- From: Elias Torres <elias@torrez.us>
- Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2007 11:58:42 -0400
- To: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- CC: mark.birbeck@x-port.net, public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org
Dan Connolly wrote: > On Mon, 2007-03-19 at 10:53 -0400, Elias Torres wrote: >> [...] On our RDFa TF call, we discussed with Mark >> the XMLLiteral issue > > Is that issue 25? > http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/track/issues/25 Yes. > > It would be nice to have some convention for subject > lines that are relevant to issues... though I > prefer content-bearing words ("XMLLiteral issue") > to issue numbers. Right. > > I encourage the use of both some content-bearing > words and the issue number. I didn't even know the feature existed. > > Oh... the tracker docs say > If you're mentioning a particular issue simply use the issue > identifier, such as ´ISSUE-123¡. The word ISSUE must be in uppercase. > -- http://www.w3.org/2005/06/tracker/email I'll do from now on. > > though I think the SWD tracker is only watching > the public-swd-wg list, not this one. Oh well. > I guess somebody should fix that. Thanks -Elias
Received on Monday, 19 March 2007 15:58:50 UTC