- From: Ben Adida <ben@adida.net>
- Date: Mon, 05 Mar 2007 14:15:05 -0500
- To: public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org
- CC: SWD WG <public-swd-wg@w3.org>, Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
In response to Ivan's comments: > - AFAIK, we agreed in Cambridge that we would *not* include RDFa code to > the document. However, Use Case #2 still includes the > property="dc:creator" in the code; it should probably be deleted Yes, that's a bug. Removed in the latest version [1]. > Actually I wonder whether, for the final document, it is not worth > having all those examples marked up with RDFa, store them somewhere, and > link to those from this document. For learning RDFa that might be useful > (I presume you have those somewhere, so it would not be a big deal to > have them). The comments we received were to *not* include any exact RDFa in this document, lest we choose to change the syntax in the future. Working these use cases into our test cases, however, is definitely our plan. > - For Use Case #8, I realized the other day that the Turtle syntax for > lists[1] is *without* commas! (Maybe parsers accept the code with > commas, I must admit I do not know, but the official version for the > time being is[1] which does not use them). Should be ammended in the text... And not only that, apparently there's no "." at the end of statements inside square brackets! I've corrected both. -Ben [1] http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/RDFa/scenarios/20070305/
Received on Monday, 5 March 2007 19:15:30 UTC