- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 08 Aug 2005 14:03:52 -0500
- To: Tim Berners-Lee <timbl@w3.org>, Eric Prud'hommeaux <eric@w3.org>
- Cc: public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org, Yosi Scharf <syosi@mit.edu>
On Mon, 2005-08-08 at 13:42 -0500, Dan Connolly wrote: > FYI, there's another test case available to study: > > Roman numeral test Dave Beckett (Monday, 8 August) > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2005JulSep/0228.html > > -> > > http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/data/ValueTesting/roman.rq > http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/data/ValueTesting/roman.n3 > http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/data/ValueTesting/roman-result.n3 > > > Yosi, if you could look at that soon, I'd appreciate it. I just looked at it with that cwm sparql server on mr-burns, yosi. It gives 0 results, which agrees with the last call design (and disagrees with the roman-results.n3 sketch). TimBL, can you confirm that cwm is giving 0 results by design? > The valueTesting issue (http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/issues#valueTesting ) > is on the agenda for tomorrow's teleconference, and it would > be nice to have input from the cwm/swap project in hand. [...] -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541 0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Monday, 8 August 2005 19:03:55 UTC