public-rdf-dawg@w3.org from July to September 2006 by author

Bijan Parsia

• Re: DISTINCTness of literals (Monday, 25 September)
• Re: rq24 ready for publication (Thursday, 21 September)
• Re: rq24 ready for publication (Thursday, 21 September)
• Re: rq24 ready for publication (Thursday, 21 September)
• Re: rq24 ready for publication (Thursday, 21 September)
• Re: [EDITORIAL] Preface of rq24 (Tuesday, 19 September)
• Re: [EDITORIAL] Preface of rq24 (Tuesday, 19 September)
• Re: [NEW ISSUE?] NAF & !BOUND (Wednesday, 13 September)
• Re: agenda, 12 Sept, 14:30 UTC (Tuesday, 12 September)
• Re: [NEW ISSUE?] NAF & !BOUND (Tuesday, 12 September)
• Re: Summary of my comments: close many, please add some to issue list (Tuesday, 12 September)
• [EDITORIAL] Preface of rq24 (Tuesday, 12 September)
• [NEW ISSUE?] NAF & !BOUND (Tuesday, 12 September)
• Re: Review of "rq24" reorg. of SPARQL Query Language for RDF (part 1) (Tuesday, 12 September)
• Re: Complexity of nested optionals (Monday, 11 September)
• Re: [TO ADVANCE] formsOfDistinct (Wednesday, 6 September)
• Re: Complexity of nested optionals (Wednesday, 6 September)
• Complexity of nested optionals (Wednesday, 6 September)
• [TO ADVANCE] formsOfDistinct (Wednesday, 6 September)
• [TO SETTLE] nonliteralValueTesting (Wednesday, 6 September)
• [NEW ISSUE] Indicating D-entailment (Wednesday, 6 September)
• [TO SETTLE] contradictoryKB (Wednesday, 6 September)
• ISSUE: BNode scope through UNION (and other algebraic operations) (Tuesday, 29 August)
• SPARQL Tutorial (Monday, 28 August)
• Fwd: ACTION item(s): definition(s) and an algorithm for postprocessing minimization (Friday, 25 August)
• Re: Bnodes and the RDF graph syntax (part 1). (Tuesday, 22 August)
• Re: ACTION item(s): definition(s) and an algorithm for postprocessing minimization (Monday, 21 August)
• ACTION item(s): definition(s) and an algorithm for postprocessing minimization (Saturday, 19 August)
• Re: One semi-historical point (was Re: ISSUE: DISTINCT is underspecified) (Saturday, 19 August)
• Re: ISSUE: DISTINCT is underspecified (Saturday, 19 August)
• Re: Summary of BNode redundancy options (at the moment) (Friday, 18 August)
• The SameAs bit (was Re: Summary of BNode redundancy options (at the moment)) (Friday, 18 August)
• Re: ISSUE: Inconsistent graphs (and illformed literals) (Friday, 18 August)
• Editorial: consistent use of "triple" instead of "arc" (Friday, 18 August)
• Re: ISSUE: Inconsistent graphs (and illformed literals) (Friday, 18 August)
• The Mary example (Re: Summary of BNode redundancy options (at the moment)) (Thursday, 17 August)
• Re: ISSUE: Malformed literals and non-lexical literals (Thursday, 17 August)
• Re: Summary of BNode redundancy options (at the moment) (Thursday, 17 August)
• Re: ISSUE: Malformed literals and non-lexical literals (Thursday, 17 August)
• One semi-historical point (was Re: ISSUE: DISTINCT is underspecified) (Thursday, 17 August)
• Re: ISSUE: Malformed literals and non-lexical literals (Thursday, 17 August)
• Re: Summary of BNode redundancy options (at the moment) (Thursday, 17 August)
• ISSUE: Malformed literals and non-lexical literals (Wednesday, 16 August)
• ISSUE: Inconsistent graphs (and illformed literals) (Wednesday, 16 August)
• Summary of BNode redundancy options (at the moment) (Wednesday, 16 August)
• Re: ISSUE: DISTINCT is underspecified (Wednesday, 16 August)
• Re: ISSUE: DISTINCT is underspecified (Monday, 14 August)
• Re: Weird value testing situations (Monday, 14 August)
• Re: ISSUE: DISTINCT is underspecified (Monday, 14 August)
• Weird value testing situations (Monday, 14 August)
• Re: Semantics necessary not sufficient (was: Re: What is "the serious bug in entailment semantics" found by J. Perez"?) (Monday, 14 August)
• ISSUE: DISTINCT is underspecified (Saturday, 12 August)
• Re: Semantics necessary not sufficient (was: Re: What is "the serious bug in entailment semantics" found by J. Perez"?) (Friday, 11 August)
• Re: A neat, but impractical, solution (Monday, 7 August)
• Re: bnodes as answer bindings (Monday, 7 August)
• Re: bnodes as answer bindings (Monday, 7 August)
• Re: bnodes as answer bindings (Monday, 7 August)
• Re: bnodes as answer bindings (Monday, 7 August)
• Re: A neat, but impractical, solution (Monday, 7 August)
• A neat, but impractical, solution (Saturday, 5 August)
• Re: bnodes as answer bindings (Friday, 4 August)
• Re: bnodes as answer bindings (Thursday, 3 August)
• Re: Blank node identifiers in FILTER clauses (Monday, 24 July)
• Re: Blank node identifiers in FILTER clauses (Monday, 17 July)
• Re: Blank node identifiers in FILTER clauses (Sunday, 2 July)

Dan Connolly

• Re: [NEW ISSUE?] NAF & !BOUND issues#unsaid, nestedOptional (Tuesday, 12 September)
• RDF Data Access 29 Aug minutes for review (Tuesday, 29 August)
• reminder: next DAWG telcon Tue, 1 Aug (Tuesday, 25 July)

Elias Torres

• Re: agenda, 22 August 2006, 14:30 UTC (Tuesday, 22 August)
• Re: agenda, 8 August 2006, 14:30 UTC (Monday, 7 August)
• Meeting Minutes Aug 01 (Friday, 4 August)

Enrico Franconi

• Re: Semantics necessary not sufficient (was: Re: What is "the serious bug in entailment semantics" found by J. Perez"?) (Friday, 11 August)
• Re: What is "the serious bug in entailment semantics" found by J. Perez"? (Thursday, 10 August)
• Re: What is "the serious bug in entailment semantics" found by J. Perez"? (Tuesday, 8 August)
• Re: What is "the serious bug in entailment semantics" found by J. Perez"? (Tuesday, 8 August)
• Re: bnodes as answer bindings (Friday, 4 August)
• Re: bnodes as answer bindings (Friday, 4 August)
• Re: agenda delayed (Monday, 31 July)
• Re: Blank node identifiers in FILTER clauses (ooooops 3) (Monday, 17 July)
• Re: Blank node identifiers in FILTER clauses (Monday, 17 July)
• Re: Blank node identifiers in FILTER clauses (ooooops 2) (Monday, 17 July)
• Re: Blank node identifiers in FILTER clauses (oops) (Monday, 17 July)
• Re: Blank node identifiers in FILTER clauses (Monday, 17 July)
• Re: Blank node identifiers in FILTER clauses (Friday, 14 July)
• Re: Blank node identifiers in FILTER clauses (Friday, 14 July)
• Re: Concrete vs. existential semantics (Thursday, 6 July)

Eric Prud'hommeaux

• Re: earl (Thursday, 28 September)
• Re: DISTINCTness of literals (Monday, 25 September)
• Re: rq24 ready for publication (Thursday, 21 September)
• rq24 ready for publication (Thursday, 21 September)
• illustrate basic graph matching conflicts (Tuesday, 19 September)
• Re: [EDITORIAL] Preface of rq24 (Tuesday, 19 September)
• Re: [EDITORIAL] Preface of rq24 (Tuesday, 19 September)
• Re: agenda, 19 Sept, 14:30 UTC (Monday, 18 September)
• Re: earl (Monday, 18 September)
• claimed completion of DATATYPE action (Thursday, 14 September)
• proposed text to address unbound variables in FILTERs (Friday, 8 September)
• regrets 29 Aug (Monday, 28 August)
• Re: adding dawg:monotonicity and extensible data types to SPARQL query (Tuesday, 22 August)
• trade-offs for equivalence tests (Tuesday, 22 August)
• Re: [Fwd: Re: Determining whether '<' is a beginning of IRI or 'less than' operator [OK?]] (Tuesday, 22 August)
• Re: adding dawg:monotonicity and extensible data types to SPARQL query (Monday, 21 August)
• Re: Meeting minutes 8 August 2006 (Tuesday, 15 August)
• adding dawg:monotonicity and extensible data types to SPARQL query (Tuesday, 15 August)
• Re: Meeting minutes 8 August 2006 (Monday, 14 August)
• Meeting minutes 8 August 2006 (Monday, 14 August)
• Re: Weird value testing situations (Monday, 14 August)
• Re: my action item (Tuesday, 8 August)
• Re: my action item (Monday, 7 August)
• Re: my action item (Thursday, 3 August)
• Re: Blank node identifiers in FILTER clauses (Monday, 24 July)
• Re: Blank node identifiers in FILTER clauses (Sunday, 16 July)
• Re: Blank node identifiers in FILTER clauses (Friday, 14 July)
• Re: Blank node identifiers in FILTER clauses (Thursday, 13 July)
• Re: Blank node identifiers in FILTER clauses (Sunday, 2 July)
• Re: Blank node identifiers in FILTER clauses (Sunday, 2 July)

Fred Zemke

• Converting SPARQL syntax to trees (Thursday, 28 September)
• ISSUE: domain of solutions (Friday, 22 September)
• ISSUE: duplicates from UNION (Friday, 22 September)
• ISSUE: entailment and general framework (Friday, 22 September)
• ISSUE: rule [14] SolutionModifier (Friday, 22 September)
• Re: order of FILTERs in a BGP? scope of FILTERs? (Wednesday, 20 September)
• Re: agenda, 12 Sept, 14:30 UTC - possible regrets (Monday, 11 September)
• Re: Constructive mapping semantics for SPARQL (Tuesday, 22 August)
• Re: agenda, 22 August 2006, 14:30 UTC (Monday, 21 August)
• Re: Constructive mapping semantics for SPARQL (Monday, 21 August)
• Constructive mapping semantics for SPARQL (Friday, 18 August)
• What is "the serious bug in entailment semantics" found by J. Perez"? (Monday, 7 August)
• Summary of my comments: close many, please add some to issue list (Wednesday, 2 August)
• ready to exit CR? (Monday, 31 July)
• Reposting my paper on constructive formal semantics (Friday, 28 July)
• A constructive formal semantics for SPARQL (Friday, 28 July)
• Concrete vs. existential semantics (Thursday, 6 July)

Jeen Broekstra

• Re: agenda, 22 August 2006, 14:30 UTC (Tuesday, 22 August)
• Meeting minutes 15 August 2006 (Wednesday, 16 August)
• Re: agenda, 8 August 2006, 14:30 UTC (Monday, 7 August)
• Re: agenda, 1 August 2006, 14:30UTC (Tuesday, 1 August)

Josh Friel

• Zakim difficulties, 21 Aug (Monday, 21 August)

Kendall Clark

• Re: earl (Thursday, 28 September)
• Re: regrets (Monday, 25 September)
• Re: rq24 ready for publication (Thursday, 21 September)
• Re: rq24 ready for publication (Thursday, 21 September)
• Re: [EDITORIAL] Preface of rq24 (Tuesday, 19 September)
• 12 sept minutes (Monday, 18 September)
• agenda, 19 Sept, 14:30 UTC (Sunday, 17 September)
• Re: [EDITORIAL] Preface of rq24 (Sunday, 17 September)
• more on earl (Friday, 15 September)
• earl (Thursday, 14 September)
• Re: Summary of my comments: close many, please add some to issue list (Tuesday, 12 September)
• agenda, 12 Sept, 14:30 UTC (Monday, 11 September)
• agenda, 5 sept 14:30 UTC (Monday, 4 September)
• agenda, 29 August, 14:30 UTC (Monday, 28 August)
• 22 August minutes (Monday, 28 August)
• agenda, late (Monday, 28 August)
• Re: GRAPH details and test cases (Tuesday, 22 August)
• agenda, 22 August 2006, 14:30 UTC (Monday, 21 August)
• telcon agenda, 15 August 14:30 UTC (Monday, 14 August)
• agenda, 8 August 2006, 14:30 UTC (Monday, 7 August)
• Re: bnodes as answer bindings (Friday, 4 August)
• agenda, 1 August 2006, 14:30UTC (Monday, 31 July)
• agenda delayed (Monday, 31 July)
• Re: GRAPH details and test cases (Tuesday, 4 July)

Lee Feigenbaum

• non-TR links in SPARQL protocol doc (Wednesday, 27 September)
• Re: regrets (Monday, 25 September)
• regrets (Monday, 25 September)
• Fw: A question about the OPTIONAL pattern (Thursday, 21 September)
• test cases for FILTER scope and order, take 2 (Monday, 18 September)
• Re: test cases for FILTER scope and order (Monday, 18 September)
• test cases for FILTER scope and order (Saturday, 16 September)
• Re: order of FILTERs in a BGP? scope of FILTERs? (Wednesday, 13 September)
• minutes Sep 5 (Wednesday, 6 September)
• regrets for 12 Sep Re: agenda, 5 sept 14:30 UTC (Tuesday, 5 September)
• Fw: Comments on rq24 reorganization (Tuesday, 5 September)
• Re: agenda, 5 sept 14:30 UTC (Tuesday, 5 September)
• order of FILTERs in a BGP? scope of FILTERs? (Monday, 28 August)
• Re: GRAPH details and test cases (Wednesday, 16 August)
• Review of "rq24" reorg. of SPARQL Query Language for RDF (part 3) (Tuesday, 15 August)
• Review of "rq24" reorg. of SPARQL Query Language for RDF (part 2) (Tuesday, 15 August)
• Review of "rq24" reorg. of SPARQL Query Language for RDF (part 1) (Tuesday, 15 August)
• Re: agenda, 8 August 2006, 14:30 UTC (Monday, 7 August)
• approved DAWG test: extendedType-ne-fail (Wednesday, 19 July)

Libby Miller

• Re: agenda, 29 August, 14:30 UTC (Tuesday, 29 August)
• Re: telcon agenda, 15 August 14:30 UTC (Tuesday, 15 August)
• Re: agenda, 8 August 2006, 14:30 UTC (Monday, 7 August)
• Re: agenda, 1 August 2006, 14:30UTC (Tuesday, 1 August)

Pat Hayes

• Re: [NEW ISSUE?] NAF & !BOUND (Tuesday, 12 September)
• Re: ACTION item(s): definition(s) and an algorithm for postprocessing minimization (Thursday, 24 August)
• Bnodes and the RDF graph syntax (part 1). (Sunday, 20 August)
• Re: Semantics necessary not sufficient (was: Re: What is "the serious bug in entailment semantics" found by J. Perez"?) (Sunday, 20 August)
• Re: ISSUE: Inconsistent graphs (and illformed literals) (Saturday, 19 August)
• Re: The Mary example (Re: Summary of BNode redundancy options (at the moment)) (Saturday, 19 August)
• Re: One semi-historical point (was Re: ISSUE: DISTINCT is underspecified) (Saturday, 19 August)
• Re: ISSUE: Malformed literals and non-lexical literals (Saturday, 19 August)
• Re: Summary of BNode redundancy options (at the moment) (Thursday, 17 August)
• Re: ISSUE: Malformed literals and non-lexical literals (Thursday, 17 August)
• Re: ISSUE: DISTINCT is underspecified (Thursday, 17 August)
• Re: ISSUE: Inconsistent graphs (and illformed literals) (Thursday, 17 August)
• Re: Summary of BNode redundancy options (at the moment) (Thursday, 17 August)
• Re: ISSUE: DISTINCT is underspecified (Wednesday, 16 August)
• Re: Semantics necessary not sufficient (was: Re: What is "the serious bug in entailment semantics" found by J. Perez"?) (Sunday, 13 August)
• Semantics necessary not sufficient (was: Re: What is "the serious bug in entailment semantics" found by J. Perez"?) (Friday, 11 August)
• Re: What is "the serious bug in entailment semantics" found by J. Perez"? (Thursday, 10 August)
• Re: bnodes as answer bindings (Tuesday, 8 August)
• Re: bnodes as answer bindings (Monday, 7 August)
• Re: bnodes as answer bindings (Monday, 7 August)
• Re: A neat, but impractical, solution (Monday, 7 August)
• Re: A neat, but impractical, solution (Monday, 7 August)
• Re: bnodes as answer bindings (Monday, 7 August)
• Re: my action item (Friday, 4 August)
• Re: bnodes as answer bindings (Friday, 4 August)
• Re: my action item (Thursday, 3 August)
• bnodes as answer bindings (Tuesday, 1 August)
• my action item (Tuesday, 1 August)
• Re: Concrete vs. existential semantics (Thursday, 6 July)
• Re: Blank node identifiers in FILTER clauses (Wednesday, 5 July)

Ralph R. Swick

• Re: [EDITORIAL] Preface of rq24 (Tuesday, 19 September)

Seaborne, Andy

• Re: Converting SPARQL syntax to trees (Friday, 29 September)
• Re: ISSUE: rule [14] SolutionModifier (Monday, 25 September)
• DISTINCTness of literals (Monday, 25 September)
• Re: rq24 ready for publication (Thursday, 21 September)
• Re: rq24 ready for publication (Thursday, 21 September)
• Re: test cases for FILTER scope and order (Monday, 18 September)
• Re: more on earl (Monday, 18 September)
• Re: order of FILTERs in a BGP? scope of FILTERs? (Thursday, 14 September)
• Re: order of FILTERs in a BGP? scope of FILTERs? (Friday, 15 September)
• Re: Comments on rq24 reorganization (Wednesday, 13 September)
• Re: agenda, 12 Sept, 14:30 UTC (Tuesday, 12 September)
• Re: agenda, 12 Sept, 14:30 UTC (Tuesday, 12 September)
• Re: Review of "rq24" reorg. of SPARQL Query Language for RDF (part 2) (Tuesday, 12 September)
• Re: Review of "rq24" reorg. of SPARQL Query Language for RDF (part 3) (Tuesday, 12 September)
• Re: Review of "rq24" reorg. of SPARQL Query Language for RDF (part 1) (Monday, 11 September)
• CSS problems with rq24 (Monday, 11 September)
• Re: order of FILTERs in a BGP? scope of FILTERs? (Thursday, 7 September)
• Open world value tests (Thursday, 24 August)
• Re: trade-offs for equivalence tests (Tuesday, 22 August)
• Re: adding dawg:monotonicity and extensible data types to SPARQL query (Tuesday, 22 August)
• Some datatype() and lang() tests (Tuesday, 22 August)
• Re: adding dawg:monotonicity and extensible data types to SPARQL query (Tuesday, 22 August)
• Re: [Fwd: Re: Determining whether '<' is a beginning of IRI or 'less than' operator [OK?]] (Monday, 21 August)
• [Fwd: Re: Determining whether '<' is a beginning of IRI or 'less than' operator [OK?]] (Monday, 21 August)
• Re: Constructive mapping semantics for SPARQL (Monday, 21 August)
• Re: adding dawg:monotonicity and extensible data types to SPARQL query (Monday, 21 August)
• Re: ACTION item(s): definition(s) and an algorithm for postprocessing minimization (Monday, 21 August)
• Re: ISSUE: Malformed literals and non-lexical literals (Thursday, 17 August)
• Re: ISSUE: Malformed literals and non-lexical literals (Thursday, 17 August)
• Re: GRAPH details and test cases (Thursday, 17 August)
• Re: ISSUE: Malformed literals and non-lexical literals (Thursday, 17 August)
• Re: Meeting minutes 8 August 2006 (Tuesday, 15 August)
• Re: Review of "rq24" reorg. of SPARQL Query Language for RDF (part 1) (Tuesday, 15 August)
• Re: ISSUE: DISTINCT is underspecified (Monday, 14 August)
• Re: Meeting minutes 8 August 2006 (Monday, 14 August)
• Re: ISSUE: DISTINCT is underspecified (Monday, 14 August)
• Re: my action item (Wednesday, 9 August)
• Re: What is "the serious bug in entailment semantics" found by J. Perez"? (Tuesday, 8 August)
• Re: my action item (Monday, 7 August)
• [Fwd: { } and OPTIONAL] (Friday, 4 August)
• Re: my action item (Friday, 4 August)
• Re: ready to exit CR? (Tuesday, 1 August)
• Re: agenda, 1 August 2006, 14:30UTC (Monday, 31 July)
• Re: agenda delayed (Monday, 31 July)
• Re: Reposting my paper on constructive formal semantics (Monday, 31 July)
• Re: Comments on 9 "Specifying RDF datasets" (CR 6 Apr 2006) (Monday, 24 July)
• Re: Comments on 2.6 "Multiple Matches" (CR 6 Apr 2006) (Monday, 24 July)
• Re: Comments on 10.1 "Solution sequences and result forms" (CR 6 Apr 2006) (Monday, 24 July)
• Re: Comments on 2.1.4 "Syntax for blank nodes" in 6 April 2006 CR (Monday, 24 July)
• Re: approved DAWG test: extendedType-ne-fail (Wednesday, 19 July)
• Re: Comment on 11.2 "filter evaluation" (CR 6 Apr 2006) (Wednesday, 12 July)
• Re: Concrete vs. existential semantics (Monday, 10 July)
• rq23 -> rq24 (Wednesday, 5 July)
• Re: Blank node identifiers in FILTER clauses (Wednesday, 5 July)

Steve Harris

• Re: Complexity of nested optionals (Monday, 11 September)
• Re: agenda, late (Tuesday, 29 August)
• Re: ACTION item(s): definition(s) and an algorithm for postprocessing minimization (Friday, 25 August)
• Re: GRAPH details and test cases (Tuesday, 22 August)
• Re: agenda, 22 August 2006, 14:30 UTC (Tuesday, 22 August)
• Re: GRAPH details and test cases (Thursday, 17 August)
• Re: Meeting minutes 8 August 2006 (Monday, 14 August)
• Re: agenda delayed (Monday, 31 July)
• Re: Blank node identifiers in FILTER clauses (Sunday, 2 July)

Last message date: Friday, 29 September 2006 13:25:53 UTC