Re: RDFLib plugin for JSON-LD implementation report

Niklas, thanks for the report, and congratulations on achieving such a level of conformance! I have integrated it into the updated JSON-LD Implementation report [4].

I noticed the following errors in the report, which kept it from running smoothly the first time:

* The Project description for <https://github.com/RDFLib/rdflib-jsonld#it> should reference a doap:developer, I added it as <https://github.com/RDFLib/rdflib-jsonld#it>. 

Gregg Kellogg
gregg@greggkellogg.net

[4] http://json-ld.org/test-suite/reports/

On Oct 9, 2013, at 4:38 PM, Niklas Lindström <lindstream@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hello,
> 
> The Python-based JSON-LD plugin for RDFLib [1] passes 97% of the JSON-LD tests for fromRdf and toRdf [2]. The EARL report in Turtle format can be found at [3].
> 
> The four failing tests are:
> 
> * fromRdf-0002, toRdf-0035, toRdf-0101 – fail due to the underlying RDFLib Literal implementation, which doesn't preserve the lexical represtation for (e.g.) double values; and
> * fromRdf-0008 – fails since compact lists-of-lists are supported in this implementation, although it is now allowed per the specification.
> 
> The implementation also supports flattening, compaction and expansion, but only to/from RDF graphs/datasets. It thus cannot be tested against the test suite, which targets the directly JSON-based mechanics of the algorithms.
> 
> Cheers,
> Niklas
> 
> [1] https://github.com/RDFLib/rdflib-jsonld
> [2] http://json-ld.org/test-suite/
> [3] https://raw.github.com/json-ld/json-ld.org/b800e00be782c5dac8512510db82f970918513ac/test-suite/reports/rdflib-jsonld-earl.ttl
>