- From: Pat Hayes <phayes@ihmc.us>
- Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2006 11:30:14 -0500
- To: "Seaborne, Andy" <andy.seaborne@hp.com>
- Cc: Fred Zemke <fred.zemke@oracle.com>, public-rdf-dawg@w3.org
>> >>I see four possible resolutions: >> >>1. (My preference) the scope of a blank node identifier is >>an entire FilteredBasicGraphPattern, not just a basic graph >>pattern. To do this, we need to extend the definitions in >>section 2.5 so that they define the solutions of a >>FilteredBasicGraphPattern rather than just the solutions of a >>basic graph pattern. I can see how to do this with the >>simple entailment mapping definition; I don't see how to do >>this with the general E-entailment definition. > >My preference as well. > >I would remove the possibility of blank nodes (and general expressions) in the >functions isIRI/isLiteral/isBlank, restricting them to named variables only, >because these really work on the terms of the bindings, not the values. > >I would like to see a proposal for (1) from one or more of the original >contributors of the current text (Enrico, Bijan, Pat). I will try to get to this in about a week, if nobody else beats me to it. I havnt got time before then to focus down to the details closely enough. Pat -- --------------------------------------------------------------------- IHMC (850)434 8903 or (650)494 3973 home 40 South Alcaniz St. (850)202 4416 office Pensacola (850)202 4440 fax FL 32502 (850)291 0667 cell phayesAT-SIGNihmc.us http://www.ihmc.us/users/phayes
Received on Wednesday, 5 July 2006 16:30:35 UTC