procedural comment on LC of Concepts and Semantics

David's earlier message seems to highlight a procedural irregularity.

I think it is a reasonable expectation that the RDF WG invite Semantic Web interest group participants to review the last call documents, and this does not appear to have been done in this case.


http://www.w3.org/2005/10/Process-20051014/tr.html#last-call
"The Working Group must announce the Last Call to other W3C groups"

and

http://www.w3.org/2011/01/rdf-wg-charter
[[
Semantic Web Coordination Group
To ensure synchronization with all other Working and Interest Groups in the Semantic Web Activity.
]]


Synchronization seems to have been lacking in this case.


Jeremy J Carroll
Principal Architect
Syapse, Inc.

Received on Wednesday, 2 October 2013 02:07:21 UTC