- From: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
- Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2013 06:48:53 -0400
- To: RDF WG Comments <public-rdf-comments@w3.org>
-------- Original Message -------- Subject: Re: Official response to RDF-ISSUE-153: Blank Nodes as properties in JSON-LD Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2013 16:53:43 +0900 From: Ryan Laboucane <wasabiwimp@gmail.com> To: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com> This does indeed answer my concerns. In fact, having the ability to legally use blank nodes as properties in RDF is a considerably better result than I had anticipated. Thanks a lot! Ryan Laboucane On Oct 22, 2013 5:27 PM, "Manu Sporny" <msporny@digitalbazaar.com <mailto:msporny@digitalbazaar.com>> wrote: Hi Ryan, Thank you for your feedback on the JSON-LD specifications. This is an official response to RDF ISSUE-153: Ryan Laboucane: Blank Nodes as properties in JSON-LD, which is being tracked here: http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/__track/issues/153 <http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/track/issues/153> You were concerned that we may remove blank nodes as properties in JSON-LD. After passing the specifications through the Last Call and Candidate Recommendation phases, there have been no requests to remove the feature. In addition, an "extended" mode of RDF, called Generalized RDF, has been defined that allows blank node properties. Due to this change, the pressure to remove blank node properties has been reduced. At this point, both the JSON-LD group and the RDF WG have decided to keep the ability to have blank node properties as a feature in the JSON-LD specification. We believe this addresses your concern. Please respond as soon as possible to this email to tell us whether or not you are satisfied with the changes we made. -- manu -- Manu Sporny (skype: msporny, twitter: manusporny, G+: +Manu Sporny) Founder/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc. blog: Meritora - Web payments commercial launch http://blog.meritora.com/__launch/ <http://blog.meritora.com/launch/>
Received on Wednesday, 23 October 2013 11:47:41 UTC