- From: Markus Lanthaler <markus.lanthaler@gmx.net>
- Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2013 16:40:07 +0200
- To: "'Ryan Laboucane'" <wasabiwimp@gmail.com>, <public-rdf-comments@w3.org>
Hi Ryan, Thank you very much for your comment. We'll take it into consideration when making the decision regarding blank node properties. I've created RDF-ISSUE-153 [1] to keep track of your comment. Thanks again, Markus [1] https://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/track/issues/153 -- Markus Lanthaler @markuslanthaler > -----Original Message----- > From: Ryan Laboucane [mailto:wasabiwimp@gmail.com] > Sent: Saturday, October 05, 2013 4:56 PM > To: public-rdf-comments@w3.org > Subject: Blank Nodes as properties in JSON-LD > > Hi, > > I just thought I'd send in a comment regarding blank nodes as > properties. > > My thoughts are that they should stay in. The constructions of > properties would be somewhat simplified if I did not have to specify an > "@id" and skolem IRI at runtime. > > My particular use case is a simple DL and reasoner with role > intersection and role union constructors. These minted roles would > appear as properties in the resulting JSON-LD ontology. > > Ryan Laboucane
Received on Wednesday, 9 October 2013 14:40:40 UTC