- From: Ian Davis <iand@internetalchemy.org>
- Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2007 21:09:58 +0000
- To: mark.birbeck@x-port.net
- CC: public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org
On 19/03/2007 20:50, Mark Birbeck wrote: > But more importantly, there is no social aspect to this issue. RDF > defines both plain literals and typed literals, and it defines how > literals are compared for equality. There's not much more to it than > that, and to suggest that we should look at whether typed literals are > more common than plain literals is just strange. It's like asking > which numbers are more common. Should everyone who is 6 ft tall choose > to be either 5 ft or 7ft, since those numbers are more common than 6? > It's a non-argument, because we're not dealing with specific numbers, > but a numbering _system_, and RDF is exactly the same--it's an entire > system that you cannot cherry-pick. OK, you've convinced me that it's not worth pursuing this. Good luck with RDFa. Ian
Received on Monday, 19 March 2007 21:10:09 UTC