- From: Ian Davis <iand@internetalchemy.org>
- Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2007 13:23:21 +0000
- To: public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org
Hi all, I'm taking another look at RDFa to see how it and eRDF can be better friends :) I'm looking specifically at the default of XMLLiteral. I've read Mark's clear explanation of the thinking behind it[1] and understand the arguments. My preference, from a usability and "principle of least surprise" point of view is for the default to be plain literals. However, I'm still working through the various pros/cons. I have a question which I couldn't find an answer to in my reading of the syntax doc[2]. How would the following triple be encoded in RDFa (given usual namespace prefix mappings): <http://example.com/doc> dc:title "RDF or Bust" . The natural place for this to fit would be on the <title> element of the HTML document, or possible on an <h1>. Ian [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/2007Feb/0003 [2] http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/RDFa/syntax/
Received on Friday, 16 March 2007 13:23:41 UTC