- From: Mark Birbeck <mark.birbeck@x-port.net>
- Date: Sun, 18 Mar 2007 16:59:42 -0700
- To: "Ben Adida" <ben@adida.net>
- Cc: RDFa <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org>
Sorry to hear this Ben. > I'm sick with a bad cold, and it doesn't look like I'm getting any > better today. I won't be able to make the meeting tomorrow. Please do > meet without me. Issues that do need addressing: > > 1) XHTML 1.1 Module: Mark, we really need this, and we've gone over the > schedule on this one many times. Let's get the current version up in a > public place ASAP, even if it's not perfect. My recent trip to the US took up a lot more time than I had anticipated, so nothing was done on this over the last 2 weeks. I intend to work on this during Monday. > 2) Ian's remarks, and IBM's comments, on the default data type. With respect to everyone's comments, I haven't yet seen anything other than stated 'preferences' about what 'feels right'. Some people have said they'll be following up with other comments, and I'd like to see those before we spend time discussing this on a telecon. I've sent some comments to the list re-outlining the rationale behind the current position, with the intention of trying to get focused answers. I'd really appreciate (a) a *logical* justification for why using plain literals is more *correct* than using rdf:XMLLiteral and (b) a justification for why it is a good idea to remove authors' intent by 'flattening' any mark-up in an XHTML document to be plain literals. Regards, Mark -- Mark Birbeck, formsPlayer mark.birbeck@x-port.net | +44 (0) 20 7689 9232 http://www.formsPlayer.com | http://internet-apps.blogspot.com standards. innovation.
Received on Sunday, 18 March 2007 23:59:45 UTC