- From: Richard Newman <rich@holygoat.co.uk>
- Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2005 09:18:29 -0700
- To: Bruce D'Arcus <bdarcus@gmail.com>, public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org
Bruce, I'm forwarding this to the DAWG list, where folk more knowledgeable than I will be able to provide comments. -R On 19 Aug 2005, at 07:33, Bruce D'Arcus wrote: > Rich, > > I think I mentioned this before, but one thing that would be nice to > have in SPARQL is the "GROUP BY" function (in SQL, and now XSLT 2.0). > Do you know if there's been talk of that? > > In the citeprc, the most complicated processing is probably the > grouping stuff. Doing it in XSLT 1.0 is even more complicated. I saw > Danny A. mnetion it awhile back on his blog, but am not finding much > more. > > The XML result format, BTW, is cool, and I could see just piping it to > an XSLT processor, except for the limitation that XML content is > escaped. I guess one could pipe it first though a script that > reconstructed it. Oh well, no time to seriously think about this now > anyway. > > Bruce > >
Received on Saturday, 20 August 2005 08:31:05 UTC