- From: Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com>
- Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2016 12:15:02 +0000
- To: "Patrick H. Lauke" <redux@splintered.co.uk>, "public-mobile-a11y-tf@w3.org" <public-mobile-a11y-tf@w3.org>
Patrick wrote:
> A lot of sites that up until now were doing what was ok under WCAG 1 / 2 will now fail a new SC that addresses a problem not previously covered by WCAG. Seems unavoidable, I think?
Yes, it’s just this aspect in particular (now that you made it more concrete with an example!) hits home as one that makes a default site fail a new guideline. Even an un-styled site would fail, which is unusual across the guidelines.
And apologies for jumping in on a topic I haven’t followed closely, in my defence it is the sort of feedback I’d have once they all go up for review in Dec.
Cheers,
-Alastair
Received on Monday, 14 November 2016 12:15:38 UTC