Re: Blank node identifiers in FILTER clauses

On 2 Jul 2006, at 11:39, Eric Prud'hommeaux wrote:
> I am betting (significant amounts of my time) that the parallelism
> (and cut-and-paste-ism) with a popularly deployed assertion language
> is worth the extra bit parser effort (keeping an association list of
> bNode symbol to bNode). It is possible, however, that I am missing
> some of Jeen's pain because I didn't fully implement something or
> because he is working in a different context than I imagine.

The scope is somewhat annoying to deal with. Depending on what the  
current position on scope is, I lost track.

- Steve

Received on Sunday, 2 July 2006 11:20:08 UTC