Tuesday, 29 April 2014
- Re: gUM and persistent permissions
- Re: gUM and persistent permissions
- Re: gUM and persistent permissions
- Re: gUM and persistent permissions
- Re: gUM and persistent permissions
Monday, 28 April 2014
- Re: [Bug 25298] How to represent VideoFacingMode if browser is not able to detect the FacingMode of the camera.
- Re: [Bug 25298] How to represent VideoFacingMode if browser is not able to detect the FacingMode of the camera.
- Re: gUM and persistent permissions
- Re: [Bug 25298] How to represent VideoFacingMode if browser is not able to detect the FacingMode of the camera.
- gUM and persistent permissions
- Re: [Bug 25298] How to represent VideoFacingMode if browser is not able to detect the FacingMode of the camera.
- Some code: Constraint transformations
- [Bug 22354] Security and Privacy Considerations section needed
Sunday, 27 April 2014
Friday, 25 April 2014
- Re: Screen sharing
- Re: Screen sharing
- Re: WebIDL-compatible syntax compromise
- Re: Screen sharing - document structure
- Re: Screen sharing
- Re: [Bug 25361] Media Capture and Streams spec should explicitly specify that recvonly streams / tracks should be considered as muted.
- [Bug 24931] the spec defines an interface called “MediaError”, which conflicts with the “MediaError” defined for the MediaElement (video/audio tags)
- [Bug 25441] Overconstrained muted state should not link with MediaStreamTrack.readyState
- RE: [Bug 25361] Media Capture and Streams spec should explicitly specify that recvonly streams / tracks should be considered as muted.
- [Bug 25361] Media Capture and Streams spec should explicitly specify that recvonly streams / tracks should be considered as muted.
- [Bug 25441] Overconstrained muted state should not link with MediaStreamTrack.readyState
- [Bug 25361] Media Capture and Streams spec should explicitly specify that recvonly streams / tracks should be considered as muted.
- Screen sharing - document structure
- [Bug 22354] Security and Privacy Considerations section needed
- Re: Screen sharing
Thursday, 24 April 2014
- Re: Screen sharing
- Re: Screen sharing
- Re: Screen sharing
- Re: Screen sharing
- Re: Screen sharing
- Re: Screen sharing
- Screen sharing
- [Bug 25441] New: Overconstrained muted state should not link with MediaStreamTrack.readyState
- Re: Re: [Bug 25361] Media Capture and Streams spec should explicitly specify that recvonly streams / tracks should be considered as muted.
- Re: [Bug 25361] Media Capture and Streams spec should explicitly specify that recvonly streams / tracks should be considered as muted.
- Re: Re: [Bug 25361] Media Capture and Streams spec should explicitly specify that recvonly streams / tracks should be considered as muted.
- Re: [Bug 25361] Media Capture and Streams spec should explicitly specify that recvonly streams / tracks should be considered as muted.
- [Bug 25361] Media Capture and Streams spec should explicitly specify that recvonly streams / tracks should be considered as muted.
- [Bug 25298] How to represent VideoFacingMode if browser is not able to detect the FacingMode of the camera.
Wednesday, 23 April 2014
- Re: Security considerations section - a proposal
- Re: Security considerations section - a proposal
- Re: Security considerations section - a proposal
- Re: Security considerations section - a proposal
- Security considerations section - a proposal
- use of bugzilla comments vs the list (Re: [Bug 25298] How to represent...)
- [Bug 25361] Media Capture and Streams spec should explicitly specify that recvonly streams / tracks should be considered as muted.
Tuesday, 22 April 2014
- Re: WebIDL-compatible syntax compromise
- [Bug 25361] Media Capture and Streams spec should explicitly specify that recvonly streams / tracks should be considered as muted.
- [Bug 22365] The spec should explicitly say something about getUserMedia() in an iframe.
- [Bug 23928] Define Error basic information "as used in these specs".
- [Bug 22263] Clarify synchronization of tracks in a MediaStream
- [Bug 22354] Security and Privacy Considerations section needed
- [Bug 25275] VideoTrackList.selectedIndex initialization confilicts with HTML5 spec, "if no track is selected".
- [Bug 25298] How to represent VideoFacingMode if browser is not able to detect the FacingMode of the camera.
Saturday, 19 April 2014
Friday, 18 April 2014
- Re: WebIDL-compatible syntax compromise
- Re: Permission dialog across pages, domains
- Re: Permission dialog across pages, domains
- Re: WebIDL-compatible syntax compromise
- Re: Permission dialog across pages, domains
- Re: Permission dialog across pages, domains
- Permission dialog across pages, domains
Thursday, 17 April 2014
- [Bug 25298] How to represent VideoFacingMode if browser is not able to detect the FacingMode of the camera.
- [Bug 25275] VideoTrackList.selectedIndex initialization confilicts with HTML5 spec, "if no track is selected".
- [Bug 25298] How to represent VideoFacingMode if browser is not able to detect the FacingMode of the camera.
Wednesday, 16 April 2014
- Re: [Bug 25275] VideoTrackList.selectedIndex initialization confilicts with HTML5 spec, "if no track is selected".
- [Bug 25298] How to represent VideoFacingMode if browser is not able to detect the FacingMode of the camera.
- [Bug 25298] How to represent VideoFacingMode if browser is not able to detect the FacingMode of the camera.
- Re: [Bug 25275] VideoTrackList.selectedIndex initialization confilicts with HTML5 spec, "if no track is selected".
- [Bug 25360] MediaStreamTrack should not be considered as ended just because remote peer stopped sending data.
- [Bug 25360] MediaStreamTrack should not be considered as ended just because remote peer stopped sending data.
- [Bug 25360] MediaStreamTrack should not be considered as ended just because remote peer stopped sending data.
- [Bug 25360] MediaStreamTrack should not be considered as ended just because remote peer stopped sending data.
- [Bug 25360] MediaStreamTrack should not be considered as ended just because remote peer stopped sending data.
- Re: [Bug 25360] New: MediaStreamTrack should not be considered as ended just because remote peer stopped sending data.
- [Bug 25275] VideoTrackList.selectedIndex initialization confilicts with HTML5 spec, "if no track is selected".
- Re: [Bug 25275] VideoTrackList.selectedIndex initialization confilicts with HTML5 spec, "if no track is selected".
- [Bug 25298] How to represent VideoFacingMode if browser is not able to detect the FacingMode of the camera.
- [Bug 25298] How to represent VideoFacingMode if browser is not able to detect the FacingMode of the camera.
- Re: [Bug 25361] New: Media Capture and Streams spec should explicitly specify that recvonly streams / tracks should be considered as muted.
- Re: [Bug 25360] New: MediaStreamTrack should not be considered as ended just because remote peer stopped sending data.
- Re: [Bug 25275] VideoTrackList.selectedIndex initialization confilicts with HTML5 spec, "if no track is selected".
- [Bug 25361] New: Media Capture and Streams spec should explicitly specify that recvonly streams / tracks should be considered as muted.
- [Bug 25360] New: MediaStreamTrack should not be considered as ended just because remote peer stopped sending data.
- Re: Re: Re: [Bug 25275] VideoTrackList.selectedIndex initialization confilicts with HTML5 spec, "if no track is selected".
- Re: Re: [Bug 25275] VideoTrackList.selectedIndex initialization confilicts with HTML5 spec, "if no track is selected".
Tuesday, 15 April 2014
- Re: [Bug 25275] VideoTrackList.selectedIndex initialization confilicts with HTML5 spec, "if no track is selected".
- Re: Re: [Bug 25275] VideoTrackList.selectedIndex initialization confilicts with HTML5 spec, "if no track is selected".
- Re: [Bug 25275] VideoTrackList.selectedIndex initialization confilicts with HTML5 spec, "if no track is selected".
- Re: Re: [Bug 25275] VideoTrackList.selectedIndex initialization confilicts with HTML5 spec, "if no track is selected".
Monday, 14 April 2014
- Re: [Bug 25275] VideoTrackList.selectedIndex initialization confilicts with HTML5 spec, "if no track is selected".
- Re: [Bug 25275] VideoTrackList.selectedIndex initialization confilicts with HTML5 spec, "if no track is selected".
- Re: [Bug 25275] VideoTrackList.selectedIndex initialization confilicts with HTML5 spec, "if no track is selected".
- Re: [Bug 25275] VideoTrackList.selectedIndex initialization confilicts with HTML5 spec, "if no track is selected".
- [Bug 25275] VideoTrackList.selectedIndex initialization confilicts with HTML5 spec, "if no track is selected".
Friday, 11 April 2014
- [Bug 25275] VideoTrackList.selectedIndex initialization confilicts with HTML5 spec, "if no track is selected".
- [Bug 25276] Initialization for VideoTrack.selected attribute is missing while specifying steps for "Loading and Playing a MediaStream in a Media Element"
- Re: [Bug 25245] Specify "access" in the context of getMediaDevices
Thursday, 10 April 2014
- [Bug 25275] VideoTrackList.selectedIndex initialization confilicts with HTML5 spec, "if no track is selected".
- Re: [Bug 25245] Specify "access" in the context of getMediaDevices
- Incorporate "WebIDL-compatible syntax compromise" in Editor's draft
- [Bug 25276] Initialization for VideoTrack.selected attribute is missing while specifying steps for "Loading and Playing a MediaStream in a Media Element"
- [Bug 25275] VideoTrackList.selectedIndex initialization confilicts with HTML5 spec, "if no track is selected".
- [Bug 25275] VideoTrackList.selectedIndex initialization confilicts with HTML5 spec, "if no track is selected".
- [Bug 25262] MediaStream Constructor algorithm must also check for MediaStreamTracks "ended" state while initializing "active" state.
- [Bug 25250] Ended track should not be added to MediaStream, when addTrack() is invoked for and ended track.
- [Bug 25250] Ended track should not be added to MediaStream, when addTrack() is invoked for and ended track.
- [Bug 22259] Disabled mediastreamtrack and state of media element
- [Bug 25248] MediaStreamTrack.stop() should fire ended event.
- [Bug 25249] Source should be detached when a MediaStreamTrack stops for any reason other than stop
- [Bug 25249] Source should be detached when a MediaStreamTrack stops for any reason other than stop
Wednesday, 9 April 2014
- [Bug 25298] How to represent VideoFacingMode if browser is not able to detect the FacingMode of the camera.
- [Bug 25298] How to represent VideoFacingMode if browser is not able to detect the FacingMode of the camera.
- [Bug 25298] How to represent VideoFacingMode if browser is not able to detect the FacingMode of the camera.
- [Bug 25298] How to represent VideoFacingMode if browser is not able to detect the FacingMode of the camera.
- [Bug 25298] How to represent VideoFacingMode if browser is not able to detect the FacingMode of the camera.
- [Bug 25298] How to represent VideoFacingMode if browser is not able to detect the FacingMode of the camera.
- [Bug 25298] How to represent VideoFacingMode if browser is not able to detect the FacingMode of the camera.
- [Bug 25298] How to represent VideoFacingMode if browser is not able to detect the FacingMode of the camera.
- [Bug 25245] Specify "access" in the context of getMediaDevices
- [Bug 25298] How to represent VideoFacingMode if browser is not able to detect the FacingMode of the camera.
- [Bug 25245] Specify "access" in the context of getMediaDevices
- [Bug 25298] How to represent VideoFacingMode if browser is not able to detect the FacingMode of the camera.
- [Bug 25298] How to represent VideoFacingMode if browser is not able to detect the FacingMode of the camera.
- [Bug 25298] New: How to represent VideoFacingMode if browser is not able to detect the FacingMode of the camera.
- [Bug 25245] Specify "access" in the context of getMediaDevices
- [Bug 25245] Specify "access" in the context of getMediaDevices
Tuesday, 8 April 2014
- [Bug 25248] MediaStreamTrack.stop() should fire ended event.
- [Bug 25248] MediaStreamTrack.stop() should fire ended event.
- [Bug 25248] MediaStreamTrack.stop() should fire ended event.
Monday, 7 April 2014
- [Bug 25245] Specify "access" in the context of getMediaDevices
- Re: status of authorization process for getMediaDevices
- [Bug 25245] Specify "access" in the context of getMediaDevices
Saturday, 5 April 2014
- [Bug 25276] New: Initialization for VideoTrack.selected attribute is missing while specifying steps for "Loading and Playing a MediaStream in a Media Element"
- [Bug 25275] New: VideoTrackList.selectedIndex initialization confilicts with HTML5 spec, "if no track is selected".
Friday, 4 April 2014
- [Bug 25262] New: MediaStream Constructor algorithm must also check for MediaStreamTracks "ended" state while initializing "active" state.
- Re: [Bug 25250] Ended track should not be added to MediaStream, when addTrack() is invoked for and ended track.
- [Bug 23928] Define Error basic information "as used in these specs".
- [Bug 25250] Ended track should not be added to MediaStream, when addTrack() is invoked for and ended track.
- [Bug 25250] Ended track should not be added to MediaStream, when addTrack() is invoked for and ended track.
- [Bug 24928] the spec defines the addtrack event as part of the MediaStream interface, but never calls out when the event should be fired.
- [Bug 25250] Ended track should not be added to MediaStream, when addTrack() is invoked for and ended track.
- Fwd: Joint Interim meeting May 19-21, 2014
- [Bug 25250] Ended track should not be added to MediaStream, when addTrack() is invoked for and ended track.
Thursday, 3 April 2014
- Re: [Bug 25247] New: getCapabilities needs to decide what scope(s) it's available at
- Re: [Bug 25250] New: Ended track should not be added to MediaStream, when addTrack() is invoked for and ended track.
- Re: [Bug 25245] Specify "access" in the context of getMediaDevices
- [Bug 25250] New: Ended track should not be added to MediaStream, when addTrack() is invoked for and ended track.
- [Bug 25249] New: Source should be detached when a MediaStreamTrack stops for any reason other than stop
- Re: [Bug 22593] Capabilities are buggy
- [Bug 25248] MediaStreamTrack.stop() should fire ended event.
- [Bug 25248] New: MediaStreamTrack.stop() should fire ended event.
- Re: Can constraints constrain by default?
- [Bug 22593] Capabilities are buggy
- Re: [Bug 22593] Capabilities are buggy
- [Bug 22259] Disabled mediastreamtrack and state of media element
- [Bug 22259] Disabled mediastreamtrack and state of media element
- [Bug 22259] Disabled mediastreamtrack and state of media element
- [Bug 22365] The spec should explicitly say something about getUserMedia() in an iframe.
- [Bug 22259] Disabled mediastreamtrack and state of media element
- [Bug 22365] The spec should explicitly say something about getUserMedia() in an iframe.
- [Bug 22209] "each key MUST be a valid registered constraint name in the IANA-hosted RTCWeb Media Constraints registry"
- [Bug 22259] Disabled mediastreamtrack and state of media element
- [Bug 22217] What happens if mediastream source becomes unavailable during the consent prompt?
- [Bug 22260] Give guidance on defining MediaStream consumers
- [Bug 22273] "When track constraints change" should be better described, referred from applyConstraints
- [Bug 25230] readyState attribute must be inherited while cloning a MediaStreamTrack
- [Bug 22260] Give guidance on defining MediaStream consumers
- [Bug 25247] New: getCapabilities needs to decide what scope(s) it's available at
- [Bug 22259] Disabled mediastreamtrack and state of media element
- [Bug 22217] What happens if mediastream source becomes unavailable during the consent prompt?
- [Bug 22209] "each key MUST be a valid registered constraint name in the IANA-hosted RTCWeb Media Constraints registry"
- Re: WebIDL-compatible syntax compromise
- Re: [Bug 22593] Capabilities are buggy
- [Bug 25226] Retriving track using getTrackById in Examples is not proper.
- [Bug 23817] [Nit] Redundant TOC headers 8.1 & 9.1
- Re: [Bug 22593] Capabilities are buggy
- Re: [Bug 22593] Capabilities are buggy
- Re: [Bug 22593] Capabilities are buggy
- [Bug 22593] Capabilities are buggy
- [Bug 23817] [Nit] Redundant TOC headers 8.1 & 9.1
- [Bug 23824] Extraneous constraint structure described in prose...(please remove)
- [Bug 22593] Capabilities are buggy
- [Bug 25245] Specify "access" in the context of getMediaDevices
- Re: status of authorization process for getMediaDevices
- [Bug 25245] New: Specify "access" in the context of getMediaDevices
- Re: WebIDL-compatible syntax compromise
Wednesday, 2 April 2014
Thursday, 3 April 2014
- Re: echoCancelation (sic)
- Re: echoCancelation (sic)
- Re: Can constraints constrain by default?
- Re: Can constraints constrain by default?
- Can constraints constrain by default?
Wednesday, 2 April 2014
- Re: Ideal? (was Re: WebIDL-compatible syntax compromise)
- Re: Ideal? (was Re: WebIDL-compatible syntax compromise)
- Re: WebIDL-compatible syntax compromise
- Re: WebIDL-compatible syntax compromise
- Re: WebIDL-compatible syntax compromise
- Re: WebIDL-compatible syntax compromise
- Re: Ideal? (was Re: WebIDL-compatible syntax compromise)
- Ideal? (was Re: WebIDL-compatible syntax compromise)
- Re: WebIDL-compatible syntax compromise
- Re: WebIDL-compatible syntax compromise
- Re: WebIDL-compatible syntax compromise
- Re: WebIDL-compatible syntax compromise
- Re: echoCancelation (sic)
- Re: WebIDL-compatible syntax compromise
- Re: WebIDL-compatible syntax compromise
- Re: echoCancelation (sic)
- Re: WebIDL-compatible syntax compromise
- Re: WebIDL-compatible syntax compromise
- Re: WebIDL-compatible syntax compromise
- Re: WebIDL-compatible syntax compromise
- Re: WebIDL-compatible syntax compromise
- Re: WebIDL-compatible syntax compromise
- [Bug 25230] New: readyState attribute must be inherited while cloning a MediaStreamTrack
- Re: WebIDL-compatible syntax compromise
- [Bug 25226] New: Retriving track using getTrackById in Examples is not proper.
- WebIDL-compatible syntax compromise