 12, 2016 1:08 AM
>> *To:* Vijay Bharadwaj <vijaybh@microsoft.com>; 'Rolf Lindemann' <
>> rlindemann@noknok.com>
>> *Cc:* public-webauthn@w3.org
>> *Subject:* AW: PR #137 and #138
>>
>>
>>
>> Hi Vijay,
>>
>>
>>
>> I would like to do the merge but git merge is treating index.bs as *
>> *binary** file and hence doesn’t do anything helpful:
>>
>> >git merge master -v
>>
>> >warning: Cannot merge binary files: index.bs (HEAD vs. master)
>>
>>
>>
>> .gitattributes exists and contains the line
>>
>> *.bs              cleantext
>>
>>
>>
>> Do you get the same message when trying the merge?
>>
>>
>>
>> Kind regards,
>>
>>   Rolf
>>
>> *Von:* Vijay Bharadwaj [mailto:vijaybh@microsoft.com
>> <vijaybh@microsoft.com>]
>> *Gesendet:* Dienstag, 12. Juli 2016 01:42
>> *An:* Rolf Lindemann
>> *Cc:* public-webauthn@w3.org
>> *Betreff:* PR #137 and #138
>>
>>
>>
>> Rolf,
>>
>>
>>
>> It looks like you have at least two LGTMs on each of these, but the PRs
>> have conflicts that need to be resolved before they can be merged. What are
>> the next steps here?
>>
>>
>>
>> It seems like #138 can be merged as is, and #137 can be merged modulo
>> Adam’s question on the AAGUID. Perhaps an AAGUID field could also be added
>> to the TPM attestation format? The Android attestation format would not
>> seem to need such an addition as it already carries all the information
>> that one would need inside the SafetyNet response.
>>
>
>

Received on Tuesday, 12 July 2016 17:59:23 UTC