public-rdf-comments@w3.org from October 2013 by author

Dave Longley

• JSON-LD implementation reports (Tuesday, 22 October)
• JSON-LD implementation reports (Wednesday, 2 October)

David Booth

• Re: RDF Semantics - datatypes and "identifies" vs "denotes" - ISSUE-145 (Tuesday, 29 October)
• RDF Semantics - datatypes and "identifies" vs "denotes" - ISSUE-145 (Tuesday, 29 October)
• [RESOLVED] Re: Your comments on RDF Semantics - ISSUE-159 (Thursday, 24 October)
• [RESOLVED] Re: RDF Concepts - Definition of "Generalized RDF" - ISSUE-147 (Wednesday, 23 October)
• Re: Your comments on RDFConcepts & Semantics (ISSUE-145, ISSUE-147, ISSUE-148, ISSUE-159) (Monday, 21 October)
• Re: Your comments on RDFConcepts & Semantics (ISSUE-145, ISSUE-147, ISSUE-148, ISSUE-159) (Monday, 21 October)
• [RESOLVED] Re: RDF Semantics - Intuitive summary needs to be scoped to interpretations (ISSUE-149) (Tuesday, 15 October)
• Re: RDF Semantics - Definition of "Interpretation" is missing (ISSUE-159) (Saturday, 12 October)
• RDF Semantics - Definition of "Interpretation" is missing (Thursday, 10 October)
• Re: RDF Semantics - Intuitive summary needs to be scoped to interpretations (Friday, 4 October)
• Re: RDF Concepts - IRIs do *not* always denote the same resource (Friday, 4 October)
• RDF Semantics - Intuitive summary needs to be scoped to interpretations (Wednesday, 2 October)
• Re: rdfs:Graph ? comment on http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf11-concepts/#section-dataset and issue 35 (Wednesday, 2 October)
• RDF Concepts - IRIs do *not* always denote the same resource (Wednesday, 2 October)
• RDF Concepts - Definition of "Generalized RDF" (Wednesday, 2 October)
• RDF Semantics - Identify vs. Denote distinction is not helpful (Wednesday, 2 October)
• Re: Minor normative error in LC drafts (Wednesday, 2 October)

David Wood

• Re: Comments on Last-Call Working Draft of RDF 1.1 Concepts and Abstract Syntax (Monday, 21 October)
• Fwd: RDF Concepts - Definition of "Generalized RDF" (Wednesday, 16 October)
• Re: references and acknowledgements …. (trumpet blowing) (Wednesday, 16 October)
• Re: RDF Concepts - Definition of "Generalized RDF" (Wednesday, 16 October)

Eric Prud'hommeaux

• Re: minor typo in Turtle CR (Wednesday, 30 October)
• Re: RDF Concepts - IRIs do *not* always denote the same resource (Thursday, 3 October)

Gavin Carothers

• Re: PROPOSED to RESOLVE ISSUE-127 with Canonical N-Triples (Friday, 18 October)
• Re: nanopublications are they ok with RDF graphs? (Friday, 18 October)
• Re: N-Triples LC WD typos (Wednesday, 16 October)

Gregg Kellogg

• Updated EARL report for Ruby JSON-LD processor (Tuesday, 22 October)
• Re: RDFLib plugin for JSON-LD implementation report (Thursday, 10 October)
• Ruby JSON-LD implementation report (Wednesday, 2 October)

Guus Schreiber

• FYI: Transition Request for RDF 1.1 Concepts, Semantics, TriG, N-Triples & N-Quads to CR (Thursday, 24 October)
• Re: Comments on Last-Call Working Draft of RDF 1.1 Semantics (Tuesday, 22 October)
• Re: Your comments on RDFConcepts & Semantics (ISSUE-145, ISSUE-147, ISSUE-148, ISSUE-159) (Monday, 21 October)
• Re: rdfs:Graph ? comment on http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf11-concepts/#section-dataset and issue 35 (ISSUE-142) (Monday, 21 October)
• Re: rdfs:Graph ? comment on http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf11-concepts/#section-dataset and issue 35 (ISSUE-142) (Monday, 21 October)
• Re: rdfs:Graph ? comment on http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf11-concepts/#section-dataset and issue 35 (ISSUE-142) (Wednesday, 16 October)
• Your comments on RDFConcepts & Semantics (ISSUE-145, ISSUE-147, ISSUE-148, ISSUE-159) (Wednesday, 16 October)
• Re: reified statements in Turtle (ISSUE-152) (Tuesday, 8 October)
• Re: ISSUE-148: RDF Concepts - IRIs do *not* always denote the same resource (Sunday, 6 October)
• Last Call drafts of five RDF 1.1 documents (Thursday, 3 October)
• Re: RDF Semantics - Intuitive summary needs to be scoped to interpretations (ISSUE-149) (Wednesday, 2 October)
• Re: procedural comment on LC of Concepts and Semantics (ISSUE-146) (Wednesday, 2 October)
• Re: RDF Concepts - IRIs do *not* always denote the same resource (ISSUE-148) (Wednesday, 2 October)
• Re: RDF Concepts - Definition of "Generalized RDF" (ISSUE-147) (Wednesday, 2 October)
• Re: RDF Semantics - Identify vs. Denote distinction is not helpful (Wednesday, 2 October)
• Re: Minor normative error in LC drafts (ISSUE-144) (Wednesday, 2 October)

Henry Story

• Re: RDF Semantics - Definition of "Interpretation" is missing (Thursday, 10 October)

Jeremy J Carroll

• Re: rdfs:Graph ? comment on http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf11-concepts/#section-dataset and issue 35 (ISSUE-142) (Monday, 21 October)
• Re: nanopublications are they ok with RDF graphs? (Friday, 18 October)
• Re: rdfs:Graph ? comment on http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf11-concepts/#section-dataset and issue 35 (ISSUE-142) (Friday, 18 October)
• Re: rdfs:Graph ? comment on http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf11-concepts/#section-dataset and issue 35 (ISSUE-142) (Wednesday, 16 October)
• Re: rdfs:Graph ? comment on http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf11-concepts/#section-dataset and issue 35 (ISSUE-142) (Monday, 14 October)
• Re: owl:imports and graph names and issue 38 (ISSUE-151) (Monday, 14 October)
• Re: procedural comment on LC of Concepts and Semantics (ISSUE-146) (Thursday, 3 October)
• Re: Minor normative error in LC drafts (Wednesday, 2 October)
• procedural comment on LC of Concepts and Semantics (Wednesday, 2 October)
• Re: rdfs:Graph ? comment on http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf11-concepts/#section-dataset and issue 35 (Tuesday, 1 October)
• Minor normative error in LC drafts (Tuesday, 1 October)

Kingsley Idehen

• Re: RDF Semantics - datatypes and "identifies" vs "denotes" - ISSUE-145 (Tuesday, 29 October)

Manu Sporny

• Re: Official response to RDF-ISSUE-163: Determine if @type overloading is acceptable for JSON-LD 1.0 (Thursday, 31 October)
• Official response to ISSUE-164: @reverse algorithm is buggy (Wednesday, 23 October)
• Fwd: Re: Official response to RDF-ISSUE-153: Blank Nodes as properties in JSON-LD (Wednesday, 23 October)
• Official response to ISSUE-162: Attempt to converge markup mechanisms for OData and JSON-LD (Tuesday, 22 October)
• Official response to RDF-ISSUE-163: Determine if @type overloading is acceptable for JSON-LD 1.0 (Tuesday, 22 October)
• Official response to RDF-ISSUE-153: Blank Nodes as properties in JSON-LD (Tuesday, 22 October)

Markus Lanthaler

• Official response to ISSUE-168: blogPost vs. post (was JSON-LD spec question) (Wednesday, 30 October)
• Updated JsonLD implementation report (Tuesday, 22 October)
• RE: Blank Nodes as properties in JSON-LD (RDF-ISSUE-153) (Wednesday, 9 October)
• JsonLD implementation report (Wednesday, 2 October)

Matt Wuerstl

• JSON-LD spec question (Monday, 28 October)

Michael Schneider

• Re: Comments on Last-Call Working Draft of RDF 1.1 Semantics (Sunday, 27 October)
• Re: Comments on Last-Call Working Draft of RDF 1.1 Semantics (Sunday, 27 October)
• Re: FYI: Transition Request for RDF 1.1 Concepts, Semantics, TriG, N-Triples & N-Quads to CR (Friday, 25 October)
• Re: Datatype Maps, was Re: Comments on Last-Call Working Draft of RDF 1.1 Semantics (Tuesday, 22 October)
• Comments on Last-Call Working Draft of RDF 1.1 Semantics (Monday, 21 October)
• Re: Comments on Last-Call Working Draft of RDF 1.1 Concepts and Abstract Syntax (Monday, 21 October)
• Comments on Last-Call Working Draft of RDF 1.1 Concepts and Abstract Syntax (Saturday, 19 October)

Niklas Lindström

• Re: RDFLib plugin for JSON-LD implementation report (Tuesday, 22 October)
• RDFLib plugin for JSON-LD implementation report (Wednesday, 9 October)

Pat Hayes

• Re: RDF Semantics - datatypes and "identifies" vs "denotes" - ISSUE-145 (Tuesday, 29 October)
• Re: Your comments on RDFConcepts & Semantics (ISSUE-145, ISSUE-147, ISSUE-148, ISSUE-159) (Thursday, 24 October)
• Re: Comments on Last-Call Working Draft of RDF 1.1 Semantics (Wednesday, 23 October)
• Re: Your comments on RDFConcepts & Semantics (ISSUE-145, ISSUE-147, ISSUE-148, ISSUE-159) (Wednesday, 23 October)
• Re: Datatype Maps, was Re: Comments on Last-Call Working Draft of RDF 1.1 Semantics (Wednesday, 23 October)
• Response to ISSUE-159 (Tuesday, 15 October)
• Re: RDF Semantics - Identify vs. Denote distinction is not helpful (Friday, 4 October)
• Re: RDF Semantics - Intuitive summary needs to be scoped to interpretations (Friday, 4 October)

Paul Groth

• Re: nanopublications are they ok with RDF graphs? (Wednesday, 23 October)

Peter F. Patel-Schneider

• Re: owl:imports and graph names and issue 38 (ISSUE-151) (Friday, 11 October)
• Re: rdfs:Graph ? comment on http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf11-concepts/#section-dataset and issue 35 (ISSUE-142) (Friday, 11 October)
• Re: RDF Semantics - Definition of "Interpretation" is missing (ISSUE-159) (Friday, 11 October)
• Re: RDF Semantics - Intuitive summary needs to be scoped to interpretations (ISSUE-149) (Wednesday, 9 October)

Peter Patel-Schneider

• Re: Minor normative error in LC drafts (Wednesday, 2 October)

Pierre-Antoine Champin

• Re: Official response to ISSUE-164: @reverse algorithm is buggy (Wednesday, 23 October)

Ryan Laboucane

• Blank Nodes as properties in JSON-LD (Saturday, 5 October)

Sandro Hawke

• Datatype Maps, was Re: Comments on Last-Call Working Draft of RDF 1.1 Semantics (Tuesday, 22 October)
• Re: Comments on Last-Call Working Draft of RDF 1.1 Concepts and Abstract Syntax (Sunday, 20 October)
• Re: rdfs:Graph ? comment on http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf11-concepts/#section-dataset and issue 35 (Wednesday, 2 October)
• Re: RDF Concepts - Definition of "Generalized RDF" (Wednesday, 2 October)

Simon Grant

• Re: Official response to RDF-ISSUE-163: Determine if @type overloading is acceptable for JSON-LD 1.0 (Thursday, 31 October)
• Re: Official response to RDF-ISSUE-163: Determine if @type overloading is acceptable for JSON-LD 1.0 (Tuesday, 22 October)

Last message date: Thursday, 31 October 2013 22:06:39 UTC