RE: [w3c sml] Bug 5922 resolution - please review

The following statement:

 

So both parts, marked Proposal 1 and proposal 2, will be implemented.
The second part (proposal 2) has 2 alternatives that the editors will
work out.

 

Is how I recall the discussion.

 

Kirk Wilson, Ph.D.

Research Staff Member, CA Labs

603 823-7146 (preferred)

Cell:  603 991-8873

 

This e-mail may contain information that is privileged or confidential.
If you are not the intended recipient of this communication, please
delete this e-mail and notify the sender immediately.

________________________________

From: public-sml-request@w3.org [mailto:public-sml-request@w3.org] On
Behalf Of Smith, Virginia (HP Software)
Sent: Tuesday, August 12, 2008 7:09 PM
To: public-sml@w3.org
Subject: [w3c sml] Bug 5922 resolution - please review

 

I want to make sure we all agree on the resolution of
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=5922. The last comment on
the bug is misleading.

 

Comment #1 states that there are 2 proposals but, in fact, it is one
proposal that has 2 parts. This is what the minutes state also. So both
parts, marked Proposal 1 and proposal 2, will be implemented. The second
part (proposal 2) has 2 alternatives that the editors will work out.

 

If anyone disagrees with this, speak up asap!

 

--

ginny

 

Received on Tuesday, 12 August 2008 23:16:59 UTC