- From: Guus Schreiber <guus.schreiber@vu.nl>
- Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2013 00:18:15 +0200
- To: Jeremy J Carroll <jjc@syapse.com>, David Booth <david@dbooth.org>, "Michael Schneider" <schneid@fzi.de>
- CC: "public-rdf-comments@w3.org Comments" <public-rdf-comments@w3.org>
Jeremy, David, Michael, (cc: public-rdf-comments) This is to let you know that we have asked for transition to CR of the documents you commented upon. The details w.r.t. the disposition of comments are in this section: http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/wiki/RDF11-CR-Request#Evidence_that_issues_have_been_formally_addressed * We left two issues open, 148 (IRIs as globals) and 165 (datatype map), as the commenter (David resp. Michael) agreed we could handle these during CR. * We closed two editorial issues (145 and 166) for which we sent a detailed response but for which we haven't heard whether the response is satisfactory. It should be no problem to take case of loose ends. if any, during CR. * We closed issue 142 without making a change, to which Jeremy Carroll formally objected. We included a link to the objection in the CR request, plus a link to Issue-167 (Stronger Semantics of datasets?) raised by the WG in response to the objection and subsequently postponed by the WG. FYI. Thanks again for your feedback! Guus
Received on Thursday, 24 October 2013 22:18:44 UTC