- From: Elias Torres <elias@torrez.us>
- Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2007 11:58:42 -0400
- To: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- CC: mark.birbeck@x-port.net, public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org
Dan Connolly wrote:
> On Mon, 2007-03-19 at 10:53 -0400, Elias Torres wrote:
>> [...] On our RDFa TF call, we discussed with Mark
>> the XMLLiteral issue
>
> Is that issue 25?
> http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/track/issues/25
Yes.
>
> It would be nice to have some convention for subject
> lines that are relevant to issues... though I
> prefer content-bearing words ("XMLLiteral issue")
> to issue numbers.
Right.
>
> I encourage the use of both some content-bearing
> words and the issue number.
I didn't even know the feature existed.
>
> Oh... the tracker docs say
> If you're mentioning a particular issue simply use the issue
> identifier, such as ´ISSUE-123¡. The word ISSUE must be in uppercase.
> -- http://www.w3.org/2005/06/tracker/email
I'll do from now on.
>
> though I think the SWD tracker is only watching
> the public-swd-wg list, not this one. Oh well.
>
I guess somebody should fix that.
Thanks
-Elias
Received on Monday, 19 March 2007 15:58:50 UTC