- From: Jeremy J Carroll <jjc@syapse.com>
- Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2013 12:36:02 -0700
- To: Guus Schreiber <guus.schreiber@vu.nl>
- Cc: "public-rdf-comments@w3.org Comments" <public-rdf-comments@w3.org>, "David Booth" <david@dbooth.org>
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/semantic-web/2013Oct/0022.html addresses my comment to my full satisfaction. Thank you Jeremy J Carroll Principal Architect Syapse, Inc. On Oct 2, 2013, at 4:25 AM, Guus Schreiber <guus.schreiber@vu.nl> wrote: > Dear Jeremy, > > Thanks for your comment. We have raised an issue for tracking your comment [1]. We will get back to you on this. > > Best, > Guus, on behalf of the RDF WG > > [1] https://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/track/issues/146 > > On 02-10-13 04:06, Jeremy J Carroll wrote: >> >> >> David's earlier message seems to highlight a procedural irregularity. >> >> I think it is a reasonable expectation that the RDF WG invite Semantic >> Web interest group participants to review the last call documents, and >> this does not appear to have been done in this case. >> >> >> http://www.w3.org/2005/10/Process-20051014/tr.html#last-call >> "The Working Group must announce the Last Call to other W3C groups" >> >> and >> >> http://www.w3.org/2011/01/rdf-wg-charter >> [[ >> Semantic Web Coordination Group <http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/CG/> >> To ensure synchronization with all other Working and Interest Groups >> in the Semantic Web Activity. >> ]] >> >> >> Synchronization seems to have been lacking in this case. >> >> >> Jeremy J Carroll >> Principal Architect >> Syapse, Inc. >> >> >>
Received on Thursday, 3 October 2013 19:36:30 UTC