W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webauthn@w3.org > August 2016

RE: 08/10/2016 W3C Web Authentication WG Agenda

From: Anthony Nadalin <tonynad@microsoft.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2016 16:03:40 +0000
To: "Hodges, Jeff" <jeff.hodges@paypal.com>, Vijay Bharadwaj <vijaybh@microsoft.com>
CC: W3C Web Authn WG <public-webauthn@w3.org>
Message-ID: <DM5PR03MB2441A30541DBFAE640D6D3FEA61D0@DM5PR03MB2441.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
Don't forget that we will allocate 60 min for core issues and 30 min for non-core issues

From: Anthony Nadalin
Sent: Wednesday, August 10, 2016 9:03 AM
To: 'Hodges, Jeff' <jeff.hodges@paypal.com>; Vijay Bharadwaj <vijaybh@microsoft.com>
Cc: W3C Web Authn WG <public-webauthn@w3.org>
Subject: RE: 08/10/2016 W3C Web Authentication WG Agenda


Here is the updated agenda for the 08/10/2016 W3C Web Authentication WG



1.      Roll call

2.      Select Scribe

3.      Open Core Issues

a.      eTLD + 1

b.      Set timeline for review and agree on a approach for handling the Credential object (PR 159 / PR 158 / other?)

c.      Walk through PR 154 (processing rules exposition) and set timeline for reviews

d.      Walk through attestation changes (I will send this out shortly) and set timeline for reviews

4.      Open non-core Issue

a.      Extensions

b.      New extension proposals

5.      Any other business

6.      Adjourn



-----Original Message-----
From: Hodges, Jeff [mailto:jeff.hodges@paypal.com]
Sent: Wednesday, August 10, 2016 7:49 AM
To: Vijay Bharadwaj <vijaybh@microsoft.com<mailto:vijaybh@microsoft.com>>; Anthony Nadalin <tonynad@microsoft.com<mailto:tonynad@microsoft.com>>
Cc: W3C Web Authn WG <public-webauthn@w3.org<mailto:public-webauthn@w3.org>>
Subject: Re: 08/10/2016 W3C Web Authentication WG Agenda



am back from PTO+IETF and have a few comments/builds on Vijay's agenda suggestions...



On 8/9/16, 9:48 PM, "Vijay Bharadwaj" <vijaybh@microsoft.com<mailto:vijaybh@microsoft.com>> wrote:

>Can we discuss some of the core spec issues and put them to bed before

>going into extensions?



agreed.



>

>- eTLD + 1



yep



>- Sign off on an approach for handling the Credential object (PR 159 /

>PR

>158 / other?)



can we please change the above to "set timeline for reviews"?  I am still reviewing the proposals, and there's been no discussion on-list (also, I have not had a chance to reivew the recent webauthn concall minutes as yet).



>- Walk through PR 154 (processing rules exposition) and set timeline

>for reviews

>- Walk through attestation changes (I will send this out shortly) and

>set timeline for reviews



the above sounds reasonable.





also, unfortunately, I have meeting conflicts this morning and will likely need to drop off the call early.



thanks, HTH,



=JeffH







>

>From: Anthony Nadalin [mailto:tonynad@microsoft.com]

>Sent: Tuesday, August 09, 2016 1:21 PM

>To: W3C Web Authn WG <public-webauthn@w3.org<mailto:public-webauthn@w3.org>>

>Subject: 08/10/2016 W3C Web Authentication WG Agenda

>

>

>

>Here is the agenda for the 08/10/2016 W3C Web Authentication WG

>

>1.

>Roll Call, use IRC to log your attendance

>2.

>Pick a scribe

>3.

>Open Issues

>a.

>eTLD+1

>b.

>Extensions (UVM/UVI)

>c.

>Any others

>4.

>Specification Status

>5.

>Adjourn

>

>

>
Received on Wednesday, 10 August 2016 16:04:11 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 18:58:25 UTC