W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org > August 2005

Re: twinql Retrospective

From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2005 18:03:02 -0500
To: Richard Newman <r.newman@reading.ac.uk>
Cc: public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org
Message-Id: <1124319782.5099.85.camel@dirk>

On Wed, 2005-08-10 at 09:34 -0700, Richard Newman wrote:
>    This being last call, it is not the time to be discussing core  
> decisions, such as features, support for inference, etc., so I'll  
> leave those, and finish here.

Well, we'd like to think that we've reached consensus with the community
on requirements, yes.

But if you would like us to reconsider our position on requirements,
that's not strictly out of order at this point. Better to let us
know sooner rather than later.

> [1] <http://www.holygoat.co.uk/projects/twinql/>
> [2] <http://wilbur-rdf.sourceforge.net/>
> [3] <http://www.holygoat.co.uk/blog/entry/2005-07-12-3>
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541  0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Wednesday, 17 August 2005 23:03:11 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:01:21 UTC