Re: Bug: "A value disjunction that encounters a type error on only one branch will return the result of evaluating the other branch."

On Mon, 2005-08-08 at 13:42 -0500, Dan Connolly wrote:
> FYI, there's another test case available to study:
> 
> Roman numeral test Dave Beckett (Monday, 8 August)
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2005JulSep/0228.html
> 
> ->
> 
> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/data/ValueTesting/roman.rq
> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/data/ValueTesting/roman.n3
> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/data/ValueTesting/roman-result.n3
> 
> 
> Yosi, if you could look at that soon, I'd appreciate it.

I just looked at it with that cwm sparql server on mr-burns, yosi.

It gives 0 results, which agrees with the last call design
(and disagrees with the roman-results.n3 sketch).

TimBL, can you confirm that cwm is giving 0 results by design?


> The valueTesting issue (http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/issues#valueTesting )
> is on the agenda for tomorrow's teleconference, and it would
> be nice to have input from the cwm/swap project in hand.
[...]

-- 
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541  0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E