public-webauthn@w3.org from August 2016 by author

=JeffH via GitHub

Closed: [webauthn] Remove attestation specification from spec (Wednesday, 31 August)
Re: [webauthn] Remove attestation specification from spec (Wednesday, 31 August)
Re: [webauthn] Token Binding ID: JWK -> opaque (Wednesday, 31 August)
Re: [webauthn] Adding the User Verification Mode extension as per discussions in the… (Wednesday, 31 August)
Re: [webauthn] Secure context should be MUST not SHOULD (Wednesday, 31 August)
Re: [webauthn] Fixed spelling, grammar, and document syntax issues (Wednesday, 31 August)
Re: [webauthn] Cleaned up exposition of processing rules (Wednesday, 31 August)
[webauthn] Should rpId be removed from clientData? (Wednesday, 31 August)
[webauthn] should authenticator layer send hashed or unhashed rpId to authenticators? (Tuesday, 30 August)
[webauthn] new commits pushed by equalsJeffH (Tuesday, 30 August)
[webauthn] new commits pushed by equalsJeffH (Tuesday, 30 August)
Re: [webauthn] 4.1 heading should appear before the IDL (Tuesday, 30 August)
Closed: [webauthn] makeCredential() should use a dictionary (Monday, 29 August)
Re: [webauthn] makeCredential() should use a dictionary (Monday, 29 August)
[webauthn] new commits pushed by equalsJeffH (Sunday, 28 August)
Re: [webauthn] Change Android SafetyNet attestation type identifier ? (Monday, 22 August)
Re: [webauthn] clarify content of algorithm member of ScopedCredentialParameters (Monday, 22 August)
Re: [webauthn] Section 4.3: add reference to privacy (Monday, 22 August)
Re: [webauthn] Section 4: Mention requirement for user to give consent for key to be used (Monday, 22 August)
Re: [webauthn] Silent Authn? clarification of bit 0 in AuthenticatorData (Monday, 22 August)
Re: [webauthn] Add opaque data extension (Monday, 22 August)
Re: [webauthn] clarify that at least one model of attestation must be employed (Monday, 22 August)
[webauthn] normalize RFC2119 language (Monday, 22 August)
Re: [webauthn] Relying Party or Server (Monday, 22 August)
[webauthn] do not entirely lose distinctions distinctions between External and Embedded Authenticators (Monday, 22 August)
Re: [webauthn] do not totally lose the term "WebAuthn Relying Party" (Monday, 22 August)
[webauthn] do not totally lose the term "WebAuthn Relying Party" (Monday, 22 August)
Re: [webauthn] callerOrigin (Thursday, 18 August)
Re: [webauthn] facet should be USVString (Thursday, 18 August)
Re: [webauthn] Consider using USVString instead of DOMString sometimes (Thursday, 18 August)
Re: [webauthn] What if callerOrigin is an opaque origin (Thursday, 18 August)
Re: [webauthn] makeCredential() should use a dictionary (Thursday, 18 August)
Re: [webauthn] DOMString[] should be FrozenArray<DOMString> (Thursday, 18 August)
Re: [webauthn] Problem with authn selection extension (Thursday, 18 August)
Re: [webauthn] clarify normality of authenticator model - is it actually authenticator API ? (Thursday, 18 August)
[webauthn] clarify normality of authenticator model - is it actually authenticator API ? (Wednesday, 17 August)
Re: [webauthn] Cleaned up exposition of processing rules (Wednesday, 17 August)
Re: [webauthn] Cleaned up exposition of processing rules (Tuesday, 16 August)
Re: [webauthn] also cite the other extant TLS channel binding mechanisms? (Tuesday, 16 August)
[webauthn] also cite the other extant TLS channel binding mechanisms? (Tuesday, 16 August)
Re: [webauthn] hostname canonicalization in {#makeCredential} section? (Tuesday, 16 August)
[webauthn] hostname canonicalization in {#makeCredential} section? (Tuesday, 16 August)
Re: [webauthn] IDL cleanup: don't require callers to create Credential objects (Tuesday, 16 August)
Re: [webauthn] Cleaned up exposition of processing rules (Wednesday, 3 August)

Alexei Czeskis via GitHub

Re: [webauthn] Cleaned up exposition of processing rules (Wednesday, 24 August)

Andrei-Popov via GitHub

Re: [webauthn] tokenBinding in ClientData should be a binary type (perhaps base64) and not JsonWebKey (Friday, 12 August)

Anne van Kesteren via GitHub

[webauthn] Define UTF-8 string (Thursday, 18 August)
[webauthn] lowercase form of this RP ID (Thursday, 18 August)
[webauthn] 4.1 heading should appear before the IDL (Thursday, 18 August)
Re: [webauthn] makeCredential() should use a dictionary (Thursday, 18 August)
Re: [webauthn] callerOrigin (Thursday, 18 August)
Re: [webauthn] facet should be defined in terms of the HTML Standard (Wednesday, 17 August)
[webauthn] facet should be USVString (Wednesday, 17 August)
[webauthn] facet should be defined in terms of the HTML Standard (Wednesday, 17 August)
[webauthn] "web origin of the script" (Wednesday, 17 August)
Re: [webauthn] What if callerOrigin is an opaque origin (Wednesday, 17 August)
Re: [webauthn] What if callerOrigin is an opaque origin (Wednesday, 17 August)
[webauthn] What if callerOrigin is an opaque origin (Wednesday, 17 August)
[webauthn] callerOrigin (Wednesday, 17 August)
[webauthn] makeCredential() should use a dictionary (Wednesday, 17 August)

Anthony Nadalin

08/31/2016 W3C Web Authentication WG Agenda (Tuesday, 30 August)
08/24/2016 W3C Web Authentication WG Cancelled (Wednesday, 24 August)
08/17/2016 W3C Web Authentication WG Agenda (Tuesday, 16 August)
RE: 08/10/2016 W3C Web Authentication WG Agenda (Wednesday, 10 August)
RE: 08/10/2016 W3C Web Authentication WG Agenda (Wednesday, 10 August)
08/10/2016 W3C Web Authentication WG Agenda (Tuesday, 9 August)
RE: 10 August: 90 minute meeting (Wednesday, 3 August)
08/03/2106 W3C WebAuthentication WG Agenda (Tuesday, 2 August)
RE: returning a multi-factor authenticator's factor-in-use and protection scheme to the server (Monday, 1 August)

Anthony Nadalin via GitHub

Re: [webauthn] Clarify meaning of UVI (Monday, 8 August)

balfanz via GitHub

Re: [webauthn] Allow caller to pick between strict and eTLD+1 matching (Wednesday, 31 August)

Brad Hill via GitHub

[webauthn] Privacy concerns with blacklist/whitelist (Wednesday, 24 August)
[webauthn] Spec draft points to wrong GitHub issues page (Wednesday, 24 August)

Dirk Balfanz

Re: wrt deprecating eTLD+1 (was: Can we remove the PSL dependency?) (Monday, 8 August)
Re: 10 August: 90 minute meeting (Wednesday, 3 August)

Domenic Denicola via GitHub

[webauthn] Consider using USVString instead of DOMString sometimes (Tuesday, 16 August)
[webauthn] DOMString[] should be FrozenArray<DOMString> (Tuesday, 16 August)

Ghosh, Rahuldeva

RE: returning a multi-factor authenticator's factor-in-use and protection scheme to the server - UVM extension proposal v2 (Tuesday, 9 August)
RE: returning a multi-factor authenticator's factor-in-use and protection scheme to the server - UVM extension proposal (Monday, 8 August)
RE: returning a multi-factor authenticator's factor-in-use and protection scheme to the server - UVM extension proposal (Monday, 8 August)
RE: returning a multi-factor authenticator's factor-in-use and protection scheme to the server (Wednesday, 3 August)

GitHub

[w3c/webauthn] 2b4d1f: Built by Travis-CI: a7817009bf82bd1ef3bca7d7c05ab3... (Wednesday, 31 August)
[w3c/webauthn] a78170: Update index.bs with proposed location extension (... (Wednesday, 31 August)
[w3c/webauthn] 2d50c2: Built by Travis-CI: 62b67c02a37ab54ca8b3c1f7606bb7... (Wednesday, 31 August)
[w3c/webauthn] 62b67c: Cleaned up exposition of processing rules (#154) (Wednesday, 31 August)
[w3c/webauthn] (Wednesday, 31 August)
[w3c/webauthn] 00fe43: move IDL frags to applicable sections. fixes #112 ... (Tuesday, 30 August)
[w3c/webauthn] ee8715: fix xref (Tuesday, 30 August)
[w3c/webauthn] 80bb3f: clarify optionality of FIDO MDS. Fixes #47. (Sunday, 28 August)
[w3c/webauthn] (Wednesday, 17 August)
[w3c/webauthn] 056c63: Address comments from @equalsJeffH (Wednesday, 17 August)
[w3c/webauthn] (Tuesday, 16 August)
[w3c/webauthn] 615084: Token Binding ID: JWK -> opaque (Monday, 15 August)
[w3c/webauthn] 98fb91: Allow caller to pick between strict and eTLD+1 mat... (Wednesday, 10 August)
[w3c/webauthn] (Wednesday, 10 August)
[w3c/webauthn] c79e21: IDL cleanup: don't require callers to create Crede... (Wednesday, 10 August)
[w3c/webauthn] 9c7d00: Fix typo (thanks Travis!) (Wednesday, 10 August)
[w3c/webauthn] 966e41: Built by Travis-CI: 2b72ddfb805a4a0e2797afccea88cf... (Wednesday, 10 August)
[w3c/webauthn] c79e21: IDL cleanup: don't require callers to create Crede... (Wednesday, 10 August)
[w3c/webauthn] 212de8: Clean up attestation (Wednesday, 10 August)
[w3c/webauthn] d5b952: first draft of new proposal. See #156 (Monday, 8 August)
[w3c/webauthn] c79e21: IDL cleanup: don't require callers to create Crede... (Thursday, 4 August)
[w3c/webauthn] 066351: TravisCI Fix: Don't update gh-pages for non-master... (Thursday, 4 August)

gmandyam via GitHub

Re: [webauthn] Add Android "N" attestation type. (Wednesday, 31 August)
Re: [webauthn] Add opaque data extension (Wednesday, 31 August)
Closed: [webauthn] Add opaque data extension (Wednesday, 31 August)
Re: [webauthn] Update index.bs with proposed location extension (Tuesday, 30 August)
Re: [webauthn] Make attestation more modular (Wednesday, 10 August)
Re: [webauthn] Clarify meaning of UVI (Monday, 8 August)
Re: [webauthn] Clarify meaning of UVI (Monday, 8 August)
Re: [webauthn] Clarify meaning of UVI (Sunday, 7 August)
Re: [webauthn] Update index.bs with proposed location extension (Thursday, 4 August)
Re: [webauthn] Update index.bs with proposed location extension (Thursday, 4 August)

Hodges, Jeff

work-in-progress: jeffh-editorial-cleanups (Sunday, 28 August)
our cloud bikeshed? (was: issues with latest bikeshed (Thursday, 18 August)
issues with latest bikeshed (Thursday, 18 August)
Re: 08/10/2016 W3C Web Authentication WG Agenda (Wednesday, 10 August)

J.C. Jones

Re: our cloud bikeshed? (was: issues with latest bikeshed (Thursday, 18 August)
Re: issues with latest bikeshed (Thursday, 18 August)

J.C. Jones via GitHub

Re: [webauthn] breakup IDL (Wednesday, 31 August)
Re: [webauthn] Token Binding ID: JWK -> opaque (Wednesday, 31 August)
Re: [webauthn] Allow caller to pick between strict and eTLD+1 matching (Wednesday, 31 August)
Re: [webauthn] Update index.bs with proposed location extension (Tuesday, 30 August)
Re: [webauthn] Cleaned up exposition of processing rules (Wednesday, 17 August)
Re: [webauthn] IDL cleanup: don't require callers to create Credential objects (Wednesday, 10 August)
[webauthn] new commits pushed by jcjones (Wednesday, 10 August)
[webauthn] Clarify the definition of "origin" (Wednesday, 10 August)
Re: [webauthn] Update index.bs with proposed location extension (Thursday, 4 August)

jeff.hodges@kingsmountain.com

RE: draft-hodges-webauthn-registries-00 (Tuesday, 2 August)
Re: Can we remove the PSL dependency? (Tuesday, 2 August)
Re: wrt deprecating eTLD+1 (was: Can we remove the PSL dependency?) (Tuesday, 2 August)

Mandyam, Giridhar

RE: [webauthn] Add Android "N" attestation type. (Wednesday, 31 August)
RE: Proposal for W3C-style Attestation Registry (Wednesday, 24 August)
Proposal for W3C-style Attestation Registry (Tuesday, 23 August)
RE: Spec status (Friday, 5 August)
Proposal for a Location Extension, rev 4 (Tuesday, 2 August)

Mike Jones

RE: [webauthn] Add Android "N" attestation type. (Wednesday, 31 August)

Mike West via GitHub

Re: [webauthn] Secure context should be MUST not SHOULD (Thursday, 18 August)
Re: [webauthn] Secure context should be MUST not SHOULD (Thursday, 18 August)

r12a

Re: WebAuthn API Specification Review (Wednesday, 17 August)

Richard Barnes

Re: wrt deprecating eTLD+1 (was: Can we remove the PSL dependency?) (Tuesday, 2 August)

Rolf Lindemann

AW: returning a multi-factor authenticator's factor-in-use and protection scheme to the server - UVM extension proposal v2 (Wednesday, 10 August)

Rolf Lindemann via GitHub

Re: [webauthn] Make attestation more modular (Wednesday, 10 August)
Re: [webauthn] Clarify meaning of UVI (Monday, 8 August)
Re: [webauthn] Clarify meaning of UVI (Monday, 8 August)
[webauthn] new commits pushed by rlin1 (Monday, 8 August)
Re: [webauthn] Clarify meaning of UVI (Monday, 8 August)
Re: [webauthn] Clarify meaning of UVI (Monday, 8 August)
Re: [webauthn] Clarify meaning of UVI (Friday, 5 August)
Re: [webauthn] Clarify meaning of UVI (Friday, 5 August)
Re: [webauthn] Clarify meaning of UVI (Friday, 5 August)
Re: [webauthn] Clarify meaning of UVI (Friday, 5 August)
[webauthn] Clarify meaning of UVI (Wednesday, 3 August)

Samuel Weiler

10 August: 90 minute meeting (Wednesday, 3 August)

Vijay Bharadwaj

RE: returning a multi-factor authenticator's factor-in-use and protection scheme to the server - UVM extension proposal v2 (Wednesday, 10 August)
RE: 08/10/2016 W3C Web Authentication WG Agenda (Wednesday, 10 August)
RE: 08/10/2016 W3C Web Authentication WG Agenda (Wednesday, 10 August)
RE: returning a multi-factor authenticator's factor-in-use and protection scheme to the server - UVM extension proposal (Monday, 8 August)
RE: returning a multi-factor authenticator's factor-in-use and protection scheme to the server - UVM extension proposal (Monday, 8 August)
RE: Spec status (Thursday, 4 August)
Spec status (Thursday, 4 August)
RE: returning a multi-factor authenticator's factor-in-use and protection scheme to the server (Wednesday, 3 August)
RE: Proposal for a Location Extension, rev 4 (Wednesday, 3 August)
RE: 08/03/2106 W3C WebAuthentication WG Agenda (Wednesday, 3 August)

Vijay Bharadwaj via GitHub

[webauthn] new commits pushed by vijaybh (Wednesday, 31 August)
Closed: [webauthn] Problem with authn selection extension (Wednesday, 31 August)
Closed: [webauthn] Client processing steps are not aligned with authenticator model (Wednesday, 31 August)
[webauthn] new commits pushed by vijaybh (Wednesday, 31 August)
[webauthn] new commits pushed by vijaybh (Wednesday, 17 August)
[webauthn] new commits pushed by vijaybh (Monday, 15 August)
[webauthn] tokenBinding in ClientData should be a binary type (perhaps base64) and not JsonWebKey (Friday, 12 August)
[webauthn] new commits pushed by vijaybh (Wednesday, 10 August)
[webauthn] new commits pushed by vijaybh (Wednesday, 10 August)
[webauthn] new commits pushed by vijaybh (Wednesday, 10 August)
[webauthn] new commits pushed by vijaybh (Wednesday, 10 August)
[webauthn] new commits pushed by vijaybh (Wednesday, 10 August)
Re: [webauthn] Clarify meaning of UVI (Monday, 8 August)
Re: [webauthn] Clarify meaning of UVI (Friday, 5 August)
[webauthn] new commits pushed by vijaybh (Thursday, 4 August)
[webauthn] new commits pushed by vijaybh (Thursday, 4 August)

WebAuthnBot via GitHub

[webauthn] new commits pushed by WebAuthnBot (Wednesday, 31 August)
[webauthn] new commits pushed by WebAuthnBot (Wednesday, 31 August)
[webauthn] new commits pushed by WebAuthnBot (Wednesday, 10 August)

Wendy Seltzer

Re: Proposal for W3C-style Attestation Registry (Wednesday, 24 August)
Patent exclusions (Re: 08/17/2016 W3C Web Authentication WG Agenda) (Wednesday, 17 August)

Xueyuan Jia

Call for Exclusions (Update): Web Authentication: A Web API for accessing scoped credentials (Tuesday, 30 August)

Last message date: Wednesday, 31 August 2016 20:47:22 UTC