Saturday, 31 March 2007
Friday, 30 March 2007
- FW: Towards a TAG consideration of CURIEs
- [RDFa TC] GRDDL test cases WD available
- Fwd: Towards a TAG consideration of CURIEs
Wednesday, 28 March 2007
Tuesday, 27 March 2007
Monday, 26 March 2007
- [RDFa] meeting record: 2007-03-26 RDF-in-XHTML telecon
- RE: [RDFa TC] Test Cases Vocabulary
- Re: [RDFa TC] Test Cases Vocabulary
- [RDFa TC] Test Cases Vocabulary
Friday, 23 March 2007
Wednesday, 21 March 2007
- Re: Coming to consensus on the default datatype
- Re: Coming to consensus on the default datatype
- Re: Coming to consensus on the default datatype
- Re: Coming to consensus on the default datatype
- Re: Coming to consensus on the default datatype
- Re: It's that Kurt Cagle again
- Coming to consensus on the default datatype
Tuesday, 20 March 2007
- It's that Kurt Cagle again
- Re: Fwd: XHTML+RDFa markup language example implemented
- Re: Fwd: XHTML+RDFa markup language example implemented
- Fwd: CFP Journal of Web Semantics SPECIAL ISSUE ON WEB 2.0 AND THE SEMANTIC WEB
Monday, 19 March 2007
- Re: Fwd: XHTML+RDFa markup language example implemented
- Re: [RDFa] rdf:XMLLiteral (was RE: Missing issue on the list: identification of RDFa content)
- Re: [RDFa] rdf:XMLLiteral (was RE: Missing issue on the list: identification of RDFa content)
- Re: [RDFa] rdf:XMLLiteral (was RE: Missing issue on the list: identification of RDFa content)
- Re: [RDFa] rdf:XMLLiteral (was RE: Missing issue on the list: identification of RDFa content)
- Re: Possible solution to XMLLiteral issue (ISSUE-25)
- Re: Possible solution to XMLLiteral issue (ISSUE-25)
- Re: Possible solution to XMLLiteral issue (was Re: [RDFa] rdf:XMLLiteral (was RE: Missing issue on the list: identification of RDFa content))
- Re: plain and datatyped literals - DL happy with 1 property for both?
- Possible solution to XMLLiteral issue (was Re: [RDFa] rdf:XMLLiteral (was RE: Missing issue on the list: identification of RDFa content))
- Fwd: XHTML+RDFa markup language example implemented
- plain and datatyped literals - DL happy with 1 property for both?
- Re: [RDFa] rdf:XMLLiteral (was RE: Missing issue on the list: identification of RDFa content)
- Re: [RDFa] rdf:XMLLiteral (was RE: Missing issue on the list: identification of RDFa content)
- Re: [RDFa] rdf:XMLLiteral (was RE: Missing issue on the list: identification of RDFa content)
- Wiki Updated
- Re: [RDFa] rdf:XMLLiteral (was RE: Missing issue on the list: identification of RDFa content)
- XML Literal Puzzle
- XML Literal Puzzle 2
- Re: [RDFa] rdf:XMLLiteral (was RE: Missing issue on the list: identification of RDFa content)
- Re: [RDFa] rdf:XMLLiteral (was RE: Missing issue on the list: identification of RDFa content)
- RE: sick
- Re: [RDFa] rdf:XMLLiteral (was RE: Missing issue on the list: identification of RDFa content)
- Re: [RDFa] rdf:XMLLiteral (was RE: Missing issue on the list: identification of RDFa content)
- Re: [RDFa] rdf:XMLLiteral (was RE: Missing issue on the list: identification of RDFa content)
- Re: [RDFa] rdf:XMLLiteral (was RE: Missing issue on the list: identification of RDFa content)
- Re: [RDFa] rdf:XMLLiteral (was RE: Missing issue on the list: identification of RDFa content)
- Re: [RDFa] rdf:XMLLiteral (was RE: Missing issue on the list: identification of RDFa content)
- Re: [RDFa] rdf:XMLLiteral (was RE: Missing issue on the list: identification of RDFa content)
- Re: [RDFa] rdf:XMLLiteral (was RE: Missing issue on the list: identification of RDFa content)
- Re: sick
- Re: [RDFa] rdf:XMLLiteral (was RE: Missing issue on the list: identification of RDFa content)
- Re: [RDFa] rdf:XMLLiteral (was RE: Missing issue on the list: identification of RDFa content)
Sunday, 18 March 2007
- Re: sick
- Re: [RDFa] rdf:XMLLiteral (was RE: Missing issue on the list: identification of RDFa content)
- sick
Friday, 16 March 2007
- Re: [RDFa] rdf:XMLLiteral (was RE: Missing issue on the list: identification of RDFa content)
- Re: [RDFa] rdf:XMLLiteral (was RE: Missing issue on the list: identification of RDFa content)
- Re: [RDFa] rdf:XMLLiteral (was RE: Missing issue on the list: identification of RDFa content)
- Re: [RDFa] rdf:XMLLiteral (was RE: Missing issue on the list: identification of RDFa content)
- Re: [RDFa] rdf:XMLLiteral (was RE: Missing issue on the list: identification of RDFa content)
- Re: RDFa hCard Experiment
- Re: [RDFa] rdf:XMLLiteral (was RE: Missing issue on the list: identification of RDFa content)
- Re: [RDFa] rdf:XMLLiteral (was RE: Missing issue on the list: identification of RDFa content)
- RDFa hCard Experiment
- Re: [RDFa] rdf:XMLLiteral (was RE: Missing issue on the list: identification of RDFa content)
Thursday, 15 March 2007
Wednesday, 14 March 2007
Tuesday, 13 March 2007
Monday, 12 March 2007
- RDFa Primer 1.0 12 March 2007 published
- RDFa Meeting Minutes, 2007/03/12
- Re: ISSUE-29: What is the MIME type for an HTML+RDFa document?
- Fwd: ISSUE-29: What is the MIME type for an HTML+RDFa document?
- fwd: ISSUE-28: How does one \"Follow your nose\" from an HTML+RDFa document to know the author intended to assert the specified triples
Sunday, 11 March 2007
- Re: RDFa FAQ comments and activities
- Telecon Monday - 0900 Boston, *1300 UTC*
- Re: RDFa FAQ comments and activities
- RDFa FAQ comments and activities
Wednesday, 7 March 2007
Tuesday, 6 March 2007
- RE: comments on RDFa Test Cases
- comments on RDFa Test Cases
- Re: [RDFa] Proposal for test process
- [RDFa] Proposal for test process
- Re: [RDFa] Update to RDFa Scenarios, including response to Comments
- Re: [RDFa] Update to RDFa Scenarios, including response to Comments
- Re: [RDFa] Test Suite - next steps
- Re: [RDFa] Test Suite - next steps
- Re: [RDFa] Test Suite - next steps
Monday, 5 March 2007
- Re: [RDFa] Test Suite - next steps
- [RDFa] Test Suite - next steps
- [RDFa] meeting record: 2007-03-05 RDF-in-XHTML TF telecon
- Request to Vote on publication of RDFa Primer and Use Case documents
- Re: [RDFa] Response to Reviewer Comments on RDFa Primer
- Re: [RDFa] Update to RDFa Scenarios, including response to Comments
- RE: [RDFa] Telecon Monday, 1400 UTC
- RE: [RDFa] Telecon Monday, 1400 UTC
- Re: [RDFa] Update to RDFa Scenarios, including response to Comments
- Re: [RDFa] Updated Javascript Library, bookmarklets, and a public version of the RDFa Clipboard
Sunday, 4 March 2007
Saturday, 3 March 2007
- AW: misuse of "conformance testing"?
- RE: misuse of "conformance testing"?
- RE: misuse of "conformance testing"?
- Re: [RDFa] Re: Comments on the latest snapshot of the primer (2007-02-27)
Friday, 2 March 2007
- Re: [RDFa] Updated Javascript Library, bookmarklets, and a public version of the RDFa Clipboard
- Re: [RDFa] Updated Javascript Library, bookmarklets, and a public version of the RDFa Clipboard
- Re: [RDFa] Updated Javascript Library, bookmarklets, and a public version of the RDFa Clipboard
- [RDFa] Updated Javascript Library, bookmarklets, and a public version of the RDFa Clipboard
- [RDFa] Update to RDFa Scenarios, including response to Comments
- Re: [RDFa] Response to Reviewer Comments on RDFa Primer
- Re: [RDFa] Response to Reviewer Comments on RDFa Primer
- Re: [RDFa] Response to Reviewer Comments on RDFa Primer
- [RDFa] Re: Comments on the latest snapshot of the primer (2007-02-27)