Converting SPARQL syntax to trees
non-TR links in SPARQL protocol doc
regrets
DISTINCTness of literals
ISSUE: domain of solutions
ISSUE: duplicates from UNION
ISSUE: entailment and general framework
ISSUE: rule [14] SolutionModifier
rq24 ready for publication
Fw: A question about the OPTIONAL pattern
test cases for FILTER scope and order, take 2
12 sept minutes
agenda, 19 Sept, 14:30 UTC
test cases for FILTER scope and order
more on earl
earl
claimed completion of DATATYPE action
Re: Comments on rq24 reorganization
[EDITORIAL] Preface of rq24
[NEW ISSUE?] NAF & !BOUND
- Re: [NEW ISSUE?] NAF & !BOUND
- Re: [NEW ISSUE?] NAF & !BOUND
- Re: [NEW ISSUE?] NAF & !BOUND issues#unsaid, nestedOptional
agenda, 12 Sept, 14:30 UTC
CSS problems with rq24
proposed text to address unbound variables in FILTERs
minutes Sep 5
Complexity of nested optionals
[TO ADVANCE] formsOfDistinct
[TO SETTLE] nonliteralValueTesting
[NEW ISSUE] Indicating D-entailment
[TO SETTLE] contradictoryKB
Fw: Comments on rq24 reorganization
agenda, 5 sept 14:30 UTC
RDF Data Access 29 Aug minutes for review
ISSUE: BNode scope through UNION (and other algebraic operations)
agenda, 29 August, 14:30 UTC
22 August minutes
order of FILTERs in a BGP? scope of FILTERs?
regrets 29 Aug
agenda, late
SPARQL Tutorial
Fwd: ACTION item(s): definition(s) and an algorithm for postprocessing minimization
Open world value tests
Some datatype() and lang() tests
trade-offs for equivalence tests
agenda, 22 August 2006, 14:30 UTC
Zakim difficulties, 21 Aug
[Fwd: Re: Determining whether '<' is a beginning of IRI or 'less than' operator [OK?]]
- Re: [Fwd: Re: Determining whether '<' is a beginning of IRI or 'less than' operator [OK?]]
- Re: [Fwd: Re: Determining whether '<' is a beginning of IRI or 'less than' operator [OK?]]
Bnodes and the RDF graph syntax (part 1).
ACTION item(s): definition(s) and an algorithm for postprocessing minimization
Constructive mapping semantics for SPARQL
Editorial: consistent use of "triple" instead of "arc"
ISSUE: Malformed literals and non-lexical literals
- Re: ISSUE: Malformed literals and non-lexical literals
ISSUE: Inconsistent graphs (and illformed literals)
Summary of BNode redundancy options (at the moment)
- Re: Summary of BNode redundancy options (at the moment)
Meeting minutes 15 August 2006
Review of "rq24" reorg. of SPARQL Query Language for RDF (part 3)
Review of "rq24" reorg. of SPARQL Query Language for RDF (part 2)
Review of "rq24" reorg. of SPARQL Query Language for RDF (part 1)
- Re: Review of "rq24" reorg. of SPARQL Query Language for RDF (part 1)
- Re: Review of "rq24" reorg. of SPARQL Query Language for RDF (part 1)
telcon agenda, 15 August 14:30 UTC
Weird value testing situations
ISSUE: DISTINCT is underspecified
- Re: ISSUE: DISTINCT is underspecified
- Re: ISSUE: DISTINCT is underspecified
- Re: ISSUE: DISTINCT is underspecified
What is "the serious bug in entailment semantics" found by J. Perez"?
- Re: What is "the serious bug in entailment semantics" found by J. Perez"?
- Re: What is "the serious bug in entailment semantics" found by J. Perez"?
- Re: What is "the serious bug in entailment semantics" found by J. Perez"?
- Re: What is "the serious bug in entailment semantics" found by J. Perez"?
- Semantics necessary not sufficient (was: Re: What is "the serious bug in entailment semantics" found by J. Perez"?)
- Re: Semantics necessary not sufficient (was: Re: What is "the serious bug in entailment semantics" found by J. Perez"?)
- Re: Semantics necessary not sufficient (was: Re: What is "the serious bug in entailment semantics" found by J. Perez"?)
- Semantics necessary not sufficient (was: Re: What is "the serious bug in entailment semantics" found by J. Perez"?)
- Re: What is "the serious bug in entailment semantics" found by J. Perez"?
agenda, 8 August 2006, 14:30 UTC
- Re: agenda, 8 August 2006, 14:30 UTC
- Re: agenda, 8 August 2006, 14:30 UTC
- Re: agenda, 8 August 2006, 14:30 UTC
- Re: agenda, 8 August 2006, 14:30 UTC
- Meeting minutes 8 August 2006
A neat, but impractical, solution
Meeting Minutes Aug 01
[Fwd: { } and OPTIONAL]
Summary of my comments: close many, please add some to issue list
bnodes as answer bindings
- Re: bnodes as answer bindings
my action item
ready to exit CR?
agenda, 1 August 2006, 14:30UTC
agenda delayed
Reposting my paper on constructive formal semantics
A constructive formal semantics for SPARQL
reminder: next DAWG telcon Tue, 1 Aug
Re: Comments on 9 "Specifying RDF datasets" (CR 6 Apr 2006)
Re: Comments on 2.6 "Multiple Matches" (CR 6 Apr 2006)
Re: Comments on 10.1 "Solution sequences and result forms" (CR 6 Apr 2006)
Re: Comments on 2.1.4 "Syntax for blank nodes" in 6 April 2006 CR
approved DAWG test: extendedType-ne-fail
Re: Comment on 11.2 "filter evaluation" (CR 6 Apr 2006)
Concrete vs. existential semantics
rq23 -> rq24
Re: GRAPH details and test cases
Re: Blank node identifiers in FILTER clauses
- Re: Blank node identifiers in FILTER clauses
- Re: Blank node identifiers in FILTER clauses
- Re: Blank node identifiers in FILTER clauses
- Re: Blank node identifiers in FILTER clauses