- From: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2007 14:33:27 +0100
- To: mark.birbeck@x-port.net
- Cc: RDFa <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Mark Birbeck wrote: > > Hi Ivan > >> > If we're going to do this, perhaps we should also invent a similarly >> > short 'trigger' for XML literals? That would mean that authors don't >> > need to set up the RDF namespace which adds a lot of extra typing, and >> > more importantly a potential 'scare factor'. >> > >> >> Hm. I see what you mean, it makes sense. Having said that, if one wants >> to use other datatypes (eg, integers), one has to use the xsd: >> namespace, right? Or do we want to have a similar keyword for each of >> the xsd datatypes? It can be done, but it is a bit shaky: what happens >> if the Schema folks upgrade their datatype definitions? We loose:-( >> >> I do not really have a strong opinion on this, I must admit. > > I'm not worried about the XSD datatypes, since to an XHTML author it > would at least be clear that when they want 'a datatype' they have to > do some work. That is true. > That's not so clear with XML literals though. Since an > author already has some mark-up in their document, the author will most > likely simply be trying to say 'all of the following mark-up is > significant'. The fact that the way RDF achieves this preservation of > the significant mark-up is by flagging the literal with a datatype of > 'rdf:XMLLiteral' is ideally not something the author would need to > concern themselves with, since it's an implementation detail. Yes, I see your point. > > So my suggestion is partly about removing the need to create a > namespace, and partly about avoiding mentioning RDF when I think we > can make it so that XHTML authors don't really need to be aware of it. > In which case my previous proposal saying datatype="" for plain is probably not right didactically. In other words, two keywords are needed for that purpose. I let the choice be done by you anglo-saxons, my hungaro-french dialect may not be good enough for that:-) Cheers I. > Regards, > > Mark > - -- Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead URL: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ PGP Key: http://www.cwi.nl/%7Eivan/AboutMe/pgpkey.html FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.1 (Cygwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFGATQndR3hQzQ/Gj0RAiYaAKCm2Ikd5TRJs03YhjiwZg65fMiOwQCfQwiP vo4m7cZTSTeFy69tk8WqIWE= =3xC6 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Wednesday, 21 March 2007 13:33:35 UTC