- From: Mike Jones via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2016 18:33:31 +0000
- To: public-webauthn@w3.org
The comment "The other stuff can go in a registry" reflects a misunderstanding of registries - per Jeff Hodges' comments on the list. Normative content must be in a specification. Registries simply contain references to those specifications. So there's not an option to move normative content to a registry. (We can move normative content to other specifications, should we choose to, but I think that would just make things harder for developers.) Given that the SafetyNet attestation type will be widely used, if our description of it is presently inadequate, it would be my suggestion that we make it adequate, rather than deleting it. Making things that WebAuthN developers will commonly use harder to find and use would do no favors to anyone. -- GitHub Notification of comment by selfissued Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/webauthn/issues/108#issuecomment-235984654 using your GitHub account
Received on Thursday, 28 July 2016 18:33:40 UTC