public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org from August 2005 by date

Tuesday, 30 August 2005

Comments on SPARQL: Querying the Dataset Jagannathan Srinivasan
Re: GROUP BY [ok?] Richard Newman
Re: GROUP BY [ok?] Bruce D'Arcus
Re: GROUP BY [ok?] Dan Connolly
[OK?] Re: Typo in RDF Dataset definition Seaborne, Andy

Monday, 29 August 2005

Re: Query forms should be resources, not operations Kendall Clark
Re: SPARQL Protocol: inconsistent parameter names Kendall Clark
Re: General Document Comments Dan Connolly
Re: SPARQL variable names syntax Dan Connolly
SPARQL Protocol: inconsistent parameter names Arjohn Kampman
[CLOSED] Re: [OK?] Re: Editorial comment on SPARQL Query Language Last Call Ivan Herman
[OK?] Re: Editorial comment on SPARQL Query Language Last Call Eric Prud'hommeaux

Friday, 26 August 2005

Typo in RDF Dataset definition Jeroen van der Ham

Monday, 22 August 2005

Re: Please make sure the grammar is directly machine consumable. Yosi Scharf
RE: Please make sure the grammar is directly machine consumable. Seaborne, Andy
Re: Please make sure the grammar is directly machine consumable. Yosi Scharf
Re: Please make sure the grammar is directly machine consumable. stan.devitt@agfa.com
SPARQL: Another dditorial comment on SPARQL Last Call WD Ivan Herman

Sunday, 21 August 2005

Re: Please make sure the grammar is directly machine consumable. Richard Newman
Re: GROUP BY Seaborne, Andy
Re: Please make sure the grammar is directly machine consumable. Seaborne, Andy
Re: GROUP BY Bruce D'Arcus
Re: GROUP BY Seaborne, Andy

Saturday, 20 August 2005

Re: Please make sure the grammar is directly machine consumable. Richard Newman
Re: GROUP BY Bruce D'Arcus
Re: GROUP BY Danny Ayers

Friday, 19 August 2005

Re: GROUP BY Richard Newman
Re: Please make sure the grammar is directly machine consumable. Tim Berners-Lee

Thursday, 18 August 2005

Re: Please make sure the grammar is directly machine consumable. Richard Newman
Please make sure the grammar is directly machine consumable. Tim Berners-Lee

Wednesday, 17 August 2005

General Document Comments Ryan Levering
Re: twinql Retrospective Richard Newman
Re: twinql Retrospective Dan Connolly
Re: twinql Retrospective (DESCRIBE refinement) Dan Connolly
Re: twinql Retrospective (UNION implementation experience) Dan Connolly
Re: twinql Retrospective (optional dot grammar woes) Dan Connolly

Tuesday, 16 August 2005

Re: SPARQL Query Results XML Format: XML 1.1 [CLOSED] Dave Beckett

Monday, 15 August 2005

Re: twinql Retrospective Dan Connolly

Saturday, 13 August 2005

Re: SPARQL variable names syntax: Second trial Seaborne, Andy
Re: SPARQL variable names syntax: Second trial Walid Maalej

Thursday, 11 August 2005

Re: SPARQL Query Results XML Format: XML 1.1 [OK?] Dave Beckett

Wednesday, 10 August 2005

twinql Retrospective Richard Newman
Roman Numeral test Was: Bug: "A value disjunction that encounters a type error on only one branch will return the result of evaluating the other branch." Tim Berners-Lee
Re: SPARQL Query Results XML Format: XML 1.1 Philippe Le Hegaret
Re: SPARQL Query Results XML Format: XML 1.1 Dave Beckett

Monday, 8 August 2005

Saturday, 6 August 2005

Re: SPARQL Results Format and Unbound Variables Richard Newman
SPARQL Results Format and Unbound Variables Ron Alford

Wednesday, 3 August 2005

Re: SPARQL Query Results XML Format: XML 1.1 Dan Connolly
Re: SPARQL Query Results XML Format: XML 1.1 Philippe Le Hegaret
Re: SPARQL Query Results XML Format: XML 1.1 Dan Connolly
SPARQL Query Results XML Format: XML 1.1 Philippe Le Hegaret

Tuesday, 2 August 2005

SPARQL variable names syntax Walid Maalej
Re: Sparql editorial comment: acknowledge prior art Dan Connolly
Re: Query forms should be resources, not operations Mark Baker
Re: [OK?] Bug: "A value disjunction that encounters a type error on only one branch will return the result of evaluating the other branch." Eric Prud'hommeaux
Re: [OK?] Bug: "A value disjunction that encounters a type error on only one branch will return the result of evaluating the other branch." Tim Berners-Lee
Re: [OK?] Bug: "A value disjunction that encounters a type error on only one branch will return the result of evaluating the other branch." Eric Prud'hommeaux
[OK?] Bug: "A value disjunction that encounters a type error on only one branch will return the result of evaluating the other branch." Eric Prud'hommeaux
Re: Query forms should be resources, not operations Kendall Clark
Bug: "A value disjunction that encounters a type error on only one branch will return the result of evaluating the other branch." Tim Berners-Lee
SPARQL: Editorial comments on Last Call WD Ivan Herman
[Closed]: SPARQL: use of "my", etc in examples Seaborne, Andy

Monday, 1 August 2005

Re: SPARQL: Charmod conformance Bjoern Hoehrmann
Re: SPARQL: Charmod conformance Dan Connolly
Re: SPARQL: use of "my", etc in examples Bjoern Hoehrmann
[closed]: SPARQL: XML 1.1 EBNF normative Dan Connolly
[closed]: SPARQL: Misspelled terms Dan Connolly
[closed]: SPARQL: RFC 3066 reference normative Dan Connolly
[closed]: SPARQL: missing references in appendix Dan Connolly
SPARQL: format based on Unicode? Bjoern Hoehrmann
[closed]: SPARQL: test-manifest.n3 link Dan Connolly
SPARQL: Backslashes in string literals Bjoern Hoehrmann
Re: SPARQL: Charmod conformance [OK?] Bjoern Hoehrmann
Re: SPARQL: RFC 3066 reference normative [OK?] Bjoern Hoehrmann
Re: SPARQL: XML 1.1 EBNF normative Bjoern Hoehrmann
Re: SPARQL: isURI poorly named Bjoern Hoehrmann
Re: SPARQL: Misspelled terms [OK?] Bjoern Hoehrmann
Re: SPARQL: missing references in appendix [OK?] Bjoern Hoehrmann
Re: SPARQL: test-manifest.n3 link [OK?] Bjoern Hoehrmann
Re: SPARQL: IRIs vs RDF URI References (badIRIRef) Dan Connolly
Re: SPARQL: QuotedIRIref too lax Dan Connolly
[closed]: Last Call for comments on "SPARQL Query Language for RDF" Dan Connolly
Re: SPARQL: test-manifest.n3 link [OK?] Dan Connolly
Re: SPARQL: incorrect/confusing example in 9.3 [OK?] Dan Connolly
Re: SPARQL: missing references in appendix [OK?] Dan Connolly
Re: SPARQL: External storage of queries (issues#queryMimeType) Dan Connolly
Re: SPARQL: RFC 3066 reference normative [OK?] Dan Connolly
Re: SPARQL: XML 1.1 EBNF normative [OK?] Dan Connolly
Re: SPARQL: use of "my", etc in examples [OK?] Dan Connolly
Re: SPARQL: Misspelled terms [OK?] Dan Connolly

Last message date: Wednesday, 31 August 2005 06:35:31 UTC