public-mobile-a11y-tf@w3.org from November 2016 by author

alands289@gmail.com

• RE: Agenda Nov 17 (Thursday, 17 November)
• RE: M11 Speech Input (Tuesday, 15 November)
• RE: M11 Speech Input (Tuesday, 15 November)
• RE: Agenda Nov 3 (Thursday, 3 November)

Alastair Campbell

• Re: M11 Speech Input (Tuesday, 15 November)
• Re: Inline links with large-enough activation (touch) target (rough idea) (Monday, 14 November)
• Re: Inline links with large-enough activation (touch) target (rough idea) (Monday, 14 November)
• Re: Inline links with large-enough activation (touch) target (rough idea) (Monday, 14 November)

David MacDonald

• Re: M11 Speech Input (Wednesday, 16 November)
• Re: M11 Speech Input (Wednesday, 16 November)
• Re: M11 Speech Input (Wednesday, 16 November)
• Re: M11 Speech Input (Wednesday, 16 November)
• Re: M11 Speech Input (Tuesday, 15 November)
• Re: M11 Speech Input (Tuesday, 15 November)
• Re: M11 Speech Input (Tuesday, 15 November)
• Re: M11 Speech Input (Tuesday, 15 November)
• Re: M11 Speech Input (Tuesday, 15 November)
• Re: M11 Speech Input (Tuesday, 15 November)
• Re: Regrets for next upcoming weekly calls (Monday, 14 November)
• Re: Inline links with large-enough activation (touch) target (rough idea) (Monday, 14 November)
• Re: Inline links with large-enough activation (touch) target (rough idea) (Monday, 14 November)
• Re: Is our non-interference proposal already covered in WCAG COnformance Requirement 5 (Thursday, 10 November)
• Current gaps in WCAG 2 as reported by Funka to the EU (Monday, 7 November)
• Is our non-interference proposal already covered in WCAG COnformance Requirement 5 (Saturday, 5 November)

Detlev Fischer

• Changes to SCs (Tuesday, 29 November)
• Re: Agenda Nov 17 (Thursday, 17 November)
• Re: Inline links with large-enough activation (touch) target (rough idea) (Monday, 14 November)
• Re: Inline links with large-enough activation (touch) target (rough idea) (Monday, 14 November)
• Re: Current gaps in WCAG 2 as reported by Funka to the EU (Monday, 7 November)
• Re: Is our non-interference proposal already covered in WCAG COnformance Requirement 5 (Monday, 7 November)
• M14 (Tuesday, 1 November)

Gregg Vanderheiden RTF

• Re: M11 Speech Input (Wednesday, 16 November)
• Re: M11 Speech Input (Tuesday, 15 November)
• Re: M11 Speech Input (Tuesday, 15 November)

Henny Swan

• Re: MATF Minutes 17 November 2016 (Thursday, 17 November)
• Re: Agenda Nov 3 (Thursday, 3 November)

Jonathan Avila

• RE: M11 Speech Input (Wednesday, 16 November)
• RE: M11 Speech Input (Wednesday, 16 November)
• RE: M11 Speech Input (Wednesday, 16 November)
• Re: M11 Speech Input (Tuesday, 15 November)
• Draft minutes from Nov 10 2016 teleconference (Thursday, 10 November)

Kathy Wahlbin

• Agenda Dec 1 (Tuesday, 29 November)
• RE: M11 (Monday, 21 November)
• RE: No meeting Nov 24 (Monday, 21 November)
• No meeting Nov 24 (Sunday, 20 November)
• Agenda Nov 17 (Wednesday, 16 November)
• RE: M11 Speech Input (Tuesday, 15 November)
• M11 Speech Input (Tuesday, 15 November)
• RE: Regrets for next upcoming weekly calls (Monday, 14 November)
• Agenda Nov 10 (Monday, 7 November)
• RE: Is our non-interference proposal already covered in WCAG COnformance Requirement 5 (Monday, 7 November)
• RE: Agenda Nov 3 (Tuesday, 1 November)

Kim Patch

• Re: M11 (Thursday, 17 November)
• MATF Minutes 17 November 2016 (Thursday, 17 November)
• Re: M11 Speech Input (Tuesday, 15 November)
• Re: M11 Speech Input (Tuesday, 15 November)
• MATF Minutes 3 November 2016 (Thursday, 3 November)

Michael Pluke

• RE: M11 Speech Input (Wednesday, 16 November)
• RE: M11 Speech Input (Wednesday, 16 November)

Patrick H. Lauke

• Re: Inline links with large-enough activation (touch) target (rough idea) (Monday, 14 November)
• Re: Inline links with large-enough activation (touch) target (rough idea) (Monday, 14 November)
• Re: Inline links with large-enough activation (touch) target (rough idea) (Monday, 14 November)
• Re: Inline links with large-enough activation (touch) target (rough idea) (Monday, 14 November)
• Regrets for next upcoming weekly calls (Monday, 14 November)
• Re: Inline links with large-enough activation (touch) target (rough idea) (Monday, 14 November)
• Re: Inline links with large-enough activation (touch) target (rough idea) (Monday, 14 November)
• Re: Inline links with large-enough activation (touch) target (rough idea) (Monday, 14 November)
• Re: Inline links with large-enough activation (touch) target (rough idea) (Monday, 14 November)
• Re: Inline links with large-enough activation (touch) target (rough idea) (Monday, 14 November)
• Inline links with large-enough activation (touch) target (rough idea) (Sunday, 13 November)
• Re: Is our non-interference proposal already covered in WCAG COnformance Requirement 5 (Thursday, 10 November)
• Re: Is our non-interference proposal already covered in WCAG COnformance Requirement 5 (Thursday, 10 November)
• Re: Agenda Nov 10 (Thursday, 10 November)
• Media Queries 4 Interaction Media Features ... any opinion (Tuesday, 8 November)
• Fwd: Re: Current gaps in WCAG 2 as reported by Funka to the EU (Monday, 7 November)
• Re: Is our non-interference proposal already covered in WCAG COnformance Requirement 5 (Saturday, 5 November)
• Re: Is our non-interference proposal already covered in WCAG COnformance Requirement 5 (Saturday, 5 November)
• Fwd: Re: M14 (Thursday, 3 November)

Last message date: Tuesday, 29 November 2016 13:39:27 UTC