RE: Blank Nodes as properties in JSON-LD (RDF-ISSUE-153)

Hi Ryan,

Thank you very much for your comment. We'll take it into consideration when
making the decision regarding blank node properties. I've created
RDF-ISSUE-153 [1] to keep track of your comment.

Thanks again,


Markus Lanthaler

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ryan Laboucane []
> Sent: Saturday, October 05, 2013 4:56 PM
> To:
> Subject: Blank Nodes as properties in JSON-LD
> Hi,
> I just thought I'd send in a comment regarding blank nodes as
> properties.
> My thoughts are that they should stay in. The constructions of
> properties would be somewhat simplified if I did not have to specify an
> "@id" and skolem IRI at runtime.
> My particular use case is a simple DL and reasoner with role
> intersection and role union constructors. These minted roles would
> appear as properties in the resulting JSON-LD ontology.
> Ryan Laboucane

Received on Wednesday, 9 October 2013 14:40:40 UTC