- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2016 05:27:10 +0000
- To: public-script-coord@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=29376 --- Comment #6 from Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu> --- > However, I'm wondering now if perhaps Location can use the same overrides that > WindowProxy uses for this. Note that the WindowProxy overrides are not necessarily web-compatible. See https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1197958 That said, we could try the same thing for Location, sure. It just seems like a extra risk (though still less than for WindowProxy, but since we've just established that the risk for WindowProxy is "we know it breaks some sites" that's a pretty low bar). The benefit of only doing the weirdness for the IDL-defined props is that it minimizes risk: no one is defining properties with those names on Location objects, because those properties are already non-configurable on Location objects. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
Received on Tuesday, 19 January 2016 05:27:14 UTC