- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2016 04:09:32 +0000
- To: public-script-coord@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=28798 --- Comment #9 from Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com> --- Ah yeah, I wasn't thinking of the third option - actually stealing ownership of the buffer. I wasn't intending that - it's unspecified right now, but FontFace *should* copy. IndexedDB, and all the messaging APIs, are doing the same. Copying is just the safest of all the options. We *could* design things such that authors could avoid the copy, by setting some flag or similar on a buffer that indicates it's a "copy-once" buffer, and loses control of its data when any API does a copy. I'm not comfortable doing that by default, tho. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
Received on Wednesday, 10 February 2016 04:09:34 UTC