PR #137 and #138 from Vijay Bharadwaj on 2016-07-11 (public-webauthn@w3.org from July 2016)

From: Vijay Bharadwaj <vijaybh@microsoft.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2016 23:42:14 +0000
To: Rolf Lindemann <rlindemann@noknok.com>
CC: "public-webauthn@w3.org" <public-webauthn@w3.org>
Message-ID: <d4c37396a1f94dceb928d8f9bc03f807@microsoft.com>

Rolf,

It looks like you have at least two LGTMs on each of these, but the PRs have conflicts that need to be resolved before they can be merged. What are the next steps here?

It seems like #138 can be merged as is, and #137 can be merged modulo Adam's question on the AAGUID. Perhaps an AAGUID field could also be added to the TPM attestation format? The Android attestation format would not seem to need such an addition as it already carries all the information that one would need inside the SafetyNet response.

Received on Tuesday, 12 July 2016 00:01:12 UTC