W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org > August 2005

Re: twinql Retrospective

From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2005 18:03:02 -0500
To: Richard Newman <r.newman@reading.ac.uk>
Cc: public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org
Message-Id: <1124319782.5099.85.camel@dirk> 

On Wed, 2005-08-10 at 09:34 -0700, Richard Newman wrote:
[...]
>    This being last call, it is not the time to be discussing core  
> decisions, such as features, support for inference, etc., so I'll  
> leave those, and finish here.

Well, we'd like to think that we've reached consensus with the community
on requirements, yes.
  http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-dawg-uc/

But if you would like us to reconsider our position on requirements,
that's not strictly out of order at this point. Better to let us
know sooner rather than later.

> [1] <http://www.holygoat.co.uk/projects/twinql/>
> [2] <http://wilbur-rdf.sourceforge.net/>
> [3] <http://www.holygoat.co.uk/blog/entry/2005-07-12-3>
-- 
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541  0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Wednesday, 17 August 2005 23:03:11 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:01:21 UTC