- From: Patrick H. Lauke <redux@splintered.co.uk>
- Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2016 14:53:31 +0000
- To: David MacDonald <david100@sympatico.ca>
- Cc: Kathy Wahlbin <kathyw@ia11y.com>, "public-mobile-a11y-tf@w3.org" <public-mobile-a11y-tf@w3.org>
On 10/11/2016 11:31, David MacDonald wrote: > I don't understand this sentence > "This criterion differs from the Touch with AT success criterion, in > that the Touch with AT requires users not to use gestures, as the > platform AT may block them." Tried to clarify this a bit more. These notes are meant for the WCAG WG, so also clarified that. https://github.com/chriscm2006/Mobile-A11y-Extension/blob/m14/SCs/m14.md P > Cheers, > David MacDonald > > > > *Can**Adapt* *Solutions Inc.* > > Tel: 613.235.4902 > > LinkedIn > <http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidmacdonald100> > > twitter.com/davidmacd <http://twitter.com/davidmacd> > > GitHub <https://github.com/DavidMacDonald> > > www.Can-Adapt.com <http://www.can-adapt.com/> > > > > / Adapting the web to *all* users/ > > / Including those with disabilities/ > > If you are not the intended recipient, please review our privacy policy > <http://www.davidmacd.com/disclaimer.html> > > On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 4:41 AM, Patrick H. Lauke > <redux@splintered.co.uk <mailto:redux@splintered.co.uk>> wrote: > > On 07/11/2016 12:23, Kathy Wahlbin wrote: > > I agree that we should include a note for the working group. > Patrick - can you add that in Github? > > > Done. I've also tried to include the desktop/role="application" > scenario, as discussed in the call last week. Updated changes: > > https://github.com/chriscm2006/Mobile-A11y-Extension/blob/m14/SCs/m14.md > <https://github.com/chriscm2006/Mobile-A11y-Extension/blob/m14/SCs/m14.md> > > P > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Patrick H. Lauke [mailto:redux@splintered.co.uk > <mailto:redux@splintered.co.uk>] > Sent: Saturday, November 5, 2016 10:26 AM > To: public-mobile-a11y-tf@w3.org > <mailto:public-mobile-a11y-tf@w3.org> > Subject: Re: Is our non-interference proposal already covered in > WCAG COnformance Requirement 5 > > On 05/11/2016 10:15, David MacDonald wrote: > > I've been looking at the non-interference proposal, > > https://github.com/chriscm2006/Mobile-A11y-Extension/blob/d9ecc74431ee > <https://github.com/chriscm2006/Mobile-A11y-Extension/blob/d9ecc74431ee> > 5bef084b51256468838b1d9a773a/SCs/m14.md <http://m14.md> > <https://github.com/chriscm2006/Mobile-A11y-Extension/blob/d9ecc74431e > <https://github.com/chriscm2006/Mobile-A11y-Extension/blob/d9ecc74431e> > e5bef084b51256468838b1d9a773a/SCs/m14.md <http://m14.md>> > > it appears we may cover this in WCAG 2 in the conformance > requirements. > > https://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG20/#cc5 > <https://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG20/#cc5> > <https://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG20/#cc5 > <https://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG20/#cc5>> > > > For the touch scenario (where a native app can completely > override Touch AT's gesture recognition), this is arguably > covered by > > "If technologies are used in a way that is not accessibility > supported, or if they are used in a non-conforming way, then > they do not block the ability of users to access the rest of the > page." > > However, it's not clearly called out, and ensuring that > (particularly > touch) AT isn't blocked/circumvented is not explicitly covered > in the list of SCs that still need to apply to all page content > (1.4.2, 2.1.2, 2.3.1, 2.2.2). > > I'm wondering if we should add this concern (that we think the > SC we're proposing *may* already be covered by this clause 5) to > our description of the SC as a note to the working group. Having > said all that, not having an SC and instead having the concern > addressed by wording that's admittedly buried a bit is not > ideal...I know many developers who will simply go through the > list of actual SCs and never bother to read the additional stuff... > > P > > I'm trying to think of a scenario of something not covered > in our > current WCAG Conformance Requirement of non-interence that > would be > covered in our proposal ... I don't have one yet. > > Thoughts? > > Cheers, > David MacDonald > > > > *Can**Adapt* *Solutions Inc.* > > Tel: 613.235.4902 <tel:613.235.4902> > > LinkedIn > <http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidmacdonald100 > <http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidmacdonald100>> > > twitter.com/davidmacd <http://twitter.com/davidmacd> > <http://twitter.com/davidmacd> > > GitHub <https://github.com/DavidMacDonald > <https://github.com/DavidMacDonald>> > > www.Can-Adapt.com <http://www.Can-Adapt.com> > <http://www.can-adapt.com/> > > > > / Adapting the web to *all* users/ > > / Including those with disabilities/ > > If you are not the intended recipient, please review our privacy > policy <http://www.davidmacd.com/disclaimer.html > <http://www.davidmacd.com/disclaimer.html>> > > > > -- > Patrick H. Lauke > > www.splintered.co.uk <http://www.splintered.co.uk> | > https://github.com/patrickhlauke > <https://github.com/patrickhlauke> > http://flickr.com/photos/redux/ > <http://flickr.com/photos/redux/> | http://redux.deviantart.com > twitter: @patrick_h_lauke | skype: patrick_h_lauke > > > > -- > Patrick H. Lauke > > www.splintered.co.uk <http://www.splintered.co.uk> | > https://github.com/patrickhlauke <https://github.com/patrickhlauke> > http://flickr.com/photos/redux/ <http://flickr.com/photos/redux/> | > http://redux.deviantart.com > twitter: @patrick_h_lauke | skype: patrick_h_lauke > > -- Patrick H. Lauke www.splintered.co.uk | https://github.com/patrickhlauke http://flickr.com/photos/redux/ | http://redux.deviantart.com twitter: @patrick_h_lauke | skype: patrick_h_lauke
Received on Thursday, 10 November 2016 14:54:03 UTC