W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-script-coord@w3.org > January to March 2016

[Bug 29376] Need an abstract operation for "is this an IDL-defined property"

From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2016 15:02:04 +0000
To: public-script-coord@w3.org
Message-ID: <bug-29376-3890-OCOB8DqJY3@http.www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/>
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=29376

--- Comment #9 from Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu> ---
You can define toJSON and valueOf using current IDL syntax, I believe, though
if they're non-enumerable we may need an extended attribute for that.  Which we
may want anyway, really.

For @@toPrimitive we'd need some IDL syntax to have symbol-named stuff....

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Received on Tuesday, 19 January 2016 15:02:10 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:14:24 UTC