Re: [webauthn] breakup IDL
Re: [webauthn] Add Android "N" attestation type.
Closed: [webauthn] Remove attestation specification from spec
Re: [webauthn] Remove attestation specification from spec
Closed: [webauthn] Add opaque data extension
Re: [webauthn] Token Binding ID: JWK -> opaque
[w3c/webauthn] 2b4d1f: Built by Travis-CI: a7817009bf82bd1ef3bca7d7c05ab3...
[webauthn] new commits pushed by WebAuthnBot
Re: [webauthn] Allow caller to pick between strict and eTLD+1 matching
[w3c/webauthn] a78170: Update index.bs with proposed location extension (...
[webauthn] new commits pushed by vijaybh
[w3c/webauthn] 2d50c2: Built by Travis-CI: 62b67c02a37ab54ca8b3c1f7606bb7...
[webauthn] new commits pushed by WebAuthnBot
[w3c/webauthn] 62b67c: Cleaned up exposition of processing rules (#154)
[w3c/webauthn]
Closed: [webauthn] Client processing steps are not aligned with authenticator model
Closed: [webauthn] Problem with authn selection extension
[webauthn] new commits pushed by vijaybh
Re: [webauthn] Adding the User Verification Mode extension as per discussions in theā¦
Re: [webauthn] Fixed spelling, grammar, and document syntax issues
[webauthn] Should rpId be removed from clientData?
[webauthn] should authenticator layer send hashed or unhashed rpId to authenticators?
[w3c/webauthn] 00fe43: move IDL frags to applicable sections. fixes #112 ...
[webauthn] new commits pushed by equalsJeffH
[w3c/webauthn] ee8715: fix xref
[webauthn] new commits pushed by equalsJeffH
08/31/2016 W3C Web Authentication WG Agenda
Call for Exclusions (Update): Web Authentication: A Web API for accessing scoped credentials
work-in-progress: jeffh-editorial-cleanups
[w3c/webauthn] 80bb3f: clarify optionality of FIDO MDS. Fixes #47.
[webauthn] new commits pushed by equalsJeffH
08/24/2016 W3C Web Authentication WG Cancelled
[webauthn] Privacy concerns with blacklist/whitelist
[webauthn] Spec draft points to wrong GitHub issues page
Proposal for W3C-style Attestation Registry
Re: [webauthn] Change Android SafetyNet attestation type identifier ?
Re: [webauthn] clarify content of algorithm member of ScopedCredentialParameters
Re: [webauthn] Section 4.3: add reference to privacy
Re: [webauthn] Section 4: Mention requirement for user to give consent for key to be used
Re: [webauthn] Silent Authn? clarification of bit 0 in AuthenticatorData
Re: [webauthn] Add opaque data extension
Re: [webauthn] clarify that at least one model of attestation must be employed
[webauthn] normalize RFC2119 language
Re: [webauthn] Relying Party or Server
[webauthn] do not entirely lose distinctions distinctions between External and Embedded Authenticators
[webauthn] do not totally lose the term "WebAuthn Relying Party"
our cloud bikeshed? (was: issues with latest bikeshed
issues with latest bikeshed
Re: [webauthn] Secure context should be MUST not SHOULD
- Re: [webauthn] Secure context should be MUST not SHOULD
- Re: [webauthn] Secure context should be MUST not SHOULD
[webauthn] Define UTF-8 string
[webauthn] lowercase form of this RP ID
[webauthn] 4.1 heading should appear before the IDL
Re: [webauthn] Problem with authn selection extension
[webauthn] clarify normality of authenticator model - is it actually authenticator API ?
[w3c/webauthn]
Re: WebAuthn API Specification Review
[webauthn] facet should be USVString
[webauthn] facet should be defined in terms of the HTML Standard
[webauthn] "web origin of the script"
[webauthn] What if callerOrigin is an opaque origin
- Re: [webauthn] What if callerOrigin is an opaque origin
- Re: [webauthn] What if callerOrigin is an opaque origin
- Re: [webauthn] What if callerOrigin is an opaque origin
[webauthn] callerOrigin
[webauthn] makeCredential() should use a dictionary
- Re: [webauthn] makeCredential() should use a dictionary
- Re: [webauthn] makeCredential() should use a dictionary
- Re: [webauthn] makeCredential() should use a dictionary
- Closed: [webauthn] makeCredential() should use a dictionary
[w3c/webauthn] 056c63: Address comments from @equalsJeffH
[webauthn] new commits pushed by vijaybh
[webauthn] also cite the other extant TLS channel binding mechanisms?
[webauthn] hostname canonicalization in {#makeCredential} section?
[w3c/webauthn]
08/17/2016 W3C Web Authentication WG Agenda
[webauthn] Consider using USVString instead of DOMString sometimes
[webauthn] DOMString[] should be FrozenArray<DOMString>
[w3c/webauthn] 615084: Token Binding ID: JWK -> opaque
[webauthn] new commits pushed by vijaybh
[webauthn] tokenBinding in ClientData should be a binary type (perhaps base64) and not JsonWebKey
[w3c/webauthn] 98fb91: Allow caller to pick between strict and eTLD+1 mat...
[w3c/webauthn]
[webauthn] new commits pushed by vijaybh
[webauthn] new commits pushed by vijaybh
[w3c/webauthn] c79e21: IDL cleanup: don't require callers to create Crede...
[webauthn] new commits pushed by vijaybh
[w3c/webauthn] 9c7d00: Fix typo (thanks Travis!)
[webauthn] new commits pushed by vijaybh
[w3c/webauthn] 966e41: Built by Travis-CI: 2b72ddfb805a4a0e2797afccea88cf...
[webauthn] new commits pushed by WebAuthnBot
[w3c/webauthn] c79e21: IDL cleanup: don't require callers to create Crede...
Re: [webauthn] IDL cleanup: don't require callers to create Credential objects
[webauthn] new commits pushed by jcjones
Re: [webauthn] Make attestation more modular
[w3c/webauthn] 212de8: Clean up attestation
[webauthn] new commits pushed by vijaybh
[webauthn] Clarify the definition of "origin"
08/10/2016 W3C Web Authentication WG Agenda
RE: returning a multi-factor authenticator's factor-in-use and protection scheme to the server - UVM extension proposal v2
[w3c/webauthn] d5b952: first draft of new proposal. See #156
[webauthn] new commits pushed by rlin1
RE: returning a multi-factor authenticator's factor-in-use and protection scheme to the server - UVM extension proposal
[webauthn] new commits pushed by vijaybh
[w3c/webauthn] c79e21: IDL cleanup: don't require callers to create Crede...
Spec status
[w3c/webauthn] 066351: TravisCI Fix: Don't update gh-pages for non-master...
[webauthn] new commits pushed by vijaybh
Re: [webauthn] Update index.bs with proposed location extension
- Re: [webauthn] Update index.bs with proposed location extension
- Re: [webauthn] Update index.bs with proposed location extension
- Re: [webauthn] Update index.bs with proposed location extension
- Re: [webauthn] Update index.bs with proposed location extension
10 August: 90 minute meeting
[webauthn] Clarify meaning of UVI
- Re: [webauthn] Clarify meaning of UVI
- Re: [webauthn] Clarify meaning of UVI
- Re: [webauthn] Clarify meaning of UVI
- Re: [webauthn] Clarify meaning of UVI
- Re: [webauthn] Clarify meaning of UVI
- Re: [webauthn] Clarify meaning of UVI
- Re: [webauthn] Clarify meaning of UVI
- Re: [webauthn] Clarify meaning of UVI
- Re: [webauthn] Clarify meaning of UVI
- Re: [webauthn] Clarify meaning of UVI
- Re: [webauthn] Clarify meaning of UVI
- Re: [webauthn] Clarify meaning of UVI
- Re: [webauthn] Clarify meaning of UVI
- Re: [webauthn] Clarify meaning of UVI
Re: [webauthn] Cleaned up exposition of processing rules
- Re: [webauthn] Cleaned up exposition of processing rules
- Re: [webauthn] Cleaned up exposition of processing rules
- Re: [webauthn] Cleaned up exposition of processing rules
- Re: [webauthn] Cleaned up exposition of processing rules
- Re: [webauthn] Cleaned up exposition of processing rules