FYI: Transition Request for RDF 1.1 Concepts, Semantics, TriG, N-Triples & N-Quads to CR

Jeremy, David, Michael, (cc: public-rdf-comments)

This is to let you know that we have asked for transition to CR of the 
documents you commented upon. The details w.r.t. the disposition of 
comments are in this section:

* We left two issues open, 148 (IRIs as globals)  and 165 (datatype 
map), as the commenter (David resp. Michael) agreed we could handle 
these during CR.
* We closed two editorial issues (145 and 166) for which we sent a 
detailed response but for which we haven't heard whether the response is 
satisfactory. It should be no problem to take case of loose ends. if 
any, during CR.
* We closed issue 142 without making a change, to which Jeremy Carroll 
formally objected. We included a link to the objection in the CR 
request, plus a link to Issue-167 (Stronger Semantics of datasets?) 
raised by the WG in response to the objection and subsequently postponed 
by the WG.


Thanks again for your feedback!

Received on Thursday, 24 October 2013 22:18:44 UTC