- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2007 10:51:07 -0500
- To: Elias Torres <elias@torrez.us>
- Cc: mark.birbeck@x-port.net, public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org
On Mon, 2007-03-19 at 10:53 -0400, Elias Torres wrote: > [...] On our RDFa TF call, we discussed with Mark > the XMLLiteral issue Is that issue 25? http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/track/issues/25 It would be nice to have some convention for subject lines that are relevant to issues... though I prefer content-bearing words ("XMLLiteral issue") to issue numbers. I encourage the use of both some content-bearing words and the issue number. Oh... the tracker docs say If you're mentioning a particular issue simply use the issue identifier, such as ´ISSUE-123¡. The word ISSUE must be in uppercase. -- http://www.w3.org/2005/06/tracker/email though I think the SWD tracker is only watching the public-swd-wg list, not this one. Oh well. -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541 0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Monday, 19 March 2007 15:51:43 UTC