Re: [w3c sml] Bug 5922 resolution - please review

Agreed, my paste from IRC was less clear than it could have been.
I just updated the bug to try and clarify, and to point to this thread on 
the public alias as confirmation of the wg's interpretation.

Best Regards, John

Street address: 2455 South Road, P328 Poughkeepsie, NY USA 12601
Voice: 1+845-435-9470      Fax: 1+845-432-9787



From:
"Smith, Virginia (HP Software)" <virginia.smith@hp.com>
To:
"public-sml@w3.org" <public-sml@w3.org>
Date:
08/12/2008 07:10 PM
Subject:
[w3c sml] Bug 5922 resolution - please review



I want to make sure we all agree on the resolution of 
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=5922. The last comment on 
the bug is misleading.
 
Comment #1 states that there are 2 proposals but, in fact, it is one 
proposal that has 2 parts. This is what the minutes state also. So both 
parts, marked Proposal 1 and proposal 2, will be implemented. The second 
part (proposal 2) has 2 alternatives that the editors will work out.
 
If anyone disagrees with this, speak up asap!
 
--
ginny