RE: proposed fix for 5741

I am ok with either "URI reference" or "URI-reference".

Sandy, do you have a comment on 2.c.iii ?

From: Smith, Virginia (HP Software) []
Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2008 9:55 PM
To: Kumar Pandit;
Subject: RE: proposed fix for 5741

I am ok as follows:

-          URI-reference should be "URI reference" as in the original text. While it is true that the text in RFC 3986 uses "URI-reference", I think that is a result of the grammar reference. The section title is "URI reference". Looking at RFC 3987 we do not see that '-' used in URI reference or IRI reference. And I don't see the '-' used elsewhere also. See

-          I defer to Sandy on 2.c.iii (implementation variances ok?)

From: [] On Behalf Of Kumar Pandit
Sent: Monday, August 25, 2008 9:57 PM
Cc: Kumar Pandit
Subject: proposed fix for 5741

Here is a diff for the proposed fix for 5741. Please take a look and let me know if you agree (or disagree) with it. I would like to get closure on it before the Thu call if possible. Thanks for your cooperation.

Received on Wednesday, 27 August 2008 05:53:17 UTC