public-script-coord@w3.org from January to March 2016 by author

Adrian Bateman

• RE: [SecureContext] - throw or hide (Monday, 21 March)

Anne van Kesteren

• Re: [SecureContext] - throw or hide (Monday, 21 March)
• Re: [SecureContext] - throw or hide (Monday, 21 March)
• Re: [SecureContext] - throw or hide (Monday, 21 March)

Boris Zbarsky

• Re: [SecureContext] - throw or hide (Monday, 21 March)
• Re: [SecureContext] - throw or hide (Monday, 21 March)
• Re: [SecureContext] - throw or hide (Monday, 21 March)
• Re: [SecureContext] - throw or hide (Monday, 21 March)
• Re: [SecureContext] - throw or hide (Monday, 21 March)

bugzilla@jessica.w3.org

• [Bug 28798] Make BufferSource more convenient to use (Wednesday, 16 March)
• [Bug 24652] Deal with associated global / Realm (Monday, 14 March)
• [Bug 17713] Exceptions thrown from event handlers should not be propagated (Monday, 14 March)
• [Bug 22320] Form's supported property names should perhaps not be enumerable (Sunday, 6 March)
• [Bug 22705] createImageBitmap in WorkerGlobalScope can only take a subset ImageBitmapSource types (Sunday, 6 March)
• [Bug 28244] Requiring @@toStringTag on instances may have performance implications (Friday, 26 February)
• [Bug 23033] Requesting PermissionDeniedError to be added (Monday, 22 February)
• [Bug 29450] New: perform a security check does not need realm argument (Friday, 12 February)
• [Bug 28798] Make BufferSource more convenient to use (Thursday, 11 February)
• [Bug 28798] Make BufferSource more convenient to use (Thursday, 11 February)
• [Bug 28798] Make BufferSource more convenient to use (Thursday, 11 February)
• [Bug 28798] Make BufferSource more convenient to use (Thursday, 11 February)
• [Bug 28798] Make BufferSource more convenient to use (Thursday, 11 February)
• [Bug 29421] Should getters on a global without an explicit 'this' really throw TypeError? (Thursday, 11 February)
• [Bug 28798] Make BufferSource more convenient to use (Thursday, 11 February)
• [Bug 18547] Make all IDL methods/attributes have [ImplicitThis] behavior, and then get rid of [ImplicitThis] (Thursday, 11 February)
• [Bug 28798] Make BufferSource more convenient to use (Thursday, 11 February)
• [Bug 29421] Should getters on a global without an explicit 'this' really throw TypeError? (Thursday, 11 February)
• [Bug 29421] Should getters on a global without an explicit 'this' really throw TypeError? (Thursday, 11 February)
• [Bug 29421] Should getters on a global without an explicit 'this' really throw TypeError? (Thursday, 11 February)
• [Bug 29386] Account for WindowProxy (window proxy) (Thursday, 11 February)
• [Bug 29421] Should getters on a global without an explicit 'this' really throw TypeError? (Thursday, 11 February)
• [Bug 22346] Security: Check origins when invoking a method, getter, or setter on an object using the property descriptor of another (Thursday, 11 February)
• [Bug 22346] Security: Check origins when invoking a method, getter, or setter on an object using the property descriptor of another (Thursday, 11 February)
• [Bug 28798] Make BufferSource more convenient to use (Thursday, 11 February)
• [Bug 28798] Make BufferSource more convenient to use (Thursday, 11 February)
• [Bug 28798] Make BufferSource more convenient to use (Thursday, 11 February)
• [Bug 28798] Make BufferSource more convenient to use (Thursday, 11 February)
• [Bug 28798] Make BufferSource more convenient to use (Thursday, 11 February)
• [Bug 28798] Make BufferSource more convenient to use (Thursday, 11 February)
• [Bug 28798] Make BufferSource more convenient to use (Thursday, 11 February)
• [Bug 28798] Make BufferSource more convenient to use (Thursday, 11 February)
• [Bug 28798] Indicate BufferSource algorithms can throw (Wednesday, 10 February)
• [Bug 28798] Indicate BufferSource algorithms can throw (Tuesday, 9 February)
• [Bug 28798] Indicate BufferSource algorithms can throw (Tuesday, 9 February)
• [Bug 18547] Make all IDL methods have [ImplicitThis] behavior, and then get rid of [ImplicitThis] (Monday, 8 February)
• [Bug 18547] Make all IDL methods have [ImplicitThis] behavior, and then get rid of [ImplicitThis] (Monday, 8 February)
• [Bug 29421] Should getters on a global without an explicit 'this' really throw TypeError? (Monday, 8 February)
• [Bug 29421] Should getters on a global without an explicit 'this' really throw TypeError? (Friday, 5 February)
• [Bug 29421] Should getters on a global without an explicit 'this' really throw TypeError? (Friday, 5 February)
• [Bug 29421] Should getters on a global without an explicit 'this' really throw TypeError? (Friday, 5 February)
• [Bug 29421] Should getters on a global without an explicit 'this' really throw TypeError? (Friday, 5 February)
• [Bug 29421] Should getters on a global without an explicit 'this' really throw TypeError? (Friday, 5 February)
• [Bug 29421] Should getters on a global without an explicit 'this' really throw TypeError? (Friday, 5 February)
• [Bug 29421] New: Should getters on a global without an explicit 'this' really throw TypeError? (Friday, 5 February)
• [Bug 27048] Allow partial enums (Thursday, 4 February)
• [Bug 29418] PlatformObjectGetOwnProperty's ignoreNamedProps feature (Thursday, 4 February)
• [Bug 29418] PlatformObjectGetOwnProperty's ignoreNamedProps feature (Thursday, 4 February)
• [Bug 29418] New: PlatformObjectGetOwnProperty's ignoreNamedProps feature (Thursday, 4 February)
• [Bug 27701] Enum should be allowed to end with comma (Thursday, 4 February)
• [Bug 29383] Need a way to define toJSON, valueOf, @@toPrimitive (Friday, 29 January)
• [Bug 29183] Objects that implement an [Unforgeable] interface should have a non-configurable @@toPrimitive method (Friday, 29 January)
• [Bug 29383] Need a way to define toJSON, valueOf, @@toPrimitive (Friday, 29 January)
• [Bug 27361] [Unforgeable] and "[[Enumerable]]: true" (Friday, 29 January)
• [Bug 29384] Remove [Unforgeable] for interfaces (Friday, 29 January)
• [Bug 29383] Need a way to define toJSON, valueOf, @@toPrimitive (Friday, 29 January)
• [Bug 29383] Need a way to define toJSON, valueOf, @@toPrimitive (Friday, 29 January)
• [Bug 28798] Indicate BufferSource algorithms can throw (Thursday, 28 January)
• [Bug 28798] Indicate BufferSource algorithms can throw (Thursday, 28 January)
• [Bug 22346] Security: Check origins when invoking a method, getter, or setter on an object using the property descriptor of another (Friday, 22 January)
• [Bug 28798] Indicate BufferSource algorithms can throw (Friday, 22 January)
• [Bug 29383] Need a way to define toJSON, valueOf, @@toPrimitive (Friday, 22 January)
• [Bug 29388] Attribute to prevent calls to function passing TypedArray w/ backing SharedArrayBuffer (Friday, 22 January)
• [Bug 29388] Attribute to prevent calls to function passing TypedArray w/ backing SharedArrayBuffer (Friday, 22 January)
• [Bug 29388] Attribute to prevent calls to function passing TypedArray w/ backing SharedArrayBuffer (Friday, 22 January)
• [Bug 29388] Attribute to prevent calls to function passing TypedArray w/ backing SharedArrayBuffer (Friday, 22 January)
• [Bug 29388] Attribute to prevent calls to function passing TypedArray w/ backing SharedArrayBuffer (Friday, 22 January)
• [Bug 29388] New: Attribute to prevent calls to function passing TypedArray w/ backing SharedArrayBuffer (Thursday, 21 January)
• [Bug 29386] New: Account for WindowProxy (window proxy) (Wednesday, 20 January)
• [Bug 29376] Need an abstract operation for "is this an IDL-defined property" (Wednesday, 20 January)
• [Bug 29383] Need a way to define toJSON, valueOf, @@toPrimitive (Wednesday, 20 January)
• [Bug 29384] New: Remove [Unforgeable] for interfaces (Wednesday, 20 January)
• [Bug 29183] Objects that implement an [Unforgeable] interface should have a non-configurable @@toPrimitive method (Wednesday, 20 January)
• [Bug 27361] [Unforgeable] and "[[Enumerable]]: true" (Wednesday, 20 January)
• [Bug 29383] New: Need a way to define toJSON, valueOf, @@toPrimitive (Wednesday, 20 January)
• [Bug 22346] Security: Check origins when invoking a method, getter, or setter on an object using the property descriptor of another (Wednesday, 20 January)
• [Bug 22346] Security: Check origins when invoking a method, getter, or setter on an object using the property descriptor of another (Tuesday, 19 January)
• [Bug 22346] Security: Check origins when invoking a method, getter, or setter on an object using the property descriptor of another (Tuesday, 19 January)
• [Bug 22346] Security: Check origins when invoking a method, getter, or setter on an object using the property descriptor of another (Tuesday, 19 January)
• [Bug 29376] Need an abstract operation for "is this an IDL-defined property" (Tuesday, 19 January)
• [Bug 22346] Security: Check origins when invoking a method, getter, or setter on an object using the property descriptor of another (Tuesday, 19 January)
• [Bug 29376] Need an abstract operation for "is this an IDL-defined property" (Tuesday, 19 January)
• [Bug 29376] Need an abstract operation for "is this an IDL-defined property" (Tuesday, 19 January)
• [Bug 22346] Security: Check origins when invoking a method, getter, or setter on an object using the property descriptor of another (Tuesday, 19 January)
• [Bug 29376] Need an abstract operation for "is this an IDL-defined property" (Tuesday, 19 January)
• [Bug 22346] Security: Check origins when invoking a method, getter, or setter on an object using the property descriptor of another (Monday, 18 January)
• [Bug 22346] Security: Check origins when invoking a method, getter, or setter on an object using the property descriptor of another (Monday, 18 January)
• [Bug 29376] Need an abstract operation for "is this an IDL-defined property" (Monday, 18 January)
• [Bug 29376] Need an abstract operation for "is this an IDL-defined property" (Monday, 18 January)
• [Bug 29376] Need an abstract operation for "is this an IDL-defined property" (Monday, 18 January)
• [Bug 29376] Need an abstract operation for "is this an IDL-defined property" (Monday, 18 January)
• [Bug 29377] Overwriting JavaScript internal methods (Monday, 18 January)
• [Bug 29377] Overwriting JavaScript internal methods (Friday, 15 January)
• [Bug 29376] Need an abstract operation for "is this an IDL-defined property" (Friday, 15 January)
• [Bug 29377] New: Overwriting JavaScript internal methods (Thursday, 14 January)
• [Bug 29376] New: Need an abstract operation for "is this an IDL-defined property" (Thursday, 14 January)
• [Bug 29372] New: Add NotAllowedError exception (Wednesday, 13 January)
• [Bug 29369] perform a security check needs to be passed a property name and type (Wednesday, 13 January)
• [Bug 29369] perform a security check needs to be passed a property name and type (Wednesday, 13 January)
• [Bug 29369] New: perform a security check needs to be passed a property name and type (Tuesday, 12 January)
• [Bug 22392] maybe define .name for Function objects corresponding to operations/attributes (Monday, 4 January)

Domenic Denicola

• RE: URLSearchParams: calling .set() and .append() should return itself (Monday, 29 February)

Jonathan Watt

• Re: [SecureContext] - throw or hide (Monday, 21 March)
• Re: [SecureContext] - throw or hide (Monday, 21 March)
• [SecureContext] - throw or hide (Friday, 18 March)

Marcos Caceres

• URLSearchParams: calling .set() and .append() should return itself (Monday, 29 February)

Martin Thomson

• Re: [SecureContext] - throw or hide (Monday, 21 March)

Olli Pettay

• Re: [SecureContext] - throw or hide (Monday, 21 March)

Richard Barnes

• Re: [SecureContext] - throw or hide (Monday, 21 March)
• Re: [SecureContext] - throw or hide (Monday, 21 March)

Tab Atkins Jr.

• Re: URLSearchParams: calling .set() and .append() should return itself (Monday, 29 February)

Travis Leithead

• RE: [SecureContext] - throw or hide (Monday, 21 March)

Last message date: Monday, 21 March 2016 21:14:27 UTC