[Bug 5542] How are SML URIs absolutized
SML 1.1 last call draft ready, requesting response from you on August bare name consensus
[Bug 5998] New: second LC draft publication related editorial changes
[Bug 5741] 4.3.1 SML URI Reference Scheme item 2 - clarify relationship to rfc 3986 and terminology
[Bug 5741] 4.3.1 SML URI Reference Scheme item 2 - clarify relationship to rfc 3986 and terminology
[Bug 5600] request for additional examples
bug 5741 draft
[Bug 5542] How are SML URIs absolutized
[Bug 5600] request for additional examples
[Bug 5542] How are SML URIs absolutized
5600 request for additional examples
Schema files for current draft for use by COSMOS
- RE: Schema files for current draft for use by COSMOS
[w3c sml][agenda] 2008-08-28 SML
proposed fix for 5741
[w3c sml] [minutes] 2008-08-21 Teleconf minutes
[Bug 5543] SML URI seems overconstrained
[Bug 5980] New: SML The responsibility division between 4.3.1 and 4.3.1.1 are not very clear.
[Bug 5797] SML validity appeal to schema-validity is underspecified
[Bug 5543] SML URI seems overconstrained
[Bug 5922] Allow an instance document to not be bound to any schema
[Bug 5797] SML validity appeal to schema-validity is underspecified
[Bug 5543] SML URI seems overconstrained
[Bug 5542] How are SML URIs absolutized
[Bug 5543] SML URI seems overconstrained
[Bug 5543] SML URI seems overconstrained
[Bug 5543] SML URI seems overconstrained
Re: proposal text for 5741
[Bug 5797] SML validity appeal to schema-validity is underspecified
[Bug 5797] SML validity appeal to schema-validity is underspecified
[Bug 5797] SML validity appeal to schema-validity is underspecified
- RE: [Bug 5797] SML validity appeal to schema-validity is underspecified
- RE: [Bug 5797] SML validity appeal to schema-validity is underspecified