- From: Guus Schreiber <guus.schreiber@vu.nl>
- Date: Wed, 2 Oct 2013 13:25:06 +0200
- To: Jeremy J Carroll <jjc@syapse.com>
- CC: "public-rdf-comments@w3.org Comments" <public-rdf-comments@w3.org>, "David Booth" <david@dbooth.org>
Dear Jeremy, Thanks for your comment. We have raised an issue for tracking your comment [1]. We will get back to you on this. Best, Guus, on behalf of the RDF WG [1] https://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/track/issues/146 On 02-10-13 04:06, Jeremy J Carroll wrote: > > > David's earlier message seems to highlight a procedural irregularity. > > I think it is a reasonable expectation that the RDF WG invite Semantic > Web interest group participants to review the last call documents, and > this does not appear to have been done in this case. > > > http://www.w3.org/2005/10/Process-20051014/tr.html#last-call > "The Working Group must announce the Last Call to other W3C groups" > > and > > http://www.w3.org/2011/01/rdf-wg-charter > [[ > Semantic Web Coordination Group <http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/CG/> > To ensure synchronization with all other Working and Interest Groups > in the Semantic Web Activity. > ]] > > > Synchronization seems to have been lacking in this case. > > > Jeremy J Carroll > Principal Architect > Syapse, Inc. > > >
Received on Wednesday, 2 October 2013 11:25:37 UTC